采用配对设计的两种诊断检测的加权卡帕系数之差和之比的渐近置信区间

Jose Antonio Roldan-Nofuentes, Saad bouh Sidaty-regad
{"title":"采用配对设计的两种诊断检测的加权卡帕系数之差和之比的渐近置信区间","authors":"Jose Antonio Roldan-Nofuentes, Saad bouh Sidaty-regad","doi":"arxiv-2407.21387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The weighted kappa coefficient of a binary diagnostic test is a measure of\nthe beyond-chance agreement between the diagnostic test and the gold standard,\nand depends on the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test, on the\ndisease prevalence and on the relative importance between the false positives\nand the false negatives. This article studies the comparison of the weighted\nkappa coefficients of two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design\nthrough confidence intervals. Three asymptotic confidence intervals are studied\nfor the difference between the parameters and five other intervals for the\nratio. Simulation experiments were carried out to study the coverage\nprobabilities and the average lengths of the intervals, giving some general\nrules for application. A method is also proposed to calculate the sample size\nnecessary to compare the two weighted kappa coefficients through a confidence\ninterval. A program in R has been written to solve the problem studied and it\nis available as supplementary material. The results were applied to a real\nexample of the diagnosis of malaria.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymptotic confidence intervals for the difference and the ratio of the weighted kappa coefficients of two diagnostic tests subject to a paired design\",\"authors\":\"Jose Antonio Roldan-Nofuentes, Saad bouh Sidaty-regad\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.21387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The weighted kappa coefficient of a binary diagnostic test is a measure of\\nthe beyond-chance agreement between the diagnostic test and the gold standard,\\nand depends on the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test, on the\\ndisease prevalence and on the relative importance between the false positives\\nand the false negatives. This article studies the comparison of the weighted\\nkappa coefficients of two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design\\nthrough confidence intervals. Three asymptotic confidence intervals are studied\\nfor the difference between the parameters and five other intervals for the\\nratio. Simulation experiments were carried out to study the coverage\\nprobabilities and the average lengths of the intervals, giving some general\\nrules for application. A method is also proposed to calculate the sample size\\nnecessary to compare the two weighted kappa coefficients through a confidence\\ninterval. A program in R has been written to solve the problem studied and it\\nis available as supplementary material. The results were applied to a real\\nexample of the diagnosis of malaria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.21387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.21387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

二元诊断检测的加权卡帕系数是对诊断检测与金标准之间机会外一致性的衡量,它取决于诊断检测的灵敏度和特异性、疾病流行率以及假阳性和假阴性之间的相对重要性。本文通过置信区间研究了两种二元诊断检测的加权卡帕系数的比较。研究了参数差异的三个渐近置信区间和比率的其他五个置信区间。通过模拟实验研究了区间的覆盖概率和平均长度,并给出了一些应用的一般规则。此外,还提出了一种方法来计算通过置信区间比较两个加权卡帕系数所需的样本大小。为解决所研究的问题,我们用 R 语言编写了一个程序,并将其作为补充材料提供。研究结果已应用于疟疾诊断的实际案例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asymptotic confidence intervals for the difference and the ratio of the weighted kappa coefficients of two diagnostic tests subject to a paired design
The weighted kappa coefficient of a binary diagnostic test is a measure of the beyond-chance agreement between the diagnostic test and the gold standard, and depends on the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test, on the disease prevalence and on the relative importance between the false positives and the false negatives. This article studies the comparison of the weighted kappa coefficients of two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design through confidence intervals. Three asymptotic confidence intervals are studied for the difference between the parameters and five other intervals for the ratio. Simulation experiments were carried out to study the coverage probabilities and the average lengths of the intervals, giving some general rules for application. A method is also proposed to calculate the sample size necessary to compare the two weighted kappa coefficients through a confidence interval. A program in R has been written to solve the problem studied and it is available as supplementary material. The results were applied to a real example of the diagnosis of malaria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信