比较两种止血技术对接受卵巢切除术的宠物兔的手术时间、术后疼痛和胃肠功能的影响。

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Dario d'Ovidio , Chiara Adami
{"title":"比较两种止血技术对接受卵巢切除术的宠物兔的手术时间、术后疼痛和胃肠功能的影响。","authors":"Dario d'Ovidio ,&nbsp;Chiara Adami","doi":"10.1016/j.tcam.2024.100906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ovariohysterectomy is a common surgical procedure in pet rabbits and one of its potential complications is postoperative gastrointestinal stasis, possibly exacerbated by prolonged surgery time. The objective of this prospective clinical study was to compare two techniques for surgical haemostasis with respect to procedural duration, postoperative pain, and return of gastrointestinal function, in 22 female rabbits undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Rabbits were assigned to one of two groups: conventional vessel ligation (CVL) and haemostasis with a vessel sealing device (VSD). The outcome variables for comparison between the two groups, recorded at 60-, 120-, 180-, and 360-minutes post anaesthesia, were duration of anaesthesia and surgery, postoperative Rabbit Grimace Scale scores, and measured food intake and faecal output. The vessel sealing device caused no appreciable blood loss. The duration of both surgery and anaesthesia was shorter in group VSD (20 ± 4 and 31 ± 6 minutes, respectively) than in group CVL (43 ± 9 and 54 ± 9 minutes, respectively) (p &lt; 0.001). There were no differences between groups in time elapsed from the end of anaesthesia to both first food intake and first defecation. In both groups, the score of the Rabbit Grimace Scale decreased over time with statistically significant differences between 60 minutes and all the subsequent time points (p &lt; 0.001). Vessel sealing devices may be recommended over conventional haemostasis for rabbit ovariohysterectomy to decrease the duration of surgery and anaesthesia, with potential beneficial effects on sustainability and practice workflow.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23144,"journal":{"name":"Topics in companion animal medicine","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 100906"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1938973624000618/pdfft?md5=4be62bc709fec3f6d85a1ad30f3693fc&pid=1-s2.0-S1938973624000618-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two haemostasis techniques on procedural duration, postoperative pain and gastrointestinal function in pet rabbits undergoing ovariohysterectomy\",\"authors\":\"Dario d'Ovidio ,&nbsp;Chiara Adami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tcam.2024.100906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ovariohysterectomy is a common surgical procedure in pet rabbits and one of its potential complications is postoperative gastrointestinal stasis, possibly exacerbated by prolonged surgery time. The objective of this prospective clinical study was to compare two techniques for surgical haemostasis with respect to procedural duration, postoperative pain, and return of gastrointestinal function, in 22 female rabbits undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Rabbits were assigned to one of two groups: conventional vessel ligation (CVL) and haemostasis with a vessel sealing device (VSD). The outcome variables for comparison between the two groups, recorded at 60-, 120-, 180-, and 360-minutes post anaesthesia, were duration of anaesthesia and surgery, postoperative Rabbit Grimace Scale scores, and measured food intake and faecal output. The vessel sealing device caused no appreciable blood loss. The duration of both surgery and anaesthesia was shorter in group VSD (20 ± 4 and 31 ± 6 minutes, respectively) than in group CVL (43 ± 9 and 54 ± 9 minutes, respectively) (p &lt; 0.001). There were no differences between groups in time elapsed from the end of anaesthesia to both first food intake and first defecation. In both groups, the score of the Rabbit Grimace Scale decreased over time with statistically significant differences between 60 minutes and all the subsequent time points (p &lt; 0.001). Vessel sealing devices may be recommended over conventional haemostasis for rabbit ovariohysterectomy to decrease the duration of surgery and anaesthesia, with potential beneficial effects on sustainability and practice workflow.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in companion animal medicine\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100906\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1938973624000618/pdfft?md5=4be62bc709fec3f6d85a1ad30f3693fc&pid=1-s2.0-S1938973624000618-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in companion animal medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1938973624000618\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in companion animal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1938973624000618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卵巢切除术是宠物兔常见的外科手术,其潜在并发症之一是术后胃肠道淤血,手术时间延长可能会加重这种并发症。这项前瞻性临床研究的目的是比较两种手术止血技术对 22 只接受卵巢切除术的雌性兔子在手术时间、术后疼痛和胃肠功能恢复方面的影响。兔子被分配到两组中的一组:传统血管结扎(CVL)和使用血管密封装置(VSD)止血。在麻醉后 60、120、180 和 360 分钟记录的两组比较结果变量包括麻醉和手术持续时间、术后兔格林美量表评分以及测量的食物摄入量和粪便排出量。血管密封装置没有造成明显的失血。VSD 组的手术时间和麻醉时间(分别为 20±4 分钟和 31±6 分钟)比 CVL 组(分别为 43±9 分钟和 54±9 分钟)短(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of two haemostasis techniques on procedural duration, postoperative pain and gastrointestinal function in pet rabbits undergoing ovariohysterectomy

Ovariohysterectomy is a common surgical procedure in pet rabbits and one of its potential complications is postoperative gastrointestinal stasis, possibly exacerbated by prolonged surgery time. The objective of this prospective clinical study was to compare two techniques for surgical haemostasis with respect to procedural duration, postoperative pain, and return of gastrointestinal function, in 22 female rabbits undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Rabbits were assigned to one of two groups: conventional vessel ligation (CVL) and haemostasis with a vessel sealing device (VSD). The outcome variables for comparison between the two groups, recorded at 60-, 120-, 180-, and 360-minutes post anaesthesia, were duration of anaesthesia and surgery, postoperative Rabbit Grimace Scale scores, and measured food intake and faecal output. The vessel sealing device caused no appreciable blood loss. The duration of both surgery and anaesthesia was shorter in group VSD (20 ± 4 and 31 ± 6 minutes, respectively) than in group CVL (43 ± 9 and 54 ± 9 minutes, respectively) (p < 0.001). There were no differences between groups in time elapsed from the end of anaesthesia to both first food intake and first defecation. In both groups, the score of the Rabbit Grimace Scale decreased over time with statistically significant differences between 60 minutes and all the subsequent time points (p < 0.001). Vessel sealing devices may be recommended over conventional haemostasis for rabbit ovariohysterectomy to decrease the duration of surgery and anaesthesia, with potential beneficial effects on sustainability and practice workflow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in companion animal medicine
Topics in companion animal medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Published quarterly, Topics in Companion Animal Medicine is a peer-reviewed veterinary scientific journal dedicated to providing practitioners with the most recent advances in companion animal medicine. The journal publishes high quality original clinical research focusing on important topics in companion animal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信