儿科肿瘤专家对 CAR-T 疗法转诊的看法:一项混合方法试点研究。

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Anurekha G Hall, Devan M Duenas, Jenna Voutsinas, Qian Wu, Adam J Lamble, Elizabeth Gruber, Benjamin Wilfond, Julie R Park, Anurag K Agrawal, Jonathan M Marron
{"title":"儿科肿瘤专家对 CAR-T 疗法转诊的看法:一项混合方法试点研究。","authors":"Anurekha G Hall, Devan M Duenas, Jenna Voutsinas, Qian Wu, Adam J Lamble, Elizabeth Gruber, Benjamin Wilfond, Julie R Park, Anurag K Agrawal, Jonathan M Marron","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Receipt of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy at an institution different from the primary oncologist's institution is a complex, multistep process. Referral by oncologists plays an important role in the process but may be susceptible to bias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Oncologists who previously referred patients for CAR-T therapy at 5 pediatric hospitals were sent surveys by email exploring their CAR-T referral practices. Descriptive statistics were generated, and multivariate analyses examined associations among oncologist characteristics, familiarity with CAR-T therapy, and referral practices. We conducted semistructured interviews with a subset of participants and used thematic analysis to code transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight oncologists completed the survey; 77% expressed being \"very familiar\" with CAR-T therapy. Hispanic oncologists and oncologists at institutions with 50 or fewer new diagnoses per year were more likely to identify as less familiar with CAR-T therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 64.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.45 to 10 452.50, P = .04 and OR = 24.5, 95% CI = 3.3 to 317.3, P = .005, respectively). In total, 38% of respondents considered nonclinical features (compliance, social support, resources, insurance, language, education, and race or ethnicity) influential in referral decisions. Oncologists who were Hispanic and oncologists who had been practicing for 20 or more years were more likely to consider these features significantly influential (OR = 14.52, 95% CI = 1.49 to 358.66, P = .04 and OR = 6.76, 95% CI = 1.18 to 50.5, P = .04). Nine oncologists completed in-depth interviews; common themes included barriers and concerns regarding CAR-T therapy referral, the value of an established relationship with a CAR-T therapy center, and poor communication after CAR-T therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nearly 40% of oncologists consider nonclinical features significantly influential when deciding to refer patients for CAR-T therapy, raising concern for bias in the referral process. Establishing formal partnerships with CAR-T therapy centers may help address physician barriers in referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of pediatric oncologists on referral for CAR-T therapy: a mixed methods pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Anurekha G Hall, Devan M Duenas, Jenna Voutsinas, Qian Wu, Adam J Lamble, Elizabeth Gruber, Benjamin Wilfond, Julie R Park, Anurag K Agrawal, Jonathan M Marron\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncics/pkae063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Receipt of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy at an institution different from the primary oncologist's institution is a complex, multistep process. Referral by oncologists plays an important role in the process but may be susceptible to bias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Oncologists who previously referred patients for CAR-T therapy at 5 pediatric hospitals were sent surveys by email exploring their CAR-T referral practices. Descriptive statistics were generated, and multivariate analyses examined associations among oncologist characteristics, familiarity with CAR-T therapy, and referral practices. We conducted semistructured interviews with a subset of participants and used thematic analysis to code transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight oncologists completed the survey; 77% expressed being \\\"very familiar\\\" with CAR-T therapy. Hispanic oncologists and oncologists at institutions with 50 or fewer new diagnoses per year were more likely to identify as less familiar with CAR-T therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 64.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.45 to 10 452.50, P = .04 and OR = 24.5, 95% CI = 3.3 to 317.3, P = .005, respectively). In total, 38% of respondents considered nonclinical features (compliance, social support, resources, insurance, language, education, and race or ethnicity) influential in referral decisions. Oncologists who were Hispanic and oncologists who had been practicing for 20 or more years were more likely to consider these features significantly influential (OR = 14.52, 95% CI = 1.49 to 358.66, P = .04 and OR = 6.76, 95% CI = 1.18 to 50.5, P = .04). Nine oncologists completed in-depth interviews; common themes included barriers and concerns regarding CAR-T therapy referral, the value of an established relationship with a CAR-T therapy center, and poor communication after CAR-T therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nearly 40% of oncologists consider nonclinical features significantly influential when deciding to refer patients for CAR-T therapy, raising concern for bias in the referral process. Establishing formal partnerships with CAR-T therapy centers may help address physician barriers in referral.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340642/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在不同机构接受 CAR-T 治疗是一个复杂、多步骤的过程:在不同机构接受 CAR-T 治疗是一个复杂、多步骤的过程;肿瘤学家的转诊在这一过程中起着重要作用,但可能容易出现偏差:通过电子邮件向曾为五家儿科医院的 CAR-T 患者转诊的肿瘤学家发送调查问卷,探讨他们的 CAR-T 转诊做法。我们进行了描述性统计,并通过多变量分析研究了肿瘤学家的特征、对 CAR-T 的熟悉程度和转诊实践之间的关联。我们对部分参与者进行了半结构化访谈,并使用主题分析法对记录誊本进行编码:68名肿瘤学家完成了调查,其中77%(n = 44)的人表示 "非常熟悉 "CAR-T。西班牙裔肿瘤学家和每年新诊断病例少于 50 例的机构的肿瘤学家更有可能认为自己对 CAR-T 不太熟悉(OR 64.3 (CI:2.45-10452.5),p = 0.04 和 OR 24.5 (CI:3.3-317.3),p = 0.005)。38%的人认为非临床特征(依从性、社会支持、资源、保险、语言、教育、种族或民族)对转诊决定有影响。西班牙裔肿瘤学家和从业 20 年以上的肿瘤学家更有可能认为这些特征具有重大影响(OR 14.52 (CI:1.49-358.66),p = 0.04 和 OR 6.76 (CI:1.18-50.5),p = 0.04)。九名肿瘤学家完成了深度访谈;共同主题包括 CAR-T 转诊的障碍和顾虑、与 CAR-T 中心建立关系的价值以及 CAR-T 后沟通不畅:近 40% 的肿瘤学家认为,在决定是否将患者转诊接受 CAR-T 治疗时,非临床特征会产生重大影响,这引起了人们对转诊过程中存在偏见的担忧。与CAR-T中心建立正式的合作关系可能有助于解决医生在转诊过程中遇到的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives of pediatric oncologists on referral for CAR-T therapy: a mixed methods pilot study.

Background: Receipt of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy at an institution different from the primary oncologist's institution is a complex, multistep process. Referral by oncologists plays an important role in the process but may be susceptible to bias.

Methods: Oncologists who previously referred patients for CAR-T therapy at 5 pediatric hospitals were sent surveys by email exploring their CAR-T referral practices. Descriptive statistics were generated, and multivariate analyses examined associations among oncologist characteristics, familiarity with CAR-T therapy, and referral practices. We conducted semistructured interviews with a subset of participants and used thematic analysis to code transcripts.

Results: Sixty-eight oncologists completed the survey; 77% expressed being "very familiar" with CAR-T therapy. Hispanic oncologists and oncologists at institutions with 50 or fewer new diagnoses per year were more likely to identify as less familiar with CAR-T therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 64.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.45 to 10 452.50, P = .04 and OR = 24.5, 95% CI = 3.3 to 317.3, P = .005, respectively). In total, 38% of respondents considered nonclinical features (compliance, social support, resources, insurance, language, education, and race or ethnicity) influential in referral decisions. Oncologists who were Hispanic and oncologists who had been practicing for 20 or more years were more likely to consider these features significantly influential (OR = 14.52, 95% CI = 1.49 to 358.66, P = .04 and OR = 6.76, 95% CI = 1.18 to 50.5, P = .04). Nine oncologists completed in-depth interviews; common themes included barriers and concerns regarding CAR-T therapy referral, the value of an established relationship with a CAR-T therapy center, and poor communication after CAR-T therapy.

Conclusions: Nearly 40% of oncologists consider nonclinical features significantly influential when deciding to refer patients for CAR-T therapy, raising concern for bias in the referral process. Establishing formal partnerships with CAR-T therapy centers may help address physician barriers in referral.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信