{"title":"兼并中的平衡:法院对 C-376/20 P 委员会诉 CK 电信案的判决","authors":"Dr Daniele Calisti","doi":"10.1093/jeclap/lpae040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The judgment of the Court of Justice in CK telecoms is a seminal decision by which the Court reaffirmed and developed its earlier case-law on mergers under a new systematic framework, whose cornerstone is balance: the balance set by the Merger Regulation establishing a principle of neutrality between compatibility and incompatibility of any concentration with the internal market; the balance of probabilities that informs the standard of proof; the balance between the burden carried by the enforcer and that of the notifying parties on efficiencies; and the institutional balance between the Commission appraising concentrations and EU Courts carrying out judicial review.","PeriodicalId":207714,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","volume":" 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of balance in mergers: the judgment of the Court of Justice in case C-376/20 P Commission v CK telecoms\",\"authors\":\"Dr Daniele Calisti\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jeclap/lpae040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The judgment of the Court of Justice in CK telecoms is a seminal decision by which the Court reaffirmed and developed its earlier case-law on mergers under a new systematic framework, whose cornerstone is balance: the balance set by the Merger Regulation establishing a principle of neutrality between compatibility and incompatibility of any concentration with the internal market; the balance of probabilities that informs the standard of proof; the balance between the burden carried by the enforcer and that of the notifying parties on efficiencies; and the institutional balance between the Commission appraising concentrations and EU Courts carrying out judicial review.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice\",\"volume\":\" 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpae040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpae040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
法院在 CK Telecoms 案中的判决是一项开创性的裁决,法院通过该判决在新的系统框架 下重申并发展了其先前关于兼并的判例法,该框架的基石是平衡:兼并条例》设定的平衡,该条例在任何集中与内部市场的兼容性和不兼容性之间确立了中立原则;作为举证标准依据的可能性平衡;执行者与通知方在效率方面的责任平衡;以及欧盟委员会评估集中与欧盟法院进行司法审查之间的机构平衡。
Of balance in mergers: the judgment of the Court of Justice in case C-376/20 P Commission v CK telecoms
The judgment of the Court of Justice in CK telecoms is a seminal decision by which the Court reaffirmed and developed its earlier case-law on mergers under a new systematic framework, whose cornerstone is balance: the balance set by the Merger Regulation establishing a principle of neutrality between compatibility and incompatibility of any concentration with the internal market; the balance of probabilities that informs the standard of proof; the balance between the burden carried by the enforcer and that of the notifying parties on efficiencies; and the institutional balance between the Commission appraising concentrations and EU Courts carrying out judicial review.