评估指导、限制、支持和扼杀:评估改革期间教师对评估观念的紧张关系

IF 4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Laura Ketonen , Juuso Henrik Nieminen
{"title":"评估指导、限制、支持和扼杀:评估改革期间教师对评估观念的紧张关系","authors":"Laura Ketonen ,&nbsp;Juuso Henrik Nieminen","doi":"10.1016/j.tate.2024.104737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines tensions in teachers' conceptions of assessment following an assessment reform in Finland, which has traditionally been a low-stakes assessment culture. There are no national examinations in comprehensive education; instead, teachers assign students' final grades. Recently, the country has introduced more detailed criteria for the final assessment to improve the comparability of grades. The analysis of 28 teacher interviews reveals that this relatively minor reform has created four significant tensions in teachers’ conceptions of assessment. We call for assessment reforms to be culturally sensitive, carefully considering the context in which they are implemented and paying attention to possible tensions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48430,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Teacher Education","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 104737"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X24002695/pdfft?md5=597c5a952831305171b69ddafe531e9a&pid=1-s2.0-S0742051X24002695-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment guides, restricts, supports and strangles: Tensions in teachers’ conceptions of assessment during an assessment reform\",\"authors\":\"Laura Ketonen ,&nbsp;Juuso Henrik Nieminen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tate.2024.104737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines tensions in teachers' conceptions of assessment following an assessment reform in Finland, which has traditionally been a low-stakes assessment culture. There are no national examinations in comprehensive education; instead, teachers assign students' final grades. Recently, the country has introduced more detailed criteria for the final assessment to improve the comparability of grades. The analysis of 28 teacher interviews reveals that this relatively minor reform has created four significant tensions in teachers’ conceptions of assessment. We call for assessment reforms to be culturally sensitive, carefully considering the context in which they are implemented and paying attention to possible tensions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X24002695/pdfft?md5=597c5a952831305171b69ddafe531e9a&pid=1-s2.0-S0742051X24002695-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X24002695\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X24002695","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了芬兰在进行评估改革之后,教师对评估观念所产生的紧张关系。芬兰的综合教育没有全国统考,而是由教师给学生评定期末成绩。最近,芬兰引入了更为详细的期末评估标准,以提高成绩的可比性。对 28 个教师访谈的分析表明,这一相对较小的改革在教师的评估观念中造成了四个重要的矛盾。我们呼吁评估改革应具有文化敏感性,认真考虑改革的实施背景,并关注可能出现的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment guides, restricts, supports and strangles: Tensions in teachers’ conceptions of assessment during an assessment reform

This study examines tensions in teachers' conceptions of assessment following an assessment reform in Finland, which has traditionally been a low-stakes assessment culture. There are no national examinations in comprehensive education; instead, teachers assign students' final grades. Recently, the country has introduced more detailed criteria for the final assessment to improve the comparability of grades. The analysis of 28 teacher interviews reveals that this relatively minor reform has created four significant tensions in teachers’ conceptions of assessment. We call for assessment reforms to be culturally sensitive, carefully considering the context in which they are implemented and paying attention to possible tensions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching and Teacher Education
Teaching and Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
12.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
86 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Teacher Education is an international journal concerned primarily with teachers, teaching, and/or teacher education situated in an international perspective and context. The journal focuses on early childhood through high school (secondary education), teacher preparation, along with higher education concerning teacher professional development and/or teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education is a multidisciplinary journal committed to no single approach, discipline, methodology, or paradigm. The journal welcomes varied approaches (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) to empirical research; also publishing high quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Manuscripts should enhance, build upon, and/or extend the boundaries of theory, research, and/or practice in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education does not publish unsolicited Book Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信