成人肿瘤患者免疫紊乱评估中的护理:范围综述。

Elsa Vitale, Tuğba Bilgehan, Annarita Fanizzi, Samantha Bove, Maria Colomba Comes, Raffaella Massafra, Bahar İnkaya
{"title":"成人肿瘤患者免疫紊乱评估中的护理:范围综述。","authors":"Elsa Vitale, Tuğba Bilgehan, Annarita Fanizzi, Samantha Bove, Maria Colomba Comes, Raffaella Massafra, Bahar İnkaya","doi":"10.2174/0118715303295330240719115132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International guidelines recommend a pathway for preferable nursing handling in a specific cancer topic, like chemotherapy toxicity, low adhesion in toxicity reported with a consequential increase in adverse events (AEs) frequency, poorer QoL outcomes, and increased use of healthcare service until death. Unpredictability, postponed reports, and incapability to access healthcare services can compromise toxicity-related effects by including patients' safety. In this scenario, a more attentive nursing intervention can improve patients' outcomes and decrease costs for healthcare services, respectively. The present scoping review aims to describe and synthesize scientific care nursing evidence assessment in oncology patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Nursing & Allied Health Database, and British Nursing were the databases examined. Keywords used and associated with Boolean operators were assessment, care, nursing, immune disorder, oncology, and patient. Research articles considered were published between 2013-2023. All systematic processes were performed according to the PRISMA procedure in order to reach all manuscripts considered in the present scoping review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Embase database showed a total of 25 articles, PubMed displayed 77, the Nursing & Allied Health Database evidenced a total of 74, and the British Nursing database showed 252 records. Then, after a first revision in each database by considering the inclusion criteria, the abovementioned titles and abstracts were selected and, 336 records were removed, and 92 studies remained. Of these, 65 manuscripts were excluded after verifying abstracts. Finally, a total of 7 articles were carefully analysed and selected for this scoping review. Specifically, 2 articles belonged to the British Nursing Database, 3 articles belonged to Embase, 1 to the Nursing & Allied Health Database and one related to PubMed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oncology nursing should consider several aspects, such as therapy-related toxicity and its related morbidity and mortality, worsening levels of quality of life, and increasing duty by the healthcare organization or endorsements for the principal symptoms and signs which may anticipate few diseases and worst clinical conditions, too. Therefore, careful monitoring may allow prompt recognition and subsequent earlier management in the treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94316,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care Nursing in Immune Disorder Assessment among Adult Oncology Patients: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Elsa Vitale, Tuğba Bilgehan, Annarita Fanizzi, Samantha Bove, Maria Colomba Comes, Raffaella Massafra, Bahar İnkaya\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0118715303295330240719115132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International guidelines recommend a pathway for preferable nursing handling in a specific cancer topic, like chemotherapy toxicity, low adhesion in toxicity reported with a consequential increase in adverse events (AEs) frequency, poorer QoL outcomes, and increased use of healthcare service until death. Unpredictability, postponed reports, and incapability to access healthcare services can compromise toxicity-related effects by including patients' safety. In this scenario, a more attentive nursing intervention can improve patients' outcomes and decrease costs for healthcare services, respectively. The present scoping review aims to describe and synthesize scientific care nursing evidence assessment in oncology patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Nursing & Allied Health Database, and British Nursing were the databases examined. Keywords used and associated with Boolean operators were assessment, care, nursing, immune disorder, oncology, and patient. Research articles considered were published between 2013-2023. All systematic processes were performed according to the PRISMA procedure in order to reach all manuscripts considered in the present scoping review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Embase database showed a total of 25 articles, PubMed displayed 77, the Nursing & Allied Health Database evidenced a total of 74, and the British Nursing database showed 252 records. Then, after a first revision in each database by considering the inclusion criteria, the abovementioned titles and abstracts were selected and, 336 records were removed, and 92 studies remained. Of these, 65 manuscripts were excluded after verifying abstracts. Finally, a total of 7 articles were carefully analysed and selected for this scoping review. Specifically, 2 articles belonged to the British Nursing Database, 3 articles belonged to Embase, 1 to the Nursing & Allied Health Database and one related to PubMed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oncology nursing should consider several aspects, such as therapy-related toxicity and its related morbidity and mortality, worsening levels of quality of life, and increasing duty by the healthcare organization or endorsements for the principal symptoms and signs which may anticipate few diseases and worst clinical conditions, too. Therefore, careful monitoring may allow prompt recognition and subsequent earlier management in the treatment efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715303295330240719115132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715303295330240719115132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际指南推荐了一种在特定癌症主题(如化疗毒性)中进行最佳护理处理的途径,但毒性报告的粘附性低会导致不良事件(AEs)频率增加、QoL 结果较差、医疗服务使用增加直至死亡。不可预测性、推迟报告和无法获得医疗服务会影响与毒性相关的效果,包括患者的安全。在这种情况下,更周到的护理干预可分别改善患者的预后和降低医疗服务成本。本范围综述旨在描述和综合肿瘤患者科学护理的护理证据评估:方法:查阅了 PubMed、Embase、护理与联合健康数据库和英国护理数据库。使用的关键词包括评估、护理、护理、免疫紊乱、肿瘤学和患者。考虑的研究文章发表于 2013-2023 年间。所有系统过程均按照PRISMA程序进行,以获得本范围综述所考虑的所有手稿:Embase数据库共显示了25篇文章,PubMed显示了77篇文章,护理与联合健康数据库共显示了74篇文章,英国护理数据库显示了252条记录。然后,根据纳入标准对每个数据库进行了第一次修订,选择了上述标题和摘要,删除了 336 条记录,剩下 92 项研究。其中,65 篇稿件在核实摘要后被排除。最后,经过仔细分析,共筛选出 7 篇文章用于本次范围界定综述。其中,2 篇属于英国护理数据库,3 篇属于 Embase,1 篇属于护理与联合健康数据库,1 篇与 PubMed 有关:肿瘤护理应考虑多个方面,如与治疗相关的毒性及其相关的发病率和死亡率、生活质量水平的恶化、医疗机构或认可的主要症状和体征责任的增加,这些症状和体征也可能预示着少数疾病和最坏的临床状况。因此,仔细监测可以及时发现并在随后更早地对治疗效果进行管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Care Nursing in Immune Disorder Assessment among Adult Oncology Patients: A Scoping Review.

Background: International guidelines recommend a pathway for preferable nursing handling in a specific cancer topic, like chemotherapy toxicity, low adhesion in toxicity reported with a consequential increase in adverse events (AEs) frequency, poorer QoL outcomes, and increased use of healthcare service until death. Unpredictability, postponed reports, and incapability to access healthcare services can compromise toxicity-related effects by including patients' safety. In this scenario, a more attentive nursing intervention can improve patients' outcomes and decrease costs for healthcare services, respectively. The present scoping review aims to describe and synthesize scientific care nursing evidence assessment in oncology patients.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Nursing & Allied Health Database, and British Nursing were the databases examined. Keywords used and associated with Boolean operators were assessment, care, nursing, immune disorder, oncology, and patient. Research articles considered were published between 2013-2023. All systematic processes were performed according to the PRISMA procedure in order to reach all manuscripts considered in the present scoping review.

Results: The Embase database showed a total of 25 articles, PubMed displayed 77, the Nursing & Allied Health Database evidenced a total of 74, and the British Nursing database showed 252 records. Then, after a first revision in each database by considering the inclusion criteria, the abovementioned titles and abstracts were selected and, 336 records were removed, and 92 studies remained. Of these, 65 manuscripts were excluded after verifying abstracts. Finally, a total of 7 articles were carefully analysed and selected for this scoping review. Specifically, 2 articles belonged to the British Nursing Database, 3 articles belonged to Embase, 1 to the Nursing & Allied Health Database and one related to PubMed.

Conclusion: Oncology nursing should consider several aspects, such as therapy-related toxicity and its related morbidity and mortality, worsening levels of quality of life, and increasing duty by the healthcare organization or endorsements for the principal symptoms and signs which may anticipate few diseases and worst clinical conditions, too. Therefore, careful monitoring may allow prompt recognition and subsequent earlier management in the treatment efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信