准同时到达(QSA)计算不足的 SIMS 数据校正程序及误用的后果

IF 2.7 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Clive Jones, David A. Fike
{"title":"准同时到达(QSA)计算不足的 SIMS 数据校正程序及误用的后果","authors":"Clive Jones,&nbsp;David A. Fike","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Isotope geochemistry requires isotope ratios measured using secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) to be made with optimal precision and accuracy. Under some analytical conditions when using electron multiplier detectors, secondary ions may be under-counted because of quasi-simultaneous arrival (QSA) at the first dynode. The relative magnitude of the associated QSA correction to raw measured isotopic ratios can be up to seventy permil or more. Therefore, not applying the correction, or misapplication of it could lead to significant inaccuracies in published isotope ratio data. Examples and ramifications of the latter are described in addition to a straightforward procedure for QSA under-counting correction.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"48 3","pages":"613-618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SIMS Data Correction Procedure for Quasi-Simultaneous Arrival (QSA) Under-counting and Ramifications of Misapplication\",\"authors\":\"Clive Jones,&nbsp;David A. Fike\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggr.12570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Isotope geochemistry requires isotope ratios measured using secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) to be made with optimal precision and accuracy. Under some analytical conditions when using electron multiplier detectors, secondary ions may be under-counted because of quasi-simultaneous arrival (QSA) at the first dynode. The relative magnitude of the associated QSA correction to raw measured isotopic ratios can be up to seventy permil or more. Therefore, not applying the correction, or misapplication of it could lead to significant inaccuracies in published isotope ratio data. Examples and ramifications of the latter are described in addition to a straightforward procedure for QSA under-counting correction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"613-618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12570\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同位素地球化学要求使用二次离子质谱法(SIMS)测量的同位素比值具有最佳精度和准确性。在某些分析条件下,当使用电子倍增探测器时,由于准同时到达(QSA)第一个 dynode,二次离子可能会计算不足。相关的 QSA 校正对原始测量同位素比值的相对影响可高达 70 permil 或更多。因此,不应用校正或误用校正会导致已公布的同位素比值数据严重不准确。本文介绍了后者的示例和影响,以及 QSA 计算不足校正的直接程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SIMS Data Correction Procedure for Quasi-Simultaneous Arrival (QSA) Under-counting and Ramifications of Misapplication

Isotope geochemistry requires isotope ratios measured using secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) to be made with optimal precision and accuracy. Under some analytical conditions when using electron multiplier detectors, secondary ions may be under-counted because of quasi-simultaneous arrival (QSA) at the first dynode. The relative magnitude of the associated QSA correction to raw measured isotopic ratios can be up to seventy permil or more. Therefore, not applying the correction, or misapplication of it could lead to significant inaccuracies in published isotope ratio data. Examples and ramifications of the latter are described in addition to a straightforward procedure for QSA under-counting correction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信