宣传团体、政策补贴和政策变革：教师评价案例

IF 4.1 2区管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Policy Studies Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1111/psj.12538

Leslie K. Finger

{"title":"宣传团体、政策补贴和政策变革：教师评价案例","authors":"Leslie K. Finger","doi":"10.1111/psj.12538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How are powerful interest groups with a stake in the status quo overcome? Policymakers succeed in enacting policies against the preferences of powerful vested interests when they delegate the costs associated with challenging those vested interests to advocacy groups. Advocacy groups can provide information and capacity, freeing allied policymakers from relying on vested interests. Using a 50‐state regression analysis of teacher evaluation policymaking in 2010 and 2011 and case studies of the experiences of Minnesota and Wisconsin, I find evidence that where advocacy groups assist policymaker allies, they can successfully pass and implement policy change against the preferences of powerful vested interests.","PeriodicalId":48154,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advocacy groups, policy subsidies, and policy change: The case of teacher evaluations\",\"authors\":\"Leslie K. Finger\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psj.12538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How are powerful interest groups with a stake in the status quo overcome? Policymakers succeed in enacting policies against the preferences of powerful vested interests when they delegate the costs associated with challenging those vested interests to advocacy groups. Advocacy groups can provide information and capacity, freeing allied policymakers from relying on vested interests. Using a 50‐state regression analysis of teacher evaluation policymaking in 2010 and 2011 and case studies of the experiences of Minnesota and Wisconsin, I find evidence that where advocacy groups assist policymaker allies, they can successfully pass and implement policy change against the preferences of powerful vested interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy Studies Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12538\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

如何克服与现状利益攸关的强大利益集团？当政策制定者将挑战既得利益集团的相关成本委托给倡导团体时，他们就能成功地制定出与强大的既得利益集团的偏好相悖的政策。倡导团体可以提供信息和能力，使结盟的政策制定者不再依赖既得利益。通过对 2010 年和 2011 年 50 个州的教师评价政策制定情况进行回归分析，以及对明尼苏达州和威斯康星州的经验进行案例研究，我发现有证据表明，在倡导团体协助政策制定者盟友的情况下，他们可以成功地通过并实施政策变革，从而与强大的既得利益集团的偏好背道而驰。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Advocacy groups, policy subsidies, and policy change: The case of teacher evaluations

How are powerful interest groups with a stake in the status quo overcome? Policymakers succeed in enacting policies against the preferences of powerful vested interests when they delegate the costs associated with challenging those vested interests to advocacy groups. Advocacy groups can provide information and capacity, freeing allied policymakers from relying on vested interests. Using a 50‐state regression analysis of teacher evaluation policymaking in 2010 and 2011 and case studies of the experiences of Minnesota and Wisconsin, I find evidence that where advocacy groups assist policymaker allies, they can successfully pass and implement policy change against the preferences of powerful vested interests.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Policy Studies Journal Multiple-

CiteScore

11.60

自引率

10.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： As the principal outlet for the Public Policy Section of the American Political Science Association and for the Policy Studies Organization (PSO), the Policy Studies Journal (PSJ) is the premier channel for the publication of public policy research. PSJ is best characterized as an outlet for theoretically and empirically grounded research on policy process and policy analysis. More specifically, we aim to publish articles that advance public policy theory, explicitly articulate its methods of data collection and analysis, and provide clear descriptions of how their work advances the literature.