改进使用两点双标记水法测量每日总能量消耗的质量控制程序。

IF 1.8 3区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Matthew J. Breit, Nassia M. Duncan, Jared H. Dahle, Victoria A. Catenacci, Seth A. Creasy, Elena S. Berman, John R. Speakman, Edward L. Melanson
{"title":"改进使用两点双标记水法测量每日总能量消耗的质量控制程序。","authors":"Matthew J. Breit,&nbsp;Nassia M. Duncan,&nbsp;Jared H. Dahle,&nbsp;Victoria A. Catenacci,&nbsp;Seth A. Creasy,&nbsp;Elena S. Berman,&nbsp;John R. Speakman,&nbsp;Edward L. Melanson","doi":"10.1002/rcm.9886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>The precision of the doubly labeled water (DLW) method is determined by the precision and accuracy of the isotopic measurements. Quality control (QC) procedures to mitigate sample variability require additional measurements if sample duplicates differ more than a factor of instrument precision. We explored the effect of widening QC ranges on total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) determined using the two-point sampling method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We screened DLW data from 121 individuals for instances where samples were analyzed more than twice using our existing QC criteria (±2.0 per mil [δ] for <sup>2</sup>H and ±0.5 δ for <sup>18</sup>O). We then applied wider QC ranges for accepting duplicate measures and recalculated TDEE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Widening the <sup>2</sup>H QC range to ±10.0 δ in samples collected on the first day (most enriched) and to ±5.0 δ in samples collected on the final day (less enriched) produced almost identical mean TDEE compared to the originally calculated TDEE (2684 ± 508 vs. 2687 ± 512 kcal/day, <i>p</i> = 0.40). There was a strong correlation with the originally calculated TDEE (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.97, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Expanding the <sup>2</sup>H QC range to ±10.0 δ for samples collected on the first day and ±5.0 δ for samples collected on the final day provides similar mean TDEE results. These findings may help DLW labs optimize QC criteria and reduce analytical costs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":225,"journal":{"name":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","volume":"38 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving quality control procedures for the measurement of total daily energy expenditure using the two-point doubly labeled water method\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J. Breit,&nbsp;Nassia M. Duncan,&nbsp;Jared H. Dahle,&nbsp;Victoria A. Catenacci,&nbsp;Seth A. Creasy,&nbsp;Elena S. Berman,&nbsp;John R. Speakman,&nbsp;Edward L. Melanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rcm.9886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Rationale</h3>\\n \\n <p>The precision of the doubly labeled water (DLW) method is determined by the precision and accuracy of the isotopic measurements. Quality control (QC) procedures to mitigate sample variability require additional measurements if sample duplicates differ more than a factor of instrument precision. We explored the effect of widening QC ranges on total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) determined using the two-point sampling method.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We screened DLW data from 121 individuals for instances where samples were analyzed more than twice using our existing QC criteria (±2.0 per mil [δ] for <sup>2</sup>H and ±0.5 δ for <sup>18</sup>O). We then applied wider QC ranges for accepting duplicate measures and recalculated TDEE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Widening the <sup>2</sup>H QC range to ±10.0 δ in samples collected on the first day (most enriched) and to ±5.0 δ in samples collected on the final day (less enriched) produced almost identical mean TDEE compared to the originally calculated TDEE (2684 ± 508 vs. 2687 ± 512 kcal/day, <i>p</i> = 0.40). There was a strong correlation with the originally calculated TDEE (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.97, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Expanding the <sup>2</sup>H QC range to ±10.0 δ for samples collected on the first day and ±5.0 δ for samples collected on the final day provides similar mean TDEE results. These findings may help DLW labs optimize QC criteria and reduce analytical costs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry\",\"volume\":\"38 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcm.9886\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcm.9886","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:双标记水 (DLW) 方法的精度由同位素测量的精度和准确度决定。如果重复样本的差异超过仪器精度的一个系数,则需要进行额外的测量,以减轻样本变异性的质量控制(QC)程序。我们探讨了扩大质量控制范围对使用两点取样法测定的每日总能量消耗(TDEE)的影响:我们对 121 人的 DLW 数据进行了筛选,以确定是否存在使用现有 QC 标准(2H 为 ±2.0 per mil [δ],18O 为 ±0.5 δ)对样本进行两次以上分析的情况。然后,我们采用更宽的质控范围接受重复测量,并重新计算 TDEE:将第一天采集的样本(富集程度最高)的 2H QC 范围扩大到 ±10.0 δ,将最后一天采集的样本(富集程度较低)的 2H QC 范围扩大到 ±5.0 δ,得出的平均 TDEE 与最初计算的 TDEE 几乎相同(2684 ± 508 对 2687 ± 512 千卡/天,p = 0.40)。与最初计算的 TDEE 有很强的相关性(r2 = 0.97,p 结论):将第一天采集的样本的 2H QC 范围扩大到 ±10.0 δ,最后一天采集的样本的 2H QC 范围扩大到 ±5.0 δ,可获得相似的平均 TDEE 结果。这些发现有助于 DLW 实验室优化质量控制标准并降低分析成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving quality control procedures for the measurement of total daily energy expenditure using the two-point doubly labeled water method

Rationale

The precision of the doubly labeled water (DLW) method is determined by the precision and accuracy of the isotopic measurements. Quality control (QC) procedures to mitigate sample variability require additional measurements if sample duplicates differ more than a factor of instrument precision. We explored the effect of widening QC ranges on total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) determined using the two-point sampling method.

Methods

We screened DLW data from 121 individuals for instances where samples were analyzed more than twice using our existing QC criteria (±2.0 per mil [δ] for 2H and ±0.5 δ for 18O). We then applied wider QC ranges for accepting duplicate measures and recalculated TDEE.

Results

Widening the 2H QC range to ±10.0 δ in samples collected on the first day (most enriched) and to ±5.0 δ in samples collected on the final day (less enriched) produced almost identical mean TDEE compared to the originally calculated TDEE (2684 ± 508 vs. 2687 ± 512 kcal/day, p = 0.40). There was a strong correlation with the originally calculated TDEE (r2 = 0.97, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Expanding the 2H QC range to ±10.0 δ for samples collected on the first day and ±5.0 δ for samples collected on the final day provides similar mean TDEE results. These findings may help DLW labs optimize QC criteria and reduce analytical costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
219
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry is a journal whose aim is the rapid publication of original research results and ideas on all aspects of the science of gas-phase ions; it covers all the associated scientific disciplines. There is no formal limit on paper length ("rapid" is not synonymous with "brief"), but papers should be of a length that is commensurate with the importance and complexity of the results being reported. Contributions may be theoretical or practical in nature; they may deal with methods, techniques and applications, or with the interpretation of results; they may cover any area in science that depends directly on measurements made upon gaseous ions or that is associated with such measurements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信