Romulo M. Lustosa, João Garcez-Filho, Marcos Seabra, Ricardo Puziol de Oliveira, Flávia Matarazzo, Maurício G. Araújo
{"title":"与窄直径植入物骨折相关的骨折率和风险因素:长期回顾性分析","authors":"Romulo M. Lustosa, João Garcez-Filho, Marcos Seabra, Ricardo Puziol de Oliveira, Flávia Matarazzo, Maurício G. Araújo","doi":"10.1111/clr.14334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this long-term retrospective study was to evaluate the fracture rate and the risk factors associated with the fracture of 3.3 mm narrow diameter implants (NDIs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 524 records of patients rehabilitated with 3.3 mm NDIs between 1997 and 2015 were assessed. Data on patients, implants, and prostheses were collected, and descriptive analysis of the variables was performed. NDIs were separated into 2 groups: “fractured” and “non-fractured”, and a multilevel logistic regression model was applied to identify the risk factors associated with NDI fracture.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-four patients were removed from the analysis for interrupting follow-up or presenting failures other than fractures. Of the 440 patients included (64.66 ± 13.4 years), 272 were females (61.8%), and 168 males (38.2%), and mean follow-up time was 129 ± 47.1 months. Of the 1428 NDIs, 15 (1.05%) in 9 patients (2.04%) fractured during the studied period. Ten fractures (66.66%) happened in 6 patients (66.66%) showing signs of parafunction. NDI with modified sandblasted, large grit, acid-etched surface was the only implant variable to show a protective statistical significance (<i>p</i> = .0439).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>NDI fracture was a rare event in the studied sample. NDIs manufactured with modified sandblasted, large grit, acid-etched surface may provide extra protection against NDI fracture. Patient-specific factors and implant characteristics should be carefully considered to limit the risk of fracture of 3.3 mm NDIs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"35 11","pages":"1467-1474"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fracture rate and risk factors associated with the fracture of narrow diameter implants: A long-term retrospective analysis\",\"authors\":\"Romulo M. Lustosa, João Garcez-Filho, Marcos Seabra, Ricardo Puziol de Oliveira, Flávia Matarazzo, Maurício G. Araújo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.14334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective of this long-term retrospective study was to evaluate the fracture rate and the risk factors associated with the fracture of 3.3 mm narrow diameter implants (NDIs).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 524 records of patients rehabilitated with 3.3 mm NDIs between 1997 and 2015 were assessed. Data on patients, implants, and prostheses were collected, and descriptive analysis of the variables was performed. NDIs were separated into 2 groups: “fractured” and “non-fractured”, and a multilevel logistic regression model was applied to identify the risk factors associated with NDI fracture.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighty-four patients were removed from the analysis for interrupting follow-up or presenting failures other than fractures. Of the 440 patients included (64.66 ± 13.4 years), 272 were females (61.8%), and 168 males (38.2%), and mean follow-up time was 129 ± 47.1 months. Of the 1428 NDIs, 15 (1.05%) in 9 patients (2.04%) fractured during the studied period. Ten fractures (66.66%) happened in 6 patients (66.66%) showing signs of parafunction. NDI with modified sandblasted, large grit, acid-etched surface was the only implant variable to show a protective statistical significance (<i>p</i> = .0439).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>NDI fracture was a rare event in the studied sample. NDIs manufactured with modified sandblasted, large grit, acid-etched surface may provide extra protection against NDI fracture. Patient-specific factors and implant characteristics should be carefully considered to limit the risk of fracture of 3.3 mm NDIs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\"35 11\",\"pages\":\"1467-1474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.14334\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.14334","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的这项长期回顾性研究的目的是评估 3.3 毫米窄直径种植体(NDI)的骨折率以及与之相关的风险因素:评估了1997年至2015年间使用3.3毫米窄直径种植体进行康复治疗的524名患者的记录。收集了患者、种植体和修复体的数据,并对变量进行了描述性分析。NDI 被分为两组:"应用多层次逻辑回归模型确定与NDI骨折相关的风险因素:84名患者因中断随访或出现骨折以外的其他故障而从分析中剔除。在纳入的 440 名患者(64.66 ± 13.4 岁)中,女性 272 名(61.8%),男性 168 名(38.2%),平均随访时间为 129 ± 47.1 个月。在 1428 例 NDI 中,有 9 名患者(2.04%)的 15 例(1.05%)在研究期间发生骨折。有 6 名患者(66.66%)的 10 处骨折(66.66%)显示出功能障碍的迹象。改良喷砂、大颗粒、酸蚀表面的 NDI 是唯一显示出保护性统计学意义(p = .0439)的种植体变量:结论:在所研究的样本中,NDI断裂的情况很少发生。采用改良喷砂、大颗粒、酸蚀表面制造的 NDI 可为防止 NDI 骨折提供额外保护。应仔细考虑患者的特定因素和植入物的特性,以限制 3.3 毫米 NDI 骨折的风险。
Fracture rate and risk factors associated with the fracture of narrow diameter implants: A long-term retrospective analysis
Objectives
The objective of this long-term retrospective study was to evaluate the fracture rate and the risk factors associated with the fracture of 3.3 mm narrow diameter implants (NDIs).
Materials and Methods
A total of 524 records of patients rehabilitated with 3.3 mm NDIs between 1997 and 2015 were assessed. Data on patients, implants, and prostheses were collected, and descriptive analysis of the variables was performed. NDIs were separated into 2 groups: “fractured” and “non-fractured”, and a multilevel logistic regression model was applied to identify the risk factors associated with NDI fracture.
Results
Eighty-four patients were removed from the analysis for interrupting follow-up or presenting failures other than fractures. Of the 440 patients included (64.66 ± 13.4 years), 272 were females (61.8%), and 168 males (38.2%), and mean follow-up time was 129 ± 47.1 months. Of the 1428 NDIs, 15 (1.05%) in 9 patients (2.04%) fractured during the studied period. Ten fractures (66.66%) happened in 6 patients (66.66%) showing signs of parafunction. NDI with modified sandblasted, large grit, acid-etched surface was the only implant variable to show a protective statistical significance (p = .0439).
Conclusions
NDI fracture was a rare event in the studied sample. NDIs manufactured with modified sandblasted, large grit, acid-etched surface may provide extra protection against NDI fracture. Patient-specific factors and implant characteristics should be carefully considered to limit the risk of fracture of 3.3 mm NDIs.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.