眼内手术后的眼内炎发生率和治疗类型。

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Brian L VanderBeek, Yineng Chen, Maurizio Tomaiuolo, Jordan D Deaner, Zeba A Syed, Binod Acharya, Qiang Zhang, Joel S Schuman, Leslie Hyman
{"title":"眼内手术后的眼内炎发生率和治疗类型。","authors":"Brian L VanderBeek, Yineng Chen, Maurizio Tomaiuolo, Jordan D Deaner, Zeba A Syed, Binod Acharya, Qiang Zhang, Joel S Schuman, Leslie Hyman","doi":"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Long-term trend analyses of overall endophthalmitis rates and treatment patterns are scarce. It is also unknown if the deviation from the recommendations of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study toward decreased utilization of vitrectomy is associated with different vision outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether the rate of endophthalmitis after intraocular procedures or the primary treatment (prompt vitrectomy vs tap and inject) for endophthalmitis has changed over the past 20 years.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study examined data for cohorts created by querying for different intraocular procedures, including intravitreal injections and surgeries for cataract removal, glaucoma, retinal conditions, and corneal transplants from 2000 to 2022. The data source was a US administrative medical claims database comprising commercial and Medicare Advantage insurance plans. Any intraocular procedure with at least 6 months of data available before and 6 weeks after the procedure was eligible. Exclusion criteria consisted of any previous diagnosis of endophthalmitis or another intraocular procedure during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The main outcomes were rate of postprocedure endophthalmitis and relative rate of prompt vitrectomy (vs tap and inject) as the primary method of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2 124 964 patients, the mean (SD) age was 71.4 (10.2) years; 1 230 320 were female and 894 414 male. Over 22 years, 5 827 809 intraocular procedures were analyzed with 4305 cases of endophthalmitis found for an overall endophthalmitis rate of 0.07%. The yearly rate of endophthalmitis varied but generally declined from a high of 7 cases per 3502 procedures (0.20%) in 2000 to a low of 163 cases per 332 159 procedures (0.05%) in 2022. The percentage of cases treated with prompt vitrectomy also varied but generally declined over time with a high of 17 of 35 (48.6%) in 2003 and a low of 60 of 515 (11.6%) in 2021. Multivariable analysis of the endophthalmitis incidence rate ratio (IRR) showed a per-year decrease of 2.7% (IRR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.97-0.98; P < .001) over the study period. A similar analysis also showed that the incidence rate of prompt surgical treatment decreased by 3.8% per year throughout the study period (IRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.97; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that the incidence of endophthalmitis following intraocular procedures appears to have decreased substantially over the past 20 years while prompt vitrectomy is being used less frequently as primary treatment than in the past.</p>","PeriodicalId":14518,"journal":{"name":"JAMA ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"827-834"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endophthalmitis Rates and Types of Treatments After Intraocular Procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Brian L VanderBeek, Yineng Chen, Maurizio Tomaiuolo, Jordan D Deaner, Zeba A Syed, Binod Acharya, Qiang Zhang, Joel S Schuman, Leslie Hyman\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Long-term trend analyses of overall endophthalmitis rates and treatment patterns are scarce. It is also unknown if the deviation from the recommendations of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study toward decreased utilization of vitrectomy is associated with different vision outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether the rate of endophthalmitis after intraocular procedures or the primary treatment (prompt vitrectomy vs tap and inject) for endophthalmitis has changed over the past 20 years.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study examined data for cohorts created by querying for different intraocular procedures, including intravitreal injections and surgeries for cataract removal, glaucoma, retinal conditions, and corneal transplants from 2000 to 2022. The data source was a US administrative medical claims database comprising commercial and Medicare Advantage insurance plans. Any intraocular procedure with at least 6 months of data available before and 6 weeks after the procedure was eligible. Exclusion criteria consisted of any previous diagnosis of endophthalmitis or another intraocular procedure during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The main outcomes were rate of postprocedure endophthalmitis and relative rate of prompt vitrectomy (vs tap and inject) as the primary method of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2 124 964 patients, the mean (SD) age was 71.4 (10.2) years; 1 230 320 were female and 894 414 male. Over 22 years, 5 827 809 intraocular procedures were analyzed with 4305 cases of endophthalmitis found for an overall endophthalmitis rate of 0.07%. The yearly rate of endophthalmitis varied but generally declined from a high of 7 cases per 3502 procedures (0.20%) in 2000 to a low of 163 cases per 332 159 procedures (0.05%) in 2022. The percentage of cases treated with prompt vitrectomy also varied but generally declined over time with a high of 17 of 35 (48.6%) in 2003 and a low of 60 of 515 (11.6%) in 2021. Multivariable analysis of the endophthalmitis incidence rate ratio (IRR) showed a per-year decrease of 2.7% (IRR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.97-0.98; P < .001) over the study period. A similar analysis also showed that the incidence rate of prompt surgical treatment decreased by 3.8% per year throughout the study period (IRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.97; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that the incidence of endophthalmitis following intraocular procedures appears to have decreased substantially over the past 20 years while prompt vitrectomy is being used less frequently as primary treatment than in the past.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"827-834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295066/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2749\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:眼底病总体发病率和治疗模式的长期趋势分析很少。此外,眼底病玻璃体切割术研究建议减少使用玻璃体切割术是否与不同的视力结果有关也是未知数:目的:确定眼内手术后的眼内炎发生率或眼内炎的主要治疗方法(及时进行玻璃体切割术与点滴注射)在过去 20 年中是否发生了变化:这项队列研究检查了 2000 年至 2022 年期间通过查询不同眼内手术(包括玻璃体内注射和白内障摘除手术、青光眼、视网膜病变和角膜移植手术)而创建的队列数据。数据来源是美国行政医疗索赔数据库,包括商业保险和医疗保险优势计划。任何眼内手术,只要在手术前至少 6 个月和手术后至少 6 周内有数据可查,均符合条件。排除标准包括曾被诊断为眼内炎或在随访期间接受过其他眼内手术。主要结果测量指标:主要结果是手术后眼内炎的发生率和作为主要治疗方法的及时玻璃体切除术(与敲击和注射相比)的相对发生率:在 2 124 964 名患者中,平均(标清)年龄为 71.4(10.2)岁;女性 1 230 320 人,男性 894 414 人。22 年间,共分析了 5 827 809 例眼球内手术,发现 4305 例眼底病,眼底病总发生率为 0.07%。眼内炎的年发病率各不相同,但总体呈下降趋势,最高为 2000 年的每 3502 例手术中 7 例(0.20%),最低为 2022 年的每 332 159 例手术中 163 例(0.05%)。及时进行玻璃体切除术的病例比例也各不相同,但总体上随时间推移而下降,最高为 2003 年的 35 例中的 17 例(48.6%),最低为 2021 年的 515 例中的 60 例(11.6%)。眼底病发病率比值(IRR)的多变量分析表明,眼底病发病率每年下降 2.7%(IRR,0.97;95% CI,0.97-0.98;P 结论及意义:本研究发现,在过去 20 年中,眼内手术后眼内炎的发病率似乎大幅下降,而及时玻璃体切割术作为主要治疗方法的使用频率却比过去有所降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endophthalmitis Rates and Types of Treatments After Intraocular Procedures.

Importance: Long-term trend analyses of overall endophthalmitis rates and treatment patterns are scarce. It is also unknown if the deviation from the recommendations of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study toward decreased utilization of vitrectomy is associated with different vision outcomes.

Objective: To determine whether the rate of endophthalmitis after intraocular procedures or the primary treatment (prompt vitrectomy vs tap and inject) for endophthalmitis has changed over the past 20 years.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study examined data for cohorts created by querying for different intraocular procedures, including intravitreal injections and surgeries for cataract removal, glaucoma, retinal conditions, and corneal transplants from 2000 to 2022. The data source was a US administrative medical claims database comprising commercial and Medicare Advantage insurance plans. Any intraocular procedure with at least 6 months of data available before and 6 weeks after the procedure was eligible. Exclusion criteria consisted of any previous diagnosis of endophthalmitis or another intraocular procedure during the follow-up period.

Main outcome measure: The main outcomes were rate of postprocedure endophthalmitis and relative rate of prompt vitrectomy (vs tap and inject) as the primary method of treatment.

Results: Among 2 124 964 patients, the mean (SD) age was 71.4 (10.2) years; 1 230 320 were female and 894 414 male. Over 22 years, 5 827 809 intraocular procedures were analyzed with 4305 cases of endophthalmitis found for an overall endophthalmitis rate of 0.07%. The yearly rate of endophthalmitis varied but generally declined from a high of 7 cases per 3502 procedures (0.20%) in 2000 to a low of 163 cases per 332 159 procedures (0.05%) in 2022. The percentage of cases treated with prompt vitrectomy also varied but generally declined over time with a high of 17 of 35 (48.6%) in 2003 and a low of 60 of 515 (11.6%) in 2021. Multivariable analysis of the endophthalmitis incidence rate ratio (IRR) showed a per-year decrease of 2.7% (IRR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.97-0.98; P < .001) over the study period. A similar analysis also showed that the incidence rate of prompt surgical treatment decreased by 3.8% per year throughout the study period (IRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.97; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that the incidence of endophthalmitis following intraocular procedures appears to have decreased substantially over the past 20 years while prompt vitrectomy is being used less frequently as primary treatment than in the past.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA ophthalmology
JAMA ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
340
期刊介绍: JAMA Ophthalmology, with a rich history of continuous publication since 1869, stands as a distinguished international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to ophthalmology and visual science. In 2019, the journal proudly commemorated 150 years of uninterrupted service to the field. As a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, a consortium renowned for its peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Ophthalmology upholds the highest standards of excellence in disseminating cutting-edge research and insights. Join us in celebrating our legacy and advancing the frontiers of ophthalmology and visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信