印度尼西亚患者健康问卷在精神病门诊患者中的临床实用性:根据 ICD-11 标准排除病症

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"印度尼西亚患者健康问卷在精神病门诊患者中的临床实用性:根据 ICD-11 标准排除病症","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) for identifying common mental disorders in an outpatient clinical psychologist office setting in Indonesia. A total of 661 outpatients from a clinical psychology office in Jakarta, Indonesia, participated in the study. The complete PHQ was administered, and its results were compared with diagnoses made by clinical psychologists based on ICD-11 criteria, including somatoform disorder (n = 6), depression (n = 117), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD, n = 50), panic disorder (n = 42), bulimia nervosa (n = 2), binge eating disorder (n = 2), and other diagnoses such as OCD and BPD (n = 442). Receiver operating characteristics were computed to examine cut-off points, and optimal cut-off points based on the Youden Index were identified for somatoform disorder (PHQ-15 ≥ 13), depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 13), GAD (GAD- 7 ≥ 10), and panic disorder (PHQ-PD ≥ 7). Cut-off points for the alcohol abuse and eating disorder modules of the PHQ could not be determined due to a lack of sample, and AUC was suboptimal for PHQ-9, GAD-7, and PHQ-ED. The Indonesian PHQ demonstrated good sensitivity but low specificity in identifying somatoform disorder, depression, GAD, and panic disorders based on ICD-11 criteria among Indonesian clinical psychologist office outpatients. In the Indonesian outpatient psychiatric context, the utility of the Indonesian PHQ appeared to be most effective in ruling out diagnoses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indonesian patient health questionnaire's clinical utility in psychiatric outpatients: Ruling out conditions per ICD-11 criteria\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) for identifying common mental disorders in an outpatient clinical psychologist office setting in Indonesia. A total of 661 outpatients from a clinical psychology office in Jakarta, Indonesia, participated in the study. The complete PHQ was administered, and its results were compared with diagnoses made by clinical psychologists based on ICD-11 criteria, including somatoform disorder (n = 6), depression (n = 117), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD, n = 50), panic disorder (n = 42), bulimia nervosa (n = 2), binge eating disorder (n = 2), and other diagnoses such as OCD and BPD (n = 442). Receiver operating characteristics were computed to examine cut-off points, and optimal cut-off points based on the Youden Index were identified for somatoform disorder (PHQ-15 ≥ 13), depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 13), GAD (GAD- 7 ≥ 10), and panic disorder (PHQ-PD ≥ 7). Cut-off points for the alcohol abuse and eating disorder modules of the PHQ could not be determined due to a lack of sample, and AUC was suboptimal for PHQ-9, GAD-7, and PHQ-ED. The Indonesian PHQ demonstrated good sensitivity but low specificity in identifying somatoform disorder, depression, GAD, and panic disorders based on ICD-11 criteria among Indonesian clinical psychologist office outpatients. In the Indonesian outpatient psychiatric context, the utility of the Indonesian PHQ appeared to be most effective in ruling out diagnoses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201824002776\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201824002776","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估患者健康问卷(Patient Health Questionnaire,PHQ)在印度尼西亚临床心理学家门诊中识别常见精神障碍的诊断准确性。共有 661 名来自印度尼西亚雅加达一家临床心理办公室的门诊患者参与了这项研究。研究人员使用了完整的 PHQ,并将其结果与临床心理学家根据 ICD-11 标准做出的诊断进行了比较,包括躯体形式障碍(n = 6)、抑郁症(n = 117)、广泛性焦虑症(GAD,n = 50)、恐慌症(n = 42)、神经性贪食症(n = 2)、暴饮暴食症(n = 2)以及其他诊断,如强迫症和 BPD(n = 442)。通过计算接收器工作特征来检查截断点,并根据尤登指数确定了躯体形式障碍(PHQ-15 ≥ 13)、抑郁症(PHQ-9 ≥ 13)、GAD(GAD- 7 ≥ 10)和惊恐障碍(PHQ-PD ≥ 7)的最佳截断点。由于缺乏样本,无法确定PHQ中酗酒和饮食失调模块的临界点,PHQ-9、GAD-7和PHQ-ED的AUC不理想。印尼 PHQ 在根据 ICD-11 标准识别印尼临床心理医生门诊患者的躯体形式障碍、抑郁症、GAD 和惊恐障碍方面表现出良好的灵敏度,但特异性较低。在印尼精神科门诊病人中,印尼 PHQ 在排除诊断方面似乎最为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indonesian patient health questionnaire's clinical utility in psychiatric outpatients: Ruling out conditions per ICD-11 criteria

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) for identifying common mental disorders in an outpatient clinical psychologist office setting in Indonesia. A total of 661 outpatients from a clinical psychology office in Jakarta, Indonesia, participated in the study. The complete PHQ was administered, and its results were compared with diagnoses made by clinical psychologists based on ICD-11 criteria, including somatoform disorder (n = 6), depression (n = 117), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD, n = 50), panic disorder (n = 42), bulimia nervosa (n = 2), binge eating disorder (n = 2), and other diagnoses such as OCD and BPD (n = 442). Receiver operating characteristics were computed to examine cut-off points, and optimal cut-off points based on the Youden Index were identified for somatoform disorder (PHQ-15 ≥ 13), depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 13), GAD (GAD- 7 ≥ 10), and panic disorder (PHQ-PD ≥ 7). Cut-off points for the alcohol abuse and eating disorder modules of the PHQ could not be determined due to a lack of sample, and AUC was suboptimal for PHQ-9, GAD-7, and PHQ-ED. The Indonesian PHQ demonstrated good sensitivity but low specificity in identifying somatoform disorder, depression, GAD, and panic disorders based on ICD-11 criteria among Indonesian clinical psychologist office outpatients. In the Indonesian outpatient psychiatric context, the utility of the Indonesian PHQ appeared to be most effective in ruling out diagnoses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信