利用 DEMATEL 和 COPRAS 方法分析城市及周边绿地(卡拉杰市西部)

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Z. Aboutalebi, S. B. Kafaky, H. Aliani
{"title":"利用 DEMATEL 和 COPRAS 方法分析城市及周边绿地(卡拉杰市西部)","authors":"Z. Aboutalebi, S. B. Kafaky, H. Aliani","doi":"10.1007/s13762-024-05882-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Considering the important role and beneficial effects of green spaces in maintaining the ecological balance of the cities, determining the best location is one of the fundamental issues, which is the main goal of this study. In this study, ecological and socio-economic criteria were identified based on experts’ opinions and Delphi method and quantified using fuzzy methods. Several multi-criteria evaluation methods, including the analytic network process, DEMATEL technique, weighted linear combination and COPRAS method, were then used to evaluate the development of green space.</p><p>The results of the DEMATEL technique showed that the land use indicator has the highest interaction, and the distance from the police station has the least interaction with other indicators. In addition, altitude was the most effective indicator, and land use was the most impressionable indicator. The ANP method also revealed that land use and vegetation density with a final weight equal to 0.572 and 0.312 were the most important indicator in site selection. The results of weighted linear combination and CPORAS methods indicated that zone 6 and its districts, due to lower erosion, higher rainfall, better soil conditions, and wasteland is a more suitable location for green space development.</p><p>In general, the results showed that the methods used in this study, due to high flexibility and accuracy in presenting the results, can be a good alternative for other weighting, locating and ranking methods. Hence, the proposed options by these methods can be selected with higher certainty as a proper location for creating green space.</p>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of urban and peripheral green spaces using DEMATEL & COPRAS methods (West of Karaj city)\",\"authors\":\"Z. Aboutalebi, S. B. Kafaky, H. Aliani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13762-024-05882-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Considering the important role and beneficial effects of green spaces in maintaining the ecological balance of the cities, determining the best location is one of the fundamental issues, which is the main goal of this study. In this study, ecological and socio-economic criteria were identified based on experts’ opinions and Delphi method and quantified using fuzzy methods. Several multi-criteria evaluation methods, including the analytic network process, DEMATEL technique, weighted linear combination and COPRAS method, were then used to evaluate the development of green space.</p><p>The results of the DEMATEL technique showed that the land use indicator has the highest interaction, and the distance from the police station has the least interaction with other indicators. In addition, altitude was the most effective indicator, and land use was the most impressionable indicator. The ANP method also revealed that land use and vegetation density with a final weight equal to 0.572 and 0.312 were the most important indicator in site selection. The results of weighted linear combination and CPORAS methods indicated that zone 6 and its districts, due to lower erosion, higher rainfall, better soil conditions, and wasteland is a more suitable location for green space development.</p><p>In general, the results showed that the methods used in this study, due to high flexibility and accuracy in presenting the results, can be a good alternative for other weighting, locating and ranking methods. Hence, the proposed options by these methods can be selected with higher certainty as a proper location for creating green space.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05882-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05882-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到绿地在维护城市生态平衡方面的重要作用和有益影响,确定最佳位置是基本问题之一,也是本研究的主要目标。在本研究中,根据专家意见和德尔菲法确定了生态和社会经济标准,并使用模糊方法进行了量化。分析网络过程、DEMATEL 技术、加权线性组合和 COPRAS 法等几种多标准评价方法被用来评价绿地的发展。DEMATEL 技术的结果表明,土地利用指标的交互作用最大,而与派出所的距离与其他指标的交互作用最小。此外,海拔高度是最有效的指标,而土地利用是最易受影响的指标。方差分析方法还显示,土地利用和植被密度(最终权重分别为 0.572 和 0.312)是选址中最重要的指标。加权线性组合法和 CPORAS 法的结果表明,第 6 区及其各区由于水土流失较少、降雨量较高、土壤条件较好以及有荒地,更适合发展绿地。因此,这些方法提出的方案可以更有把握地被选作创建绿地的适当地点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analysis of urban and peripheral green spaces using DEMATEL & COPRAS methods (West of Karaj city)

Analysis of urban and peripheral green spaces using DEMATEL & COPRAS methods (West of Karaj city)

Considering the important role and beneficial effects of green spaces in maintaining the ecological balance of the cities, determining the best location is one of the fundamental issues, which is the main goal of this study. In this study, ecological and socio-economic criteria were identified based on experts’ opinions and Delphi method and quantified using fuzzy methods. Several multi-criteria evaluation methods, including the analytic network process, DEMATEL technique, weighted linear combination and COPRAS method, were then used to evaluate the development of green space.

The results of the DEMATEL technique showed that the land use indicator has the highest interaction, and the distance from the police station has the least interaction with other indicators. In addition, altitude was the most effective indicator, and land use was the most impressionable indicator. The ANP method also revealed that land use and vegetation density with a final weight equal to 0.572 and 0.312 were the most important indicator in site selection. The results of weighted linear combination and CPORAS methods indicated that zone 6 and its districts, due to lower erosion, higher rainfall, better soil conditions, and wasteland is a more suitable location for green space development.

In general, the results showed that the methods used in this study, due to high flexibility and accuracy in presenting the results, can be a good alternative for other weighting, locating and ranking methods. Hence, the proposed options by these methods can be selected with higher certainty as a proper location for creating green space.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
806
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made. The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信