粘连性囊炎的药物针刺疗法:实用随机对照试验研究

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Doori Kim , Kyoung Sun Park , Sun-A Kim , Ji Yeon Seo , Hyun-Woo Cho , Yoon Jae Lee , Changsop Yang , In-Hyuk Ha , Chang-Hyun Han
{"title":"粘连性囊炎的药物针刺疗法:实用随机对照试验研究","authors":"Doori Kim ,&nbsp;Kyoung Sun Park ,&nbsp;Sun-A Kim ,&nbsp;Ji Yeon Seo ,&nbsp;Hyun-Woo Cho ,&nbsp;Yoon Jae Lee ,&nbsp;Changsop Yang ,&nbsp;In-Hyuk Ha ,&nbsp;Chang-Hyun Han","doi":"10.1016/j.imr.2024.101065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although several studies have reported the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment for adhesive capsulitis (AC), research on pharmacopuncture therapy for AC remains limited. We compared the effectiveness and safety of pharmacopuncture and physiotherapy for AC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This pragmatic, randomized, controlled, parallel-group pilot study enrolled patients with limitations of shoulder movement and a numeric rating scale (NRS) score for shoulder pain ≥5 randomized (1:1) to the pharmacopuncture therapy (PPT) and physiotherapy (PT) groups. Treatment sessions were administered twice weekly for 6 weeks, and the participants were followed up for 13 weeks after randomization. The primary outcome was the NRS score for shoulder pain, and the secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), range of motion (ROM), patient global impression of change (PGIC), EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), and Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) scores. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was set as the primary analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 50 participants, for the primary endpoint (week 7) the PPT group showed a significantly superior improvement in NRS, VAS, SPADI, ROM for flexion, ROM for abduction, and EQ-5D-5L scores. The ROM for extension, ROM for adduction, physical component summary, and patient global impression of change were significantly better in the PPT than in the PT group, and these effects were sustained until week 13.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this pilot study, PPT showed better effects than PT, confirming the feasibility of a follow-up main study.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05292482) and cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0007198).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13644,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Medicine Research","volume":"13 3","pages":"Article 101065"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422024000453/pdfft?md5=1f32ced5c03609af2391cdf46baaf036&pid=1-s2.0-S2213422024000453-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacopuncture therapy for adhesive capsulitis: A pragmatic randomized controlled pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Doori Kim ,&nbsp;Kyoung Sun Park ,&nbsp;Sun-A Kim ,&nbsp;Ji Yeon Seo ,&nbsp;Hyun-Woo Cho ,&nbsp;Yoon Jae Lee ,&nbsp;Changsop Yang ,&nbsp;In-Hyuk Ha ,&nbsp;Chang-Hyun Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.imr.2024.101065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although several studies have reported the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment for adhesive capsulitis (AC), research on pharmacopuncture therapy for AC remains limited. We compared the effectiveness and safety of pharmacopuncture and physiotherapy for AC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This pragmatic, randomized, controlled, parallel-group pilot study enrolled patients with limitations of shoulder movement and a numeric rating scale (NRS) score for shoulder pain ≥5 randomized (1:1) to the pharmacopuncture therapy (PPT) and physiotherapy (PT) groups. Treatment sessions were administered twice weekly for 6 weeks, and the participants were followed up for 13 weeks after randomization. The primary outcome was the NRS score for shoulder pain, and the secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), range of motion (ROM), patient global impression of change (PGIC), EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), and Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) scores. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was set as the primary analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 50 participants, for the primary endpoint (week 7) the PPT group showed a significantly superior improvement in NRS, VAS, SPADI, ROM for flexion, ROM for abduction, and EQ-5D-5L scores. The ROM for extension, ROM for adduction, physical component summary, and patient global impression of change were significantly better in the PPT than in the PT group, and these effects were sustained until week 13.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this pilot study, PPT showed better effects than PT, confirming the feasibility of a follow-up main study.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05292482) and cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0007198).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Medicine Research\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422024000453/pdfft?md5=1f32ced5c03609af2391cdf46baaf036&pid=1-s2.0-S2213422024000453-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422024000453\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422024000453","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管已有多项研究报道了针灸治疗粘连性关节囊炎(AC)的有效性,但有关针刺药物治疗 AC 的研究仍然有限。我们比较了药物针刺和物理疗法治疗粘连性囊炎的有效性和安全性。这项务实、随机、对照、平行组试验研究招募了肩部活动受限且肩部疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)评分≥5分的患者,随机(1:1)分为药针疗法组(PPT)和物理疗法组(PT)。治疗过程每周两次,持续 6 周,随机分组后对参与者进行 13 周的随访。主要研究结果为肩痛的 NRS 评分,次要研究结果为视觉模拟量表 (VAS)、肩痛与残疾指数 (SPADI)、活动范围 (ROM)、患者总体变化印象 (PGIC)、EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level) 和简表 12 健康调查 (SF-12) 评分。意向治疗(ITT)分析被定为主要分析。在50名参与者中,在主要终点(第7周),PPT组在NRS、VAS、SPADI、屈曲ROM、外展ROM和EQ-5D-5L评分方面的改善明显优于PPT组。PPT 组的伸展 ROM、外展 ROM、体能部分总结和患者总体变化印象明显优于 PT 组,而且这些效果一直持续到第 13 周。在这项试点研究中,PPT 比 PT 显示出更好的效果,证实了后续主要研究的可行性。请参阅 Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05292482) 和 cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0007198)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacopuncture therapy for adhesive capsulitis: A pragmatic randomized controlled pilot study

Background

Although several studies have reported the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment for adhesive capsulitis (AC), research on pharmacopuncture therapy for AC remains limited. We compared the effectiveness and safety of pharmacopuncture and physiotherapy for AC.

Methods

This pragmatic, randomized, controlled, parallel-group pilot study enrolled patients with limitations of shoulder movement and a numeric rating scale (NRS) score for shoulder pain ≥5 randomized (1:1) to the pharmacopuncture therapy (PPT) and physiotherapy (PT) groups. Treatment sessions were administered twice weekly for 6 weeks, and the participants were followed up for 13 weeks after randomization. The primary outcome was the NRS score for shoulder pain, and the secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), range of motion (ROM), patient global impression of change (PGIC), EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), and Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) scores. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was set as the primary analysis.

Results

Among 50 participants, for the primary endpoint (week 7) the PPT group showed a significantly superior improvement in NRS, VAS, SPADI, ROM for flexion, ROM for abduction, and EQ-5D-5L scores. The ROM for extension, ROM for adduction, physical component summary, and patient global impression of change were significantly better in the PPT than in the PT group, and these effects were sustained until week 13.

Conclusion

In this pilot study, PPT showed better effects than PT, confirming the feasibility of a follow-up main study.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05292482) and cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0007198).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrative Medicine Research
Integrative Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Integrative Medicine Research (IMR) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal focused on scientific research for integrative medicine including traditional medicine (emphasis on acupuncture and herbal medicine), complementary and alternative medicine, and systems medicine. The journal includes papers on basic research, clinical research, methodology, theory, computational analysis and modelling, topical reviews, medical history, education and policy based on physiology, pathology, diagnosis and the systems approach in the field of integrative medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信