使用可定制的 L 型支架治疗喉气管狭窄:成功与失败的模式

Nicolas J. Casellas, Eytan Keidar, Mursalin M. Anis, D. Rosow
{"title":"使用可定制的 L 型支架治疗喉气管狭窄:成功与失败的模式","authors":"Nicolas J. Casellas, Eytan Keidar, Mursalin M. Anis, D. Rosow","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recent innovation in the management of tracheostomy‐dependent patients with laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) has been the customizable laryngotracheal stent, made by dividing a T‐tube in half (“L stent”). These L stents can be placed into the subglottis as well as the posterior glottis to prevent rapid re‐stenosis following surgery, and they are easily removed in the office. We sought to review our experience with these stents and analyze patterns of success and failure.Retrospective chart review was performed of all tracheostomy‐dependent patients who underwent L stent placement from January 2019 through February 2024. Clinical and demographic data were reviewed, with decannulation as the primary endpoint. Patients were assessed as having comorbid conditions (diabetes, coronary artery disease, morbid obesity, prior radiation) or not.A total of 16 patients underwent stent placement. Six patients had posterior glottic stenosis (PGS), six had subglottic stenosis (SGS), and four had multilevel stenosis. Of these 16 patients, 9 were ultimately decannulated (56.2%). Three of the successes were PGS (33.3%), four were SGS (44.4%), and two had both SGS and PGS (22.2%). Patients who were decannulated were statistically less likely to have comorbid conditions than patients who failed decannulation (p = 0.0350).For tracheostomy‐dependent patients who have failed first‐line therapy, endoscopic surgery paired with L stent placement offers a reasonable alternative to open airway reconstruction or more destructive arytenoidectomy or cordotomy procedures. As with most airway surgeries, patient selection is important, as the presence of multilevel stenosis and/or comorbid conditions can predict a higher failure rate.","PeriodicalId":510563,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"42 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a customizable L stent for laryngotracheal stenosis: Patterns of success and failure\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas J. Casellas, Eytan Keidar, Mursalin M. Anis, D. Rosow\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjo2.204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A recent innovation in the management of tracheostomy‐dependent patients with laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) has been the customizable laryngotracheal stent, made by dividing a T‐tube in half (“L stent”). These L stents can be placed into the subglottis as well as the posterior glottis to prevent rapid re‐stenosis following surgery, and they are easily removed in the office. We sought to review our experience with these stents and analyze patterns of success and failure.Retrospective chart review was performed of all tracheostomy‐dependent patients who underwent L stent placement from January 2019 through February 2024. Clinical and demographic data were reviewed, with decannulation as the primary endpoint. Patients were assessed as having comorbid conditions (diabetes, coronary artery disease, morbid obesity, prior radiation) or not.A total of 16 patients underwent stent placement. Six patients had posterior glottic stenosis (PGS), six had subglottic stenosis (SGS), and four had multilevel stenosis. Of these 16 patients, 9 were ultimately decannulated (56.2%). Three of the successes were PGS (33.3%), four were SGS (44.4%), and two had both SGS and PGS (22.2%). Patients who were decannulated were statistically less likely to have comorbid conditions than patients who failed decannulation (p = 0.0350).For tracheostomy‐dependent patients who have failed first‐line therapy, endoscopic surgery paired with L stent placement offers a reasonable alternative to open airway reconstruction or more destructive arytenoidectomy or cordotomy procedures. As with most airway surgeries, patient selection is important, as the presence of multilevel stenosis and/or comorbid conditions can predict a higher failure rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"42 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,在治疗依赖气管造口术的喉气管狭窄(LTS)患者方面出现了一种创新技术,即通过将 T 型管一分为二制成的可定制喉气管支架("L 支架")。这些 L 型支架既可以放置在声门下,也可以放置在声门后部,以防止术后迅速再次狭窄,而且可以在诊室中轻松取出。我们试图回顾使用这些支架的经验,分析成功和失败的模式。我们对 2019 年 1 月至 2024 年 2 月期间接受 L 支架置入术的所有气管造口依赖患者进行了回顾性病历审查。我们对临床和人口统计学数据进行了回顾性分析,并将解除封管作为主要终点。患者被评估为是否患有合并症(糖尿病、冠心病、病态肥胖、曾接受过放射治疗)。共有 16 名患者接受了支架置入手术,其中 6 名患者为声门后狭窄(PGS),6 名患者为声门下狭窄(SGS),4 名患者为多层次狭窄。在这 16 名患者中,有 9 人(56.2%)最终解除了声门狭窄。其中 3 例为 PGS(33.3%),4 例为 SGS(44.4%),2 例同时患有 SGS 和 PGS(22.2%)。对于一线治疗失败的气管造口依赖患者,内窥镜手术与 L 支架置入术的搭配为开放式气道重建或破坏性更强的杓状动脉切除术或脐带切开术提供了合理的替代方案。与大多数气道手术一样,患者的选择非常重要,因为存在多层次狭窄和/或合并症可预示较高的失败率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using a customizable L stent for laryngotracheal stenosis: Patterns of success and failure
A recent innovation in the management of tracheostomy‐dependent patients with laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) has been the customizable laryngotracheal stent, made by dividing a T‐tube in half (“L stent”). These L stents can be placed into the subglottis as well as the posterior glottis to prevent rapid re‐stenosis following surgery, and they are easily removed in the office. We sought to review our experience with these stents and analyze patterns of success and failure.Retrospective chart review was performed of all tracheostomy‐dependent patients who underwent L stent placement from January 2019 through February 2024. Clinical and demographic data were reviewed, with decannulation as the primary endpoint. Patients were assessed as having comorbid conditions (diabetes, coronary artery disease, morbid obesity, prior radiation) or not.A total of 16 patients underwent stent placement. Six patients had posterior glottic stenosis (PGS), six had subglottic stenosis (SGS), and four had multilevel stenosis. Of these 16 patients, 9 were ultimately decannulated (56.2%). Three of the successes were PGS (33.3%), four were SGS (44.4%), and two had both SGS and PGS (22.2%). Patients who were decannulated were statistically less likely to have comorbid conditions than patients who failed decannulation (p = 0.0350).For tracheostomy‐dependent patients who have failed first‐line therapy, endoscopic surgery paired with L stent placement offers a reasonable alternative to open airway reconstruction or more destructive arytenoidectomy or cordotomy procedures. As with most airway surgeries, patient selection is important, as the presence of multilevel stenosis and/or comorbid conditions can predict a higher failure rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信