利用大型数据库对脑外伤患者进行早期康复干预的效果。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13243
Shota Hayashi, Tomohiko Kamo, Ryo Momosaki
{"title":"利用大型数据库对脑外伤患者进行早期康复干预的效果。","authors":"Shota Hayashi, Tomohiko Kamo, Ryo Momosaki","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rehabilitation is important for patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the timing of early rehabilitation initiation is ambiguous, and its safety and effectiveness are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effectiveness and safety of early rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI using propensity score analysis and a large database.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A large medical database (JMDC database) of tertiary care facilities was used to compare outcomes of early and delayed rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients aged between 20 and 90 years who were diagnosed with TBI were admitted to acute care hospitals. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing rehabilitation within 7 days of admission with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 to 12 on admission. This study included 3074 patients with moderate-to-severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were classified into an early rehabilitation group (within 2 days of admission) or a delayed rehabilitation group (3 to 7 days postadmission), depending on when rehabilitation started after TBI. Rehabilitation was defined as any type or intensity of intervention provided by a physical, occupational, and/or speech/language therapist. Interventions were not controlled.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>The primary outcome was Barthel Index (BI) efficiency (BI gain/length of stay). Secondary outcomes included BI gain (discharge BI - admission BI), incidence of aspiration pneumonia complications during hospitalization, discharge to home, mortality, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After applying inverse probability weighting with propensity scores, the total was 6152 patients. 3074 (50.0%) patients received early rehabilitation. The early rehabilitation group showed no difference in inpatient mortality (p = .438), improved BI efficiency (β = 0.86, p < .001), and shorter length of stay (β = -5.00, p = .018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI is associated with more efficient functional improvement and reduced hospital stays without an increase in inpatient mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of early rehabilitation interventions in patients with traumatic brain injury using a large database.\",\"authors\":\"Shota Hayashi, Tomohiko Kamo, Ryo Momosaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rehabilitation is important for patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the timing of early rehabilitation initiation is ambiguous, and its safety and effectiveness are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effectiveness and safety of early rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI using propensity score analysis and a large database.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A large medical database (JMDC database) of tertiary care facilities was used to compare outcomes of early and delayed rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients aged between 20 and 90 years who were diagnosed with TBI were admitted to acute care hospitals. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing rehabilitation within 7 days of admission with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 to 12 on admission. This study included 3074 patients with moderate-to-severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were classified into an early rehabilitation group (within 2 days of admission) or a delayed rehabilitation group (3 to 7 days postadmission), depending on when rehabilitation started after TBI. Rehabilitation was defined as any type or intensity of intervention provided by a physical, occupational, and/or speech/language therapist. Interventions were not controlled.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>The primary outcome was Barthel Index (BI) efficiency (BI gain/length of stay). Secondary outcomes included BI gain (discharge BI - admission BI), incidence of aspiration pneumonia complications during hospitalization, discharge to home, mortality, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After applying inverse probability weighting with propensity scores, the total was 6152 patients. 3074 (50.0%) patients received early rehabilitation. The early rehabilitation group showed no difference in inpatient mortality (p = .438), improved BI efficiency (β = 0.86, p < .001), and shorter length of stay (β = -5.00, p = .018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI is associated with more efficient functional improvement and reduced hospital stays without an increase in inpatient mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13243\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:康复治疗对中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者非常重要。然而,早期康复的启动时机尚不明确,其安全性和有效性也不得而知:利用倾向得分分析和大型数据库研究中重度创伤性脑损伤患者早期康复的有效性和安全性:设计:回顾性队列研究:利用三级医疗机构的大型医疗数据库(JMDC 数据库)来比较早期康复和延迟康复的结果:患者:年龄在20岁至90岁之间、被诊断为创伤性脑损伤的急症医院住院患者。纳入标准为入院 7 天内接受康复治疗且入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为 3 至 12 分的患者。这项研究共纳入了3074名中度至重度创伤性脑损伤患者:根据创伤性脑损伤后开始康复的时间,患者被分为早期康复组(入院后 2 天内)和延迟康复组(入院后 3 到 7 天)。康复是指由物理、职业和/或言语/语言治疗师提供的任何类型或强度的干预。干预措施不受控制:主要结果是巴特尔指数(BI)效率(BI增益/住院时间)。次要结果包括 BI 增益(出院 BI - 入院 BI)、住院期间吸入性肺炎并发症发生率、出院回家、死亡率和住院时间:采用倾向性评分进行反概率加权后,患者总数为 6152 人。3074名(50.0%)患者接受了早期康复治疗。早期康复组患者的住院死亡率无差异(p = .438),BI 效率有所提高(β = 0.86,p 结论:早期康复组患者的住院死亡率无差异,BI 效率有所提高:中重度创伤性脑损伤患者接受早期康复治疗可更有效地改善功能,缩短住院时间,同时不会增加住院死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of early rehabilitation interventions in patients with traumatic brain injury using a large database.

Background: Rehabilitation is important for patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the timing of early rehabilitation initiation is ambiguous, and its safety and effectiveness are unknown.

Objective: To examine the effectiveness and safety of early rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI using propensity score analysis and a large database.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: A large medical database (JMDC database) of tertiary care facilities was used to compare outcomes of early and delayed rehabilitation.

Patients: Patients aged between 20 and 90 years who were diagnosed with TBI were admitted to acute care hospitals. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing rehabilitation within 7 days of admission with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 to 12 on admission. This study included 3074 patients with moderate-to-severe TBI.

Interventions: Patients were classified into an early rehabilitation group (within 2 days of admission) or a delayed rehabilitation group (3 to 7 days postadmission), depending on when rehabilitation started after TBI. Rehabilitation was defined as any type or intensity of intervention provided by a physical, occupational, and/or speech/language therapist. Interventions were not controlled.

Main outcome measure(s): The primary outcome was Barthel Index (BI) efficiency (BI gain/length of stay). Secondary outcomes included BI gain (discharge BI - admission BI), incidence of aspiration pneumonia complications during hospitalization, discharge to home, mortality, and length of stay.

Results: After applying inverse probability weighting with propensity scores, the total was 6152 patients. 3074 (50.0%) patients received early rehabilitation. The early rehabilitation group showed no difference in inpatient mortality (p = .438), improved BI efficiency (β = 0.86, p < .001), and shorter length of stay (β = -5.00, p = .018).

Conclusions: Early rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI is associated with more efficient functional improvement and reduced hospital stays without an increase in inpatient mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信