通过多标准方法评估有轨电车-火车的可行性:布雷西亚案例(意大利)

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS
Nuhamin G. Assefa, Martina Carra, Roberto Ventura, Anna Richiedei, Benedetto Barabino
{"title":"通过多标准方法评估有轨电车-火车的可行性:布雷西亚案例(意大利)","authors":"Nuhamin G. Assefa,&nbsp;Martina Carra,&nbsp;Roberto Ventura,&nbsp;Anna Richiedei,&nbsp;Benedetto Barabino","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tram-Trains (TTs) are advanced, sustainable mobility systems that merge the best features of trams with regional railways. However, integrating heavy rail and tram operations introduces complexity in various areas, including infrastructure (track design, vehicles, power supply, and facilities) and organisational management. Ensuring compatibility often requires compromise solutions, such as adjusting the track gauges, modifying vehicle specifications, integrating power supply systems, and coordinating scheduling and operational procedures. Additionally, although this system is familiar to the transport community, there is a notable lack of studies utilising relevant planning tools and evaluation frameworks to assess the system's applicability and analyse potential alternatives, thereby enabling the selection of the best option for implementation in the target context.</p><p>The framework applied in this paper aims to address this gap in the existing literature. It employs a combined multi-criteria analysis approach: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to establish a hierarchy of evaluation criteria and <em>ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité</em> (ELECTRE) to determine the best compromise alternative. Moreover, the framework benefits from the input of practitioners and academics who were involved to assign importance to evaluation criteria and Monte Carlo simulation methods to include uncertainty. This framework enables the analysis of various design options and identifies the most suitable one for implementing a TT system in the studied context, precisely the territory of Brescia (Italy). Therefore, this study shows the potential viability of an interoperable system, such as the TT, which could be applicable in the selected area. These results are helpful since they might guide city planners and practitioners and serve as a benchmark for the scientific community while evaluating the applicability of the system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101178"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524000804/pdfft?md5=0602091074de6b2f14ab95ddf56f5f25&pid=1-s2.0-S2210539524000804-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Tram-Train feasibility via multicriteria approach: The case of Brescia (Italy)\",\"authors\":\"Nuhamin G. Assefa,&nbsp;Martina Carra,&nbsp;Roberto Ventura,&nbsp;Anna Richiedei,&nbsp;Benedetto Barabino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Tram-Trains (TTs) are advanced, sustainable mobility systems that merge the best features of trams with regional railways. However, integrating heavy rail and tram operations introduces complexity in various areas, including infrastructure (track design, vehicles, power supply, and facilities) and organisational management. Ensuring compatibility often requires compromise solutions, such as adjusting the track gauges, modifying vehicle specifications, integrating power supply systems, and coordinating scheduling and operational procedures. Additionally, although this system is familiar to the transport community, there is a notable lack of studies utilising relevant planning tools and evaluation frameworks to assess the system's applicability and analyse potential alternatives, thereby enabling the selection of the best option for implementation in the target context.</p><p>The framework applied in this paper aims to address this gap in the existing literature. It employs a combined multi-criteria analysis approach: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to establish a hierarchy of evaluation criteria and <em>ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité</em> (ELECTRE) to determine the best compromise alternative. Moreover, the framework benefits from the input of practitioners and academics who were involved to assign importance to evaluation criteria and Monte Carlo simulation methods to include uncertainty. This framework enables the analysis of various design options and identifies the most suitable one for implementing a TT system in the studied context, precisely the territory of Brescia (Italy). Therefore, this study shows the potential viability of an interoperable system, such as the TT, which could be applicable in the selected area. These results are helpful since they might guide city planners and practitioners and serve as a benchmark for the scientific community while evaluating the applicability of the system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524000804/pdfft?md5=0602091074de6b2f14ab95ddf56f5f25&pid=1-s2.0-S2210539524000804-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524000804\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524000804","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有轨电车(TT)是先进的可持续交通系统,融合了有轨电车和区域铁路的最佳特点。然而,将重轨和有轨电车的运营整合在一起,会给基础设施(轨道设计、车辆、电力供应和设施)和组织管理等多个领域带来复杂性。要确保兼容性,往往需要折中的解决方案,例如调整轨道轨距、修改车辆规格、整合供电系统以及协调调度和运营程序。此外,虽然这一系统为运输界所熟知,但明显缺乏利用相关规划工具和评估框架来评估系统适用性和分析潜在替代方案的研究,因此无法选择最佳方案在目标环境中实施。本文采用的框架旨在解决现有文献中的这一空白,它采用了一种多标准综合分析方法:本文所采用的框架旨在解决现有文献中的这一空白,它采用了一种多标准综合分析方法:层次分析法(AHP)来建立评价标准的层次结构,ELIMination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité(ELECTRE)来确定最佳折中方案。此外,该框架还得益于从业人员和学者的参与,他们为评价标准和蒙特卡罗模拟方法赋予了重要意义,以纳入不确定性。该框架可对各种设计方案进行分析,并确定最适合在所研究的环境(即意大利布雷西亚地区)中实施 TT 系统的方案。因此,这项研究显示了可互操作系统(如 TT)在选定地区的潜在可行性。这些结果可以为城市规划者和从业人员提供指导,并作为科学界评估该系统适用性的基准,因此非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Tram-Train feasibility via multicriteria approach: The case of Brescia (Italy)

Tram-Trains (TTs) are advanced, sustainable mobility systems that merge the best features of trams with regional railways. However, integrating heavy rail and tram operations introduces complexity in various areas, including infrastructure (track design, vehicles, power supply, and facilities) and organisational management. Ensuring compatibility often requires compromise solutions, such as adjusting the track gauges, modifying vehicle specifications, integrating power supply systems, and coordinating scheduling and operational procedures. Additionally, although this system is familiar to the transport community, there is a notable lack of studies utilising relevant planning tools and evaluation frameworks to assess the system's applicability and analyse potential alternatives, thereby enabling the selection of the best option for implementation in the target context.

The framework applied in this paper aims to address this gap in the existing literature. It employs a combined multi-criteria analysis approach: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to establish a hierarchy of evaluation criteria and ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité (ELECTRE) to determine the best compromise alternative. Moreover, the framework benefits from the input of practitioners and academics who were involved to assign importance to evaluation criteria and Monte Carlo simulation methods to include uncertainty. This framework enables the analysis of various design options and identifies the most suitable one for implementing a TT system in the studied context, precisely the territory of Brescia (Italy). Therefore, this study shows the potential viability of an interoperable system, such as the TT, which could be applicable in the selected area. These results are helpful since they might guide city planners and practitioners and serve as a benchmark for the scientific community while evaluating the applicability of the system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信