研究态度调查设计中明确 "无意见 "选项的使用情况

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS
Michael D. Mattei, Stephen J. Hellebusch, Matthew D. Mattei
{"title":"研究态度调查设计中明确 \"无意见 \"选项的使用情况","authors":"Michael D. Mattei, Stephen J. Hellebusch, Matthew D. Mattei","doi":"10.1177/14707853241269545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the impact of including or omitting an explicit “don’t know (DK)/no opinion (NO)” option in survey questionnaires. Three consecutive annual surveys were conducted using identical questionnaires, with variations in the inclusion of the DK/NO option. The study compares responses from the 2019 survey, which lacked a DK/NO option, to responses from the 2020 and 2021 surveys, which included this option. Utilizing a 7-point Likert scale, respondents were asked to indicate their opinions, with options ranging from extreme disagreement to extreme agreement, with a neutral midpoint. Statistical analysis, employing Two Sample Z-tests Between Proportions, assessed differences in the proportion of neutral responses between the surveys. Findings reveal that the inclusion of the DK/NO option did not significantly alter the proportion of neutral responses compared to surveys without this option. These results challenge the prevailing notion that explicit DK/NO options improve data quality.","PeriodicalId":47641,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Market Research","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the use of explicit ‘no opinion’ options in attitude survey design\",\"authors\":\"Michael D. Mattei, Stephen J. Hellebusch, Matthew D. Mattei\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14707853241269545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the impact of including or omitting an explicit “don’t know (DK)/no opinion (NO)” option in survey questionnaires. Three consecutive annual surveys were conducted using identical questionnaires, with variations in the inclusion of the DK/NO option. The study compares responses from the 2019 survey, which lacked a DK/NO option, to responses from the 2020 and 2021 surveys, which included this option. Utilizing a 7-point Likert scale, respondents were asked to indicate their opinions, with options ranging from extreme disagreement to extreme agreement, with a neutral midpoint. Statistical analysis, employing Two Sample Z-tests Between Proportions, assessed differences in the proportion of neutral responses between the surveys. Findings reveal that the inclusion of the DK/NO option did not significantly alter the proportion of neutral responses compared to surveys without this option. These results challenge the prevailing notion that explicit DK/NO options improve data quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Market Research\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Market Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853241269545\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Market Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853241269545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了在调查问卷中加入或不加入明确的 "不知道(DK)/无意见(NO)"选项的影响。我们使用相同的问卷连续进行了三次年度调查,但在加入 "不知道/无意见 "选项时有所变化。本研究比较了 2019 年调查(缺少 "DK/NO "选项)与 2020 年和 2021 年调查(包含该选项)的答复。调查采用 7 点李克特量表,要求受访者表明自己的观点,选项范围从极度不同意到极度同意,中间点为中性。统计分析采用了比例间双样本 Z 检验法,评估了不同调查之间中性回答比例的差异。结果显示,与不包含 "DK/NO "选项的调查相比,包含 "DK/NO "选项的调查并没有显著改变中立回答的比例。这些结果对 "明确的 DK/NO 选项可提高数据质量 "这一普遍观点提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the use of explicit ‘no opinion’ options in attitude survey design
This paper investigates the impact of including or omitting an explicit “don’t know (DK)/no opinion (NO)” option in survey questionnaires. Three consecutive annual surveys were conducted using identical questionnaires, with variations in the inclusion of the DK/NO option. The study compares responses from the 2019 survey, which lacked a DK/NO option, to responses from the 2020 and 2021 surveys, which included this option. Utilizing a 7-point Likert scale, respondents were asked to indicate their opinions, with options ranging from extreme disagreement to extreme agreement, with a neutral midpoint. Statistical analysis, employing Two Sample Z-tests Between Proportions, assessed differences in the proportion of neutral responses between the surveys. Findings reveal that the inclusion of the DK/NO option did not significantly alter the proportion of neutral responses compared to surveys without this option. These results challenge the prevailing notion that explicit DK/NO options improve data quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Market Research is the essential professional aid for users and providers of market research. IJMR will help you to: KEEP abreast of cutting-edge developments APPLY new research approaches to your business UNDERSTAND new tools and techniques LEARN from the world’s leading research thinkers STAY at the forefront of your profession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信