弥散加权回波平面成像与压缩 SENSE(EPICS-DWI)用于胰腺评估:一项多中心研究。

Tetsuro Kaga, Yoshifumi Noda, Masashi Asano, Nobuyuki Kawai, Kimihiro Kajita, Yukiko Takai, Fumitaka Ejima, Fuminori Hyodo, Hiroki Kato, Yoshihiko Fukukura, Masayuki Matsuo
{"title":"弥散加权回波平面成像与压缩 SENSE(EPICS-DWI)用于胰腺评估:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Tetsuro Kaga, Yoshifumi Noda, Masashi Asano, Nobuyuki Kawai, Kimihiro Kajita, Yukiko Takai, Fumitaka Ejima, Fuminori Hyodo, Hiroki Kato, Yoshihiko Fukukura, Masayuki Matsuo","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2024-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of single-shot echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging with compressed SENSE (EPICS-DWI) for pancreas assessment by comparing with single-shot echo planar DWI with parallel imaging (PI-DWI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter prospective study included 27 consecutive participants with untreated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (15 men; mean age, 67 ± 10 years) who underwent pancreatic protocol MRI including both PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI. Two radiologists independently and randomly reviewed the high b-value DWI images and qualitatively assigned confidence scores for overall image quality, image noise, pancreas conspicuity, and PDAC conspicuity using a 5-point scale. One radiologist measured the PDAC-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) on high b-value DWI images and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of PDAC. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were compared between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The confidence scores for overall image quality (P < 0.001 in both radiologists) and image noise (P < 0.001 in both radiologists) were higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI. The pancreas conspicuity was better in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI in one of the radiologists (P = 0.02 and 0.06). The PDAC conspicuity was comparable between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI (P > 0.99 in both radiologists). The PDAC-to-pancreas CNR was higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI (P = 0.02), while the ADC value of PDAC in PI-DWI was not significantly different compared to that in EPICS-DWI (P = 0.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The image quality and PDAC-to-pancreas CNR was improved in EPICS-DWI compared to PI-DWI. However, the conspicuity and ADC value of PDAC were comparable between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94126,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diffusion-weighted Echo Planar Imaging with Compressed SENSE (EPICS-DWI) for Pancreas Assessment: A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuro Kaga, Yoshifumi Noda, Masashi Asano, Nobuyuki Kawai, Kimihiro Kajita, Yukiko Takai, Fumitaka Ejima, Fuminori Hyodo, Hiroki Kato, Yoshihiko Fukukura, Masayuki Matsuo\",\"doi\":\"10.2463/mrms.mp.2024-0046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of single-shot echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging with compressed SENSE (EPICS-DWI) for pancreas assessment by comparing with single-shot echo planar DWI with parallel imaging (PI-DWI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter prospective study included 27 consecutive participants with untreated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (15 men; mean age, 67 ± 10 years) who underwent pancreatic protocol MRI including both PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI. Two radiologists independently and randomly reviewed the high b-value DWI images and qualitatively assigned confidence scores for overall image quality, image noise, pancreas conspicuity, and PDAC conspicuity using a 5-point scale. One radiologist measured the PDAC-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) on high b-value DWI images and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of PDAC. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were compared between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The confidence scores for overall image quality (P < 0.001 in both radiologists) and image noise (P < 0.001 in both radiologists) were higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI. The pancreas conspicuity was better in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI in one of the radiologists (P = 0.02 and 0.06). The PDAC conspicuity was comparable between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI (P > 0.99 in both radiologists). The PDAC-to-pancreas CNR was higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI (P = 0.02), while the ADC value of PDAC in PI-DWI was not significantly different compared to that in EPICS-DWI (P = 0.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The image quality and PDAC-to-pancreas CNR was improved in EPICS-DWI compared to PI-DWI. However, the conspicuity and ADC value of PDAC were comparable between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2024-0046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2024-0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过与平行成像单次回波平面弥散加权成像(PI-DWI)进行比较,评估压缩SENSE单次回波平面弥散加权成像(EPICS-DWI)用于胰腺评估的可行性:这项多中心前瞻性研究连续纳入了27名未经治疗的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者(15名男性,平均年龄(67 ± 10)岁),他们都接受了包括PI-DWI和EPICS-DWI在内的胰腺MRI检查。两名放射科医生独立随机审查了高 b 值 DWI 图像,并采用 5 级评分法对整体图像质量、图像噪声、胰腺清晰度和 PDAC 清晰度进行了可信度评分。一位放射科医生测量了高 b 值 DWI 图像上 PDAC 与胰腺的对比度-噪声比(CNR)以及 PDAC 的表观弥散系数(ADC)值。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较了PI-DWI和EPICS-DWI的定性和定量参数:总体图像质量的置信度评分(两位放射医师的 P 均为 0.99)。EPICS-DWI中PDAC对胰腺的CNR高于PI-DWI(P = 0.02),而PI-DWI中PDAC的ADC值与EPICS-DWI中的相比无显著差异(P = 0.48):结论:与PI-DWI相比,EPICS-DWI的图像质量和PDAC-胰腺CNR均有所改善。结论:与 PI-DWI 相比,EPICS-DWI 的图像质量和 PDAC 对胰腺的 CNR 均有所改善,但 PDAC 的清晰度和 ADC 值在 PI-DWI 和 EPICS-DWI 之间不相上下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diffusion-weighted Echo Planar Imaging with Compressed SENSE (EPICS-DWI) for Pancreas Assessment: A Multicenter Study.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of single-shot echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging with compressed SENSE (EPICS-DWI) for pancreas assessment by comparing with single-shot echo planar DWI with parallel imaging (PI-DWI).

Methods: This multicenter prospective study included 27 consecutive participants with untreated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (15 men; mean age, 67 ± 10 years) who underwent pancreatic protocol MRI including both PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI. Two radiologists independently and randomly reviewed the high b-value DWI images and qualitatively assigned confidence scores for overall image quality, image noise, pancreas conspicuity, and PDAC conspicuity using a 5-point scale. One radiologist measured the PDAC-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) on high b-value DWI images and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of PDAC. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were compared between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: The confidence scores for overall image quality (P < 0.001 in both radiologists) and image noise (P < 0.001 in both radiologists) were higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI. The pancreas conspicuity was better in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI in one of the radiologists (P = 0.02 and 0.06). The PDAC conspicuity was comparable between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI (P > 0.99 in both radiologists). The PDAC-to-pancreas CNR was higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI (P = 0.02), while the ADC value of PDAC in PI-DWI was not significantly different compared to that in EPICS-DWI (P = 0.48).

Conclusion: The image quality and PDAC-to-pancreas CNR was improved in EPICS-DWI compared to PI-DWI. However, the conspicuity and ADC value of PDAC were comparable between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信