评估医护人员对疼痛概念和信念的看法。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sejun Oh, Yeonji Gu, Inbeom Kim, Euha Kwon, Sangheon Lee, Kyounghae Kim
{"title":"评估医护人员对疼痛概念和信念的看法。","authors":"Sejun Oh, Yeonji Gu, Inbeom Kim, Euha Kwon, Sangheon Lee, Kyounghae Kim","doi":"10.3233/NRE-240081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare professionals deliver pain education, yet their perception of pain experiences is not well understood, which can affect their interactions with patients in pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored Korean healthcare professionals' perceptions of the usefulness of assessing pain concepts and beliefs and the importance of domains identified in the pain literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study employed an online survey administered to nurses, physical therapists, and physicians, including the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and related optional open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants acknowledged the importance and usefulness of assessing understanding of pain concepts but anticipated patients' difficulty comprehending items assessing biological mechanisms underlying pain. Participants questioned the items' accuracy, indicating their limited pain knowledge and the necessity of reducing literacy demands. The critical domains of pain education were learning about pain, external factors influencing pain, and pain as a form of protection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants had suboptimal pain knowledge but emphasized decreasing literacy demands of pain neurophysiology items. Additionally, it is necessary to develop and implement a pain education program to improve pain-related knowledge and provide educational content for healthcare professionals encountering patients in pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing healthcare professionals' perceptions of pain concepts and beliefs.\",\"authors\":\"Sejun Oh, Yeonji Gu, Inbeom Kim, Euha Kwon, Sangheon Lee, Kyounghae Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/NRE-240081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare professionals deliver pain education, yet their perception of pain experiences is not well understood, which can affect their interactions with patients in pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored Korean healthcare professionals' perceptions of the usefulness of assessing pain concepts and beliefs and the importance of domains identified in the pain literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study employed an online survey administered to nurses, physical therapists, and physicians, including the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and related optional open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants acknowledged the importance and usefulness of assessing understanding of pain concepts but anticipated patients' difficulty comprehending items assessing biological mechanisms underlying pain. Participants questioned the items' accuracy, indicating their limited pain knowledge and the necessity of reducing literacy demands. The critical domains of pain education were learning about pain, external factors influencing pain, and pain as a form of protection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants had suboptimal pain knowledge but emphasized decreasing literacy demands of pain neurophysiology items. Additionally, it is necessary to develop and implement a pain education program to improve pain-related knowledge and provide educational content for healthcare professionals encountering patients in pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-240081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-240081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医护人员提供疼痛教育,但他们对疼痛体验的感知却不甚了解,这可能会影响他们与疼痛患者的互动:医护人员提供疼痛教育,但他们对疼痛体验的感知却不甚了解,这可能会影响他们与疼痛患者的互动:本研究探讨了韩国医护人员对评估疼痛概念和信念的有用性以及疼痛文献中确定的领域的重要性的看法:这项描述性横断面研究采用了一项在线调查,调查对象包括护士、理疗师和医生,内容包括疼痛神经生理学问卷、坦帕运动恐惧症量表以及相关的开放式选题:大多数参与者承认评估对疼痛概念理解的重要性和实用性,但预计患者难以理解评估疼痛生物机制的项目。参与者对项目的准确性提出了质疑,这表明他们的疼痛知识有限,有必要降低对读写能力的要求。疼痛教育的关键领域是了解疼痛、影响疼痛的外部因素以及疼痛作为一种保护形式:结论:受试者对疼痛的了解程度不够理想,但他们强调要降低对疼痛神经生理学项目的识字要求。此外,有必要制定和实施疼痛教育计划,以提高疼痛相关知识,并为遇到疼痛患者的医护人员提供教育内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing healthcare professionals' perceptions of pain concepts and beliefs.

Background: Healthcare professionals deliver pain education, yet their perception of pain experiences is not well understood, which can affect their interactions with patients in pain.

Objective: This study explored Korean healthcare professionals' perceptions of the usefulness of assessing pain concepts and beliefs and the importance of domains identified in the pain literature.

Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study employed an online survey administered to nurses, physical therapists, and physicians, including the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and related optional open-ended questions.

Results: Most participants acknowledged the importance and usefulness of assessing understanding of pain concepts but anticipated patients' difficulty comprehending items assessing biological mechanisms underlying pain. Participants questioned the items' accuracy, indicating their limited pain knowledge and the necessity of reducing literacy demands. The critical domains of pain education were learning about pain, external factors influencing pain, and pain as a form of protection.

Conclusion: Participants had suboptimal pain knowledge but emphasized decreasing literacy demands of pain neurophysiology items. Additionally, it is necessary to develop and implement a pain education program to improve pain-related knowledge and provide educational content for healthcare professionals encountering patients in pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信