诉求与救济:揭示美国最高法院在1983条诉讼和黑人生命问题判例中的误解和失误

†. SimonaGrossi, IV. Linda, R. S. V. Richard, D. and
{"title":"诉求与救济:揭示美国最高法院在1983条诉讼和黑人生命问题判例中的误解和失误","authors":"†. SimonaGrossi, IV. Linda, R. S. V. Richard, D. and","doi":"10.52214/cjrl.v14i1.12890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the persistent challenges in addressing police brutality through civil rights litigation, focusing on the limitations imposed by federal jurisdiction and justiciability doctrines post-Lyons. It argues that the Supreme Court's approach, which conflates jurisdictional inquiries with procedural or remedial ones, has significantly hindered access to justice for plaintiffs seeking to vindicate their constitutional rights under §1983. By examining the foundational jurisdictional and procedural principles at stake, the article reveals the Court's missteps and suggests ways to disentangle these concepts, aiming to restore §1983's essential role in defending constitutional rights and ensuring that victims of police misconduct can obtain full redress in federal courts.","PeriodicalId":491341,"journal":{"name":"Columbia journal of race and law","volume":"55 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE CLAIM AND THE RELIEF: REVEALING MISCONCEPTIONS AND MISSTEPS IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S JURISPRUDENCE FOR §1983 ACTIONS AND BLACK LIVES MATTER\",\"authors\":\"†. SimonaGrossi, IV. Linda, R. S. V. Richard, D. and\",\"doi\":\"10.52214/cjrl.v14i1.12890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the persistent challenges in addressing police brutality through civil rights litigation, focusing on the limitations imposed by federal jurisdiction and justiciability doctrines post-Lyons. It argues that the Supreme Court's approach, which conflates jurisdictional inquiries with procedural or remedial ones, has significantly hindered access to justice for plaintiffs seeking to vindicate their constitutional rights under §1983. By examining the foundational jurisdictional and procedural principles at stake, the article reveals the Court's missteps and suggests ways to disentangle these concepts, aiming to restore §1983's essential role in defending constitutional rights and ensuring that victims of police misconduct can obtain full redress in federal courts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":491341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Columbia journal of race and law\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Columbia journal of race and law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52214/cjrl.v14i1.12890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia journal of race and law","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/cjrl.v14i1.12890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了通过民权诉讼解决警察施暴问题所面临的长期挑战,重点是《里昂案》之后联邦管辖权和可诉性理论所施加的限制。文章认为,最高法院将管辖权调查与程序性或补救性调查混为一谈的做法极大地阻碍了寻求根据1983条款维护其宪法权利的原告诉诸司法。文章通过研究事关重大的基础性司法管辖和程序原则,揭示了法院的失误,并提出了将这些概念分开的方法,旨在恢复1983条款在捍卫宪法权利方面的重要作用,确保警察不当行为的受害者能够在联邦法院获得充分补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE CLAIM AND THE RELIEF: REVEALING MISCONCEPTIONS AND MISSTEPS IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S JURISPRUDENCE FOR §1983 ACTIONS AND BLACK LIVES MATTER
This article explores the persistent challenges in addressing police brutality through civil rights litigation, focusing on the limitations imposed by federal jurisdiction and justiciability doctrines post-Lyons. It argues that the Supreme Court's approach, which conflates jurisdictional inquiries with procedural or remedial ones, has significantly hindered access to justice for plaintiffs seeking to vindicate their constitutional rights under §1983. By examining the foundational jurisdictional and procedural principles at stake, the article reveals the Court's missteps and suggests ways to disentangle these concepts, aiming to restore §1983's essential role in defending constitutional rights and ensuring that victims of police misconduct can obtain full redress in federal courts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信