M. Bîrsan, A. Cristofor, Cristina Tuchiluș, F. Crivoi, R. Vlad, Cezara Pintea, P. Antonoaea, A. Ciurba
{"title":"开发适合个性化化妆品的膏霜基","authors":"M. Bîrsan, A. Cristofor, Cristina Tuchiluș, F. Crivoi, R. Vlad, Cezara Pintea, P. Antonoaea, A. Ciurba","doi":"10.15386/mpr-2765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims. The individualization of cosmetic products or personalized dermatology preparations are in great demand at the present time. \nMethods. 24 emulsifying cream bases were proposed which were prepared by the classical, automatic and semi-automatic methods, respectively, and the physical stability resulted from the three types of homogenization was taken into account. Texture parameters were also studied for the most stable cream bases in the preformulation stage and the t - statistical test was applied. In order to choose the most optimal preservative, the effectiveness of the NipaEster solution 0.1%, Cosgard and Euxyl® PE 9010 was tested on the strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans. \nResults. 9 cream bases were stable through all the preparation methods used, and preservation was achieved with Euxyl® PE 9010. Following the texture parameters, significant differences were observed for the same formula in the case of choosing a different preparation method. \nConclusions. Formulas F1, with methyl glucose sesquistearate as emulsifier, F8, with cetearyl glucosite as emulsifier, and F14, with Ceteareth-20 can be used as cream bases for customized products.","PeriodicalId":18438,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of cream bases suitable for personalized cosmetic products\",\"authors\":\"M. Bîrsan, A. Cristofor, Cristina Tuchiluș, F. Crivoi, R. Vlad, Cezara Pintea, P. Antonoaea, A. Ciurba\",\"doi\":\"10.15386/mpr-2765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and aims. The individualization of cosmetic products or personalized dermatology preparations are in great demand at the present time. \\nMethods. 24 emulsifying cream bases were proposed which were prepared by the classical, automatic and semi-automatic methods, respectively, and the physical stability resulted from the three types of homogenization was taken into account. Texture parameters were also studied for the most stable cream bases in the preformulation stage and the t - statistical test was applied. In order to choose the most optimal preservative, the effectiveness of the NipaEster solution 0.1%, Cosgard and Euxyl® PE 9010 was tested on the strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans. \\nResults. 9 cream bases were stable through all the preparation methods used, and preservation was achieved with Euxyl® PE 9010. Following the texture parameters, significant differences were observed for the same formula in the case of choosing a different preparation method. \\nConclusions. Formulas F1, with methyl glucose sesquistearate as emulsifier, F8, with cetearyl glucosite as emulsifier, and F14, with Ceteareth-20 can be used as cream bases for customized products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的。目前,个性化美容产品或个性化皮肤科制剂的需求量很大。研究方法提出了 24 种乳化膏基,分别采用传统、自动和半自动方法制备,并考虑了三种均质化方式所产生的物理稳定性。此外,还对预配制阶段最稳定的乳脂基质的质地参数进行了研究,并采用了 t 统计检验。为了选择最理想的防腐剂,测试了 NipaEster 溶液 0.1%、Cosgard 和 Euxyl® PE 9010 对金黄色葡萄球菌、绿脓杆菌和白色念珠菌的功效。结果显示在所有使用的制备方法中,9 种膏霜基质都很稳定,而 Euxyl® PE 9010 则达到了防腐效果。根据质地参数,在选择不同配制方法的情况下,相同配方的质地有显著差异。结论以甲基葡萄糖倍半硬脂酸酯为乳化剂的配方 F1、以鲸蜡硬脂醇葡糖酸酯为乳化剂的配方 F8 和以鲸蜡硬脂醇聚醚-20 为乳化剂的配方 F14 可用作定制产品的膏霜基。
Development of cream bases suitable for personalized cosmetic products
Background and aims. The individualization of cosmetic products or personalized dermatology preparations are in great demand at the present time.
Methods. 24 emulsifying cream bases were proposed which were prepared by the classical, automatic and semi-automatic methods, respectively, and the physical stability resulted from the three types of homogenization was taken into account. Texture parameters were also studied for the most stable cream bases in the preformulation stage and the t - statistical test was applied. In order to choose the most optimal preservative, the effectiveness of the NipaEster solution 0.1%, Cosgard and Euxyl® PE 9010 was tested on the strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans.
Results. 9 cream bases were stable through all the preparation methods used, and preservation was achieved with Euxyl® PE 9010. Following the texture parameters, significant differences were observed for the same formula in the case of choosing a different preparation method.
Conclusions. Formulas F1, with methyl glucose sesquistearate as emulsifier, F8, with cetearyl glucosite as emulsifier, and F14, with Ceteareth-20 can be used as cream bases for customized products.