法国重症监护病房意外拔管发生率及其结果的前瞻性多中心评估。安全重症监护室研究。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jérémie Guillemin , Benjamin Rieu , Olivier Huet , Léonie Villeret , Stéphanie Pons , Anne Bignon , Quentin de Roux , Raphaël Cinotti , Vincent Legros , Gaëtan Plantefeve , Claire Dayhot-Fizelier , Edris Omar , Cyril Cadoz , Fanny Bounes , Cécile Caplin , Karim Toumert , Thibault Martinez , Damien Bouvier , Maxime Coutrot , Thomas Godet , Florian Blanchard
{"title":"法国重症监护病房意外拔管发生率及其结果的前瞻性多中心评估。安全重症监护室研究。","authors":"Jérémie Guillemin ,&nbsp;Benjamin Rieu ,&nbsp;Olivier Huet ,&nbsp;Léonie Villeret ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Pons ,&nbsp;Anne Bignon ,&nbsp;Quentin de Roux ,&nbsp;Raphaël Cinotti ,&nbsp;Vincent Legros ,&nbsp;Gaëtan Plantefeve ,&nbsp;Claire Dayhot-Fizelier ,&nbsp;Edris Omar ,&nbsp;Cyril Cadoz ,&nbsp;Fanny Bounes ,&nbsp;Cécile Caplin ,&nbsp;Karim Toumert ,&nbsp;Thibault Martinez ,&nbsp;Damien Bouvier ,&nbsp;Maxime Coutrot ,&nbsp;Thomas Godet ,&nbsp;Florian Blanchard","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We aimed to determine the epidemiology and outcomes of unplanned extubation (UE), both accidental and self-extubation, in ICU.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted in 47 French ICUs. The number of mechanical ventilation (MV) days, and planned and unplanned extubation were recorded in each center over a minimum period of three consecutive months to evaluate UE incidence. Patient characteristics, UE environmental factors, and outcomes were compared based on the UE mechanism (accidental or self-extubation). Self-extubation outcomes were compared with planned extubation using a propensity-matched population. Finally, risk factors for extubation failure (re-intubation before day 7) were determined following self-extubation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the 12-month inclusion period, we found a pooled UE incidence of 1.0 per 100 MV days. UE accounted for 9% of all endotracheal removals. Of the 605 UE, 88% were self-extubation and 12% were accidental-extubations. The latter had a worse prognosis than self-extubation (34% <em>vs.</em> 8% ICU-mortality, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Self-extubation did not increase mortality compared with planned extubation (8% <em>vs.</em> 11%, <em>p</em> = 0.075). Regardless of the type of extubation, planned or unplanned, extubation failure was independently associated with a poor outcome. Cancer, higher respiratory rate, lower PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> at the time of extubation, weaning process not-ongoing, and immediate post-extubation respiratory failure were independent predictors of failed self-extubation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Unplanned extubation, mostly represented by self-extubation, is common in ICU and accounts for 9% of all endotracheal extubations. While accidental extubations are a serious and infrequent adverse event, self-extubation does not increase mortality compared to planned extubation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"43 5","pages":"Article 101411"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective multi-center evaluation of the incidence of unplanned extubation and its outcomes in French intensive care units. The Safe-ICU study\",\"authors\":\"Jérémie Guillemin ,&nbsp;Benjamin Rieu ,&nbsp;Olivier Huet ,&nbsp;Léonie Villeret ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Pons ,&nbsp;Anne Bignon ,&nbsp;Quentin de Roux ,&nbsp;Raphaël Cinotti ,&nbsp;Vincent Legros ,&nbsp;Gaëtan Plantefeve ,&nbsp;Claire Dayhot-Fizelier ,&nbsp;Edris Omar ,&nbsp;Cyril Cadoz ,&nbsp;Fanny Bounes ,&nbsp;Cécile Caplin ,&nbsp;Karim Toumert ,&nbsp;Thibault Martinez ,&nbsp;Damien Bouvier ,&nbsp;Maxime Coutrot ,&nbsp;Thomas Godet ,&nbsp;Florian Blanchard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We aimed to determine the epidemiology and outcomes of unplanned extubation (UE), both accidental and self-extubation, in ICU.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted in 47 French ICUs. The number of mechanical ventilation (MV) days, and planned and unplanned extubation were recorded in each center over a minimum period of three consecutive months to evaluate UE incidence. Patient characteristics, UE environmental factors, and outcomes were compared based on the UE mechanism (accidental or self-extubation). Self-extubation outcomes were compared with planned extubation using a propensity-matched population. Finally, risk factors for extubation failure (re-intubation before day 7) were determined following self-extubation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the 12-month inclusion period, we found a pooled UE incidence of 1.0 per 100 MV days. UE accounted for 9% of all endotracheal removals. Of the 605 UE, 88% were self-extubation and 12% were accidental-extubations. The latter had a worse prognosis than self-extubation (34% <em>vs.</em> 8% ICU-mortality, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Self-extubation did not increase mortality compared with planned extubation (8% <em>vs.</em> 11%, <em>p</em> = 0.075). Regardless of the type of extubation, planned or unplanned, extubation failure was independently associated with a poor outcome. Cancer, higher respiratory rate, lower PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> at the time of extubation, weaning process not-ongoing, and immediate post-extubation respiratory failure were independent predictors of failed self-extubation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Unplanned extubation, mostly represented by self-extubation, is common in ICU and accounts for 9% of all endotracheal extubations. While accidental extubations are a serious and infrequent adverse event, self-extubation does not increase mortality compared to planned extubation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"43 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000699\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们旨在确定重症监护室意外拔管和自行拔管的流行病学和结果:在法国 47 家重症监护室开展了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。每个中心至少连续三个月记录机械通气(MV)天数、计划内和计划外拔管次数,以评估 UE 发生率。根据 UE 机制(意外拔管或自行拔管)对患者特征、UE 环境因素和结果进行了比较。利用倾向匹配人群对自行拔管与计划拔管的结果进行了比较。最后,确定了自我拔管后拔管失败(第 7 天前再次插管)的风险因素:结果:在为期 12 个月的纳入期内,我们发现每 100 个 MV 天的 UE 发生率为 1.0。UE占所有气管插管拔除率的9%。在 605 例 UE 中,88% 为自行拔管,12% 为意外拔管。后者比自行拔管的预后更差(34%vs.8%的ICU死亡率,拔管时的p 2/FiO2、断奶过程未持续、拔管后立即出现呼吸衰竭是自行拔管失败的独立预测因素):结论:非计划性拔管(主要表现为自行拔管)在重症监护病房很常见,占所有气管内拔管的 9%。虽然意外拔管是一种严重且不常见的不良事件,但与计划拔管相比,自行拔管不会增加死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective multi-center evaluation of the incidence of unplanned extubation and its outcomes in French intensive care units. The Safe-ICU study

Background

We aimed to determine the epidemiology and outcomes of unplanned extubation (UE), both accidental and self-extubation, in ICU.

Methods

A multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted in 47 French ICUs. The number of mechanical ventilation (MV) days, and planned and unplanned extubation were recorded in each center over a minimum period of three consecutive months to evaluate UE incidence. Patient characteristics, UE environmental factors, and outcomes were compared based on the UE mechanism (accidental or self-extubation). Self-extubation outcomes were compared with planned extubation using a propensity-matched population. Finally, risk factors for extubation failure (re-intubation before day 7) were determined following self-extubation.

Results

During the 12-month inclusion period, we found a pooled UE incidence of 1.0 per 100 MV days. UE accounted for 9% of all endotracheal removals. Of the 605 UE, 88% were self-extubation and 12% were accidental-extubations. The latter had a worse prognosis than self-extubation (34% vs. 8% ICU-mortality, p < 0.001). Self-extubation did not increase mortality compared with planned extubation (8% vs. 11%, p = 0.075). Regardless of the type of extubation, planned or unplanned, extubation failure was independently associated with a poor outcome. Cancer, higher respiratory rate, lower PaO2/FiO2 at the time of extubation, weaning process not-ongoing, and immediate post-extubation respiratory failure were independent predictors of failed self-extubation.

Conclusion

Unplanned extubation, mostly represented by self-extubation, is common in ICU and accounts for 9% of all endotracheal extubations. While accidental extubations are a serious and infrequent adverse event, self-extubation does not increase mortality compared to planned extubation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信