Matthew J. Breit, Nassia M. Duncan, Jared H. Dahle, Victoria A. Catenacci, Seth A. Creasy, Elena S. Berman, John R. Speakman, Edward L. Melanson
{"title":"改进使用两点双标记水法测量每日总能量消耗的质量控制程序。","authors":"Matthew J. Breit, Nassia M. Duncan, Jared H. Dahle, Victoria A. Catenacci, Seth A. Creasy, Elena S. Berman, John R. Speakman, Edward L. Melanson","doi":"10.1002/rcm.9886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>The precision of the doubly labeled water (DLW) method is determined by the precision and accuracy of the isotopic measurements. Quality control (QC) procedures to mitigate sample variability require additional measurements if sample duplicates differ more than a factor of instrument precision. We explored the effect of widening QC ranges on total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) determined using the two-point sampling method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We screened DLW data from 121 individuals for instances where samples were analyzed more than twice using our existing QC criteria (±2.0 per mil [δ] for <sup>2</sup>H and ±0.5 δ for <sup>18</sup>O). We then applied wider QC ranges for accepting duplicate measures and recalculated TDEE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Widening the <sup>2</sup>H QC range to ±10.0 δ in samples collected on the first day (most enriched) and to ±5.0 δ in samples collected on the final day (less enriched) produced almost identical mean TDEE compared to the originally calculated TDEE (2684 ± 508 vs. 2687 ± 512 kcal/day, <i>p</i> = 0.40). There was a strong correlation with the originally calculated TDEE (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.97, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Expanding the <sup>2</sup>H QC range to ±10.0 δ for samples collected on the first day and ±5.0 δ for samples collected on the final day provides similar mean TDEE results. These findings may help DLW labs optimize QC criteria and reduce analytical costs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":225,"journal":{"name":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","volume":"38 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving quality control procedures for the measurement of total daily energy expenditure using the two-point doubly labeled water method\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J. Breit, Nassia M. Duncan, Jared H. Dahle, Victoria A. Catenacci, Seth A. Creasy, Elena S. Berman, John R. Speakman, Edward L. Melanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rcm.9886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Rationale</h3>\\n \\n <p>The precision of the doubly labeled water (DLW) method is determined by the precision and accuracy of the isotopic measurements. Quality control (QC) procedures to mitigate sample variability require additional measurements if sample duplicates differ more than a factor of instrument precision. We explored the effect of widening QC ranges on total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) determined using the two-point sampling method.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We screened DLW data from 121 individuals for instances where samples were analyzed more than twice using our existing QC criteria (±2.0 per mil [δ] for <sup>2</sup>H and ±0.5 δ for <sup>18</sup>O). We then applied wider QC ranges for accepting duplicate measures and recalculated TDEE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Widening the <sup>2</sup>H QC range to ±10.0 δ in samples collected on the first day (most enriched) and to ±5.0 δ in samples collected on the final day (less enriched) produced almost identical mean TDEE compared to the originally calculated TDEE (2684 ± 508 vs. 2687 ± 512 kcal/day, <i>p</i> = 0.40). There was a strong correlation with the originally calculated TDEE (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.97, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Expanding the <sup>2</sup>H QC range to ±10.0 δ for samples collected on the first day and ±5.0 δ for samples collected on the final day provides similar mean TDEE results. These findings may help DLW labs optimize QC criteria and reduce analytical costs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry\",\"volume\":\"38 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcm.9886\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcm.9886","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving quality control procedures for the measurement of total daily energy expenditure using the two-point doubly labeled water method
Rationale
The precision of the doubly labeled water (DLW) method is determined by the precision and accuracy of the isotopic measurements. Quality control (QC) procedures to mitigate sample variability require additional measurements if sample duplicates differ more than a factor of instrument precision. We explored the effect of widening QC ranges on total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) determined using the two-point sampling method.
Methods
We screened DLW data from 121 individuals for instances where samples were analyzed more than twice using our existing QC criteria (±2.0 per mil [δ] for 2H and ±0.5 δ for 18O). We then applied wider QC ranges for accepting duplicate measures and recalculated TDEE.
Results
Widening the 2H QC range to ±10.0 δ in samples collected on the first day (most enriched) and to ±5.0 δ in samples collected on the final day (less enriched) produced almost identical mean TDEE compared to the originally calculated TDEE (2684 ± 508 vs. 2687 ± 512 kcal/day, p = 0.40). There was a strong correlation with the originally calculated TDEE (r2 = 0.97, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Expanding the 2H QC range to ±10.0 δ for samples collected on the first day and ±5.0 δ for samples collected on the final day provides similar mean TDEE results. These findings may help DLW labs optimize QC criteria and reduce analytical costs.
期刊介绍:
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry is a journal whose aim is the rapid publication of original research results and ideas on all aspects of the science of gas-phase ions; it covers all the associated scientific disciplines. There is no formal limit on paper length ("rapid" is not synonymous with "brief"), but papers should be of a length that is commensurate with the importance and complexity of the results being reported. Contributions may be theoretical or practical in nature; they may deal with methods, techniques and applications, or with the interpretation of results; they may cover any area in science that depends directly on measurements made upon gaseous ions or that is associated with such measurements.