Evaluating acute nipple inversion, imaging findings and outcomes

Purpose

Acute nipple inversion can be unsettling for patients and is sometimes associated with an underlying breast malignancy. It also poses a diagnostic challenge with lack of consensus management guidelines. This study reviewed institutional experience with new nipple inversion, including malignant association, imaging utilization, and outcomes, in an effort to improve management.

Methods

A multisite institutional retrospective review was conducted of all breast imaging reports from 1/2010 to 6/2022 mentioning nipple inversion as an indication or finding. Patients with new nipple inversion, defined as arising since the time of last breast imaging exam or if reported as new by the patient/provider, were included for analysis. Retroareolar imaging findings, BI-RADS assessments/recommendations, pathology obtained from percutaneous or excisional biopsies, and follow-up imaging and clinical exams were collated. Cases of chronic or stable nipple inversion were excluded. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results

A total of 414 patients had new nipple inversion, 387/414 (93.5 %) with benign or negative results at initial imaging and 27/414 (6.5 %) with malignant lesions. Diagnostic mammography/ultrasound detected 25/27 (92.6 %) cancers (sensitivity 92.6 %, specificity 75.5 %, PPV 20.8 %, NPV 99.3 %). Of 62 breast MRI exams performed in patients with negative mammogram/ultrasound, no cancers were detected in the retroareolar space with 2 incidental malignant lesions discovered distant from the nipple.

Conclusion

Diagnostic mammography/ultrasound is reliable in workups of acute nipple inversion, with a high sensitivity and NPV for excluding malignancy. Breast MRI and surgical referral should be reserved for patients with suspicious associated symptoms or clinical findings.