[头颈外科中的人工智能:潜力、挑战和伦理考虑]。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Lukas S Fiedler, Tobias Meyer, Stefanie Hüttemann
{"title":"[头颈外科中的人工智能:潜力、挑战和伦理考虑]。","authors":"Lukas S Fiedler, Tobias Meyer, Stefanie Hüttemann","doi":"10.1055/a-2369-0263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing prominence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medicine introduces both transformative possibilities and potential challenges. Our study focuses on the current status and perceptions of AI in Head and Neck Surgery (HNS), examining its utilization, benefits, ethical concerns, and protective measures.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aims to illuminate the existing landscape of AI in HNS in Germany.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Conducted through a questionnaire, key aspects include its current usage, potential applications (e.g., diagnosis, surgical planning), anticipated benefits (e.g., improved patient care ), and significant ethical concerns (e.g., miscalculations by AI, data privacy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey reveals limited AI adoption in HNS, with substantial potential for improvement. Ethical considerations, especially miscalculations by AI and data privacy, emerge as central issues. The survey emphasizes the crucial role of physician control and the need for legal oversight to address concerns related to AI integration. While AI's presence in HNS is modest, the study identifies opportunities for enhancement. Ethical guidelines and practitioner-centric control are vital for discussions surrounding AI integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research underscores the significance of ethical considerations and practitioner control in the context of AI in surgical practices. It highlights the demand for targeted training to empower practitioners in navigating the complexities of AI technologies in healthcare, ensuring responsible and patient-centric implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17965,"journal":{"name":"Laryngo-rhino-otologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Surgery: Potentials, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations].\",\"authors\":\"Lukas S Fiedler, Tobias Meyer, Stefanie Hüttemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2369-0263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing prominence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medicine introduces both transformative possibilities and potential challenges. Our study focuses on the current status and perceptions of AI in Head and Neck Surgery (HNS), examining its utilization, benefits, ethical concerns, and protective measures.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aims to illuminate the existing landscape of AI in HNS in Germany.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Conducted through a questionnaire, key aspects include its current usage, potential applications (e.g., diagnosis, surgical planning), anticipated benefits (e.g., improved patient care ), and significant ethical concerns (e.g., miscalculations by AI, data privacy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey reveals limited AI adoption in HNS, with substantial potential for improvement. Ethical considerations, especially miscalculations by AI and data privacy, emerge as central issues. The survey emphasizes the crucial role of physician control and the need for legal oversight to address concerns related to AI integration. While AI's presence in HNS is modest, the study identifies opportunities for enhancement. Ethical guidelines and practitioner-centric control are vital for discussions surrounding AI integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research underscores the significance of ethical considerations and practitioner control in the context of AI in surgical practices. It highlights the demand for targeted training to empower practitioners in navigating the complexities of AI technologies in healthcare, ensuring responsible and patient-centric implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngo-rhino-otologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngo-rhino-otologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2369-0263\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngo-rhino-otologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2369-0263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工智能(AI)在医学领域的应用日益突出,既带来了变革的可能性,也带来了潜在的挑战。我们的研究侧重于人工智能在头颈外科(HNS)中的现状和认知,探讨其应用、益处、伦理问题和保护措施:研究旨在阐明德国头颈外科人工智能的现状:通过问卷调查,主要内容包括其当前使用情况、潜在应用(如诊断、手术规划)、预期效益(如改善患者护理)以及重大伦理问题(如人工智能的误判、数据隐私):调查显示,人工智能在 HNS 中的应用有限,但仍有很大的改进空间。伦理方面的考虑,尤其是人工智能的误判和数据隐私,成为核心问题。调查强调了医生控制的关键作用以及法律监督的必要性,以解决与人工智能整合相关的问题。虽然人工智能在 HNS 中的应用还不多,但这项研究指出了改进的机会。伦理准则和以从业人员为中心的控制对于围绕人工智能整合的讨论至关重要:这项研究强调了人工智能在外科实践中的伦理考虑和从业人员控制的重要性。它强调了有必要开展有针对性的培训,以增强从业人员驾驭医疗保健领域人工智能技术复杂性的能力,确保负责任地、以患者为中心地实施人工智能技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Surgery: Potentials, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations].

Background: The growing prominence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medicine introduces both transformative possibilities and potential challenges. Our study focuses on the current status and perceptions of AI in Head and Neck Surgery (HNS), examining its utilization, benefits, ethical concerns, and protective measures.

Objectives: The study aims to illuminate the existing landscape of AI in HNS in Germany.

Materials and methods: Conducted through a questionnaire, key aspects include its current usage, potential applications (e.g., diagnosis, surgical planning), anticipated benefits (e.g., improved patient care ), and significant ethical concerns (e.g., miscalculations by AI, data privacy).

Results: The survey reveals limited AI adoption in HNS, with substantial potential for improvement. Ethical considerations, especially miscalculations by AI and data privacy, emerge as central issues. The survey emphasizes the crucial role of physician control and the need for legal oversight to address concerns related to AI integration. While AI's presence in HNS is modest, the study identifies opportunities for enhancement. Ethical guidelines and practitioner-centric control are vital for discussions surrounding AI integration.

Conclusions: This research underscores the significance of ethical considerations and practitioner control in the context of AI in surgical practices. It highlights the demand for targeted training to empower practitioners in navigating the complexities of AI technologies in healthcare, ensuring responsible and patient-centric implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngo-rhino-otologie
Laryngo-rhino-otologie 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
30.00%
发文量
1399
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie ist die deutschsprachige Fachzeitschrift für Ärzte in Klinik und Praxis mit Fokus auf die Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie. Die Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie bringt die Themen, die Sie wirklich interessieren und in der täglichen Arbeit unterstützen: Kurze, leicht lesbare Beiträge, interessante Rubriken und Originalarbeiten mit Relevanz für Ihre Arbeit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信