超越常规:放射头动静脉瘘非常规技术的系统回顾。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Muskan Fatima Bhojani, Javeria Malik, Asma Mumtaz, Ziad Sophie, Summaiyya Waseem
{"title":"超越常规:放射头动静脉瘘非常规技术的系统回顾。","authors":"Muskan Fatima Bhojani, Javeria Malik, Asma Mumtaz, Ziad Sophie, Summaiyya Waseem","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas (RC-AVFs), the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis, have high failure rates. New techniques like the no-touch technique (NTT) and modified no-touch technique (MNTT) have shown promising results. Our objective is to highlight the effectiveness of nonconventional techniques, aiming to address the challenge of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov until April 2023, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Five relevant articles were found, all involving human studies on NTT or MNTT for RC-AVF creation. We focused on primary and secondary patency rates, fistula maturation rates, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 5 studies as follows: 2 were pilot studies, 2 were prospective studies, and one was retrospective study. Three used NTT, and 2 used MNTT. Among double-arm studies, 3 out of 4 showed a significantly improved primary patency with nonconventional techniques. However, one study found no significant difference between nonconventional and conventional methods (90.5% vs. 84.2%; P = 0.225). In a single-arm study, nonconventional technique (NTT) displayed 54% primary patency at 1 year. Secondary patency rates were in 3 studies. One demonstrated significant secondary patency with nonconventional methods compared to conventional (90% vs. 67.5%; P = 0.028), while another found no significant difference (90.5% vs. 84.2%; P = 0.803). In the single-arm study, the nonconventional technique (NTT) revealed 80% secondary patency at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonconventional techniques (NTT and MNTT) show promise in improving patency rates, hinting at their potential as alternatives to the conventional technique for RC-AVF creation. Further studies are crucial to confirm their effectiveness and evaluate long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Conventional: A Systematic Review of Non-Conventional Techniques for Radio-Cephalic Arteriovenous Fistula.\",\"authors\":\"Muskan Fatima Bhojani, Javeria Malik, Asma Mumtaz, Ziad Sophie, Summaiyya Waseem\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas (RC-AVFs), the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis, have high failure rates. New techniques like the no-touch technique (NTT) and modified no-touch technique (MNTT) have shown promising results. Our objective is to highlight the effectiveness of nonconventional techniques, aiming to address the challenge of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov until April 2023, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Five relevant articles were found, all involving human studies on NTT or MNTT for RC-AVF creation. We focused on primary and secondary patency rates, fistula maturation rates, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 5 studies as follows: 2 were pilot studies, 2 were prospective studies, and one was retrospective study. Three used NTT, and 2 used MNTT. Among double-arm studies, 3 out of 4 showed a significantly improved primary patency with nonconventional techniques. However, one study found no significant difference between nonconventional and conventional methods (90.5% vs. 84.2%; P = 0.225). In a single-arm study, nonconventional technique (NTT) displayed 54% primary patency at 1 year. Secondary patency rates were in 3 studies. One demonstrated significant secondary patency with nonconventional methods compared to conventional (90% vs. 67.5%; P = 0.028), while another found no significant difference (90.5% vs. 84.2%; P = 0.803). In the single-arm study, the nonconventional technique (NTT) revealed 80% secondary patency at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonconventional techniques (NTT and MNTT) show promise in improving patency rates, hinting at their potential as alternatives to the conventional technique for RC-AVF creation. Further studies are crucial to confirm their effectiveness and evaluate long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.091\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无线电脑动静脉瘘(RC-AVF)是血液透析的首选血管通路,但其失败率很高。免接触技术(NTT)和改良免接触技术(MNTT)等新技术已显示出良好的效果。我们的目的是强调非常规技术的有效性,以应对 AVF 失败的挑战:我们按照《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)指南检索了 Medline、Google Scholar 和 Clinicaltrials.gov,直至 2023 年 4 月。我们找到了五篇相关文章,均涉及对用于创建 RC-AVF 的 NTT 或 MNTT 进行的人体研究。我们重点研究了一次和二次通畅率、瘘管成熟率和并发症:我们回顾了五项研究:两项试验性研究、两项前瞻性研究和一项回顾性研究。其中三项使用了 NTT,两项使用了 MNTT。在双臂研究中,四项研究中有三项显示,非常规技术能显著改善原发性通畅率。但有一项研究发现,非常规和常规方法之间没有明显差异(90.5% 对 84.2%;P=0.225)。在一项单臂研究中,非常规技术(NTT)一年后的一次通畅率为 54%。有三项研究显示了二次通畅率。一项研究显示,非常规方法的二次通畅率明显高于常规方法(90% 对 67.5%;P=0.028),而另一项研究则发现两者无明显差异(90.5% 对 84.2%;P=0.803)。在单臂研究中,非常规技术(NTT)一年后的二次通畅率为80%:结论:非常规技术(NTT 和 MNTT)有望提高通畅率,这表明它们有潜力替代传统技术进行 RC-AVF 创建。进一步的研究对确认其有效性和评估长期结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond Conventional: A Systematic Review of Non-Conventional Techniques for Radio-Cephalic Arteriovenous Fistula.

Background: Radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas (RC-AVFs), the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis, have high failure rates. New techniques like the no-touch technique (NTT) and modified no-touch technique (MNTT) have shown promising results. Our objective is to highlight the effectiveness of nonconventional techniques, aiming to address the challenge of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) failure.

Methods: We searched Medline, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov until April 2023, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Five relevant articles were found, all involving human studies on NTT or MNTT for RC-AVF creation. We focused on primary and secondary patency rates, fistula maturation rates, and complications.

Results: We reviewed 5 studies as follows: 2 were pilot studies, 2 were prospective studies, and one was retrospective study. Three used NTT, and 2 used MNTT. Among double-arm studies, 3 out of 4 showed a significantly improved primary patency with nonconventional techniques. However, one study found no significant difference between nonconventional and conventional methods (90.5% vs. 84.2%; P = 0.225). In a single-arm study, nonconventional technique (NTT) displayed 54% primary patency at 1 year. Secondary patency rates were in 3 studies. One demonstrated significant secondary patency with nonconventional methods compared to conventional (90% vs. 67.5%; P = 0.028), while another found no significant difference (90.5% vs. 84.2%; P = 0.803). In the single-arm study, the nonconventional technique (NTT) revealed 80% secondary patency at 1 year.

Conclusions: Nonconventional techniques (NTT and MNTT) show promise in improving patency rates, hinting at their potential as alternatives to the conventional technique for RC-AVF creation. Further studies are crucial to confirm their effectiveness and evaluate long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信