面对自然灾害抢救艺术藏品：挑战与成果

IF 0.8 4区化学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY

Studies in Conservation Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1080/00393630.2024.2373565

Suati Rojas Gutierrez, Adam Godijn, Bianca Gonçalves

引用次数: 0

摘要

案例研究描述了 2022 年 2 月澳大利亚东部特大洪水对藏品的影响，以及对利斯摩尔地区艺术馆艺术藏品的抢救。尽管事先已对洪水进行了预估，但...

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Salvaging Art Collections in the Face of Natural Disasters: Challenges and Outcomes

A case study describes the impact on a collection of the extreme floods in eastern Australia in February 2022, and the salvaging of the Lismore Regional Art Gallery art collection. Despite predeter...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studies in Conservation 化学-分析化学

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Studies in Conservation is the premier international peer-reviewed journal for the conservation of historic and artistic works. The intended readership includes the conservation professional in the broadest sense of the term: practising conservators of all types of object, conservation, heritage and museum scientists, collection or conservation managers, teachers and students of conservation, and academic researchers in the subject areas of arts, archaeology, the built heritage, materials history, art technological research and material culture. Studies in Conservation publishes original work on a range of subjects including, but not limited to, examination methods for works of art, new research in the analysis of artistic materials, mechanisms of deterioration, advances in conservation practice, novel methods of treatment, conservation issues in display and storage, preventive conservation, issues of collection care, conservation history and ethics, and the history of materials and technological processes. Scientific content is not necessary, and the editors encourage the submission of practical articles, review papers, position papers on best practice and the philosophy and ethics of collecting and preservation, to help maintain the traditional balance of the journal. Whatever the subject matter, accounts of routine procedures are not accepted, except where these lead to results that are sufficiently novel and/or significant to be of general interest.