Autheem 疗法对沙特幼儿的安全性如何?值得一问的问题

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
A. A. Bin Alamir, Alanoud M. AlShammari, M. M. Almutairi, H. Aldhafiri, Yossef Alnasser
{"title":"Autheem 疗法对沙特幼儿的安全性如何?值得一问的问题","authors":"A. A. Bin Alamir, Alanoud M. AlShammari, M. M. Almutairi, H. Aldhafiri, Yossef Alnasser","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1959_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n In Saudi Arabia, a traditional therapy for a folk labeled problem known as “Autheem – \n \n \n \n JOURNAL/jfmpc/04.03/01697686-202413080-00056/inline-graphic1/v/2024-07-26T044321Z/r/image-tiff\n \n \n \n ” is often offered to infants. The procedure involves manipulating an infant’s soft palate to alleviate pain associated with infant colic and poor feeding. However, concerns remain about this procedure’s impact on infant health and its potential to transmit infections. This study focused on perceptions that Saudi mothers hold about Autheem therapy.\n \n \n \n A descriptive, cross-sectional, community-based study was conducted via an online platform to reach Saudi mothers in the Riyadh region of Saudi Arabia.\n \n \n \n Five hundred and thirty-six Saudi mothers participated; half were older than 30 years of age. Despite a high rate of college degree attainment, the majority of mothers relied on their elders as a source of information (88.4%). Autheem was viewed to be a stand-alone disease by 86.5% of respondents; 71.4% believed it could not be treated with modern medicine. Most infants were under six months of age when they received Autheem therapy (72%). Roughly 13% of mothers found that their infant had a fever after the therapy; we found an association between Autheem therapy and viral illnesses. About 13% of mothers altered their child’s vaccination schedule after Autheem therapy.\n \n \n \n Older mothers have more positive attitudes towards and stronger beliefs in Autheem therapy than younger mothers. The therapy’s strong association with viral illnesses and its negative impact on vaccination schedules are major public health concerns.\n","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How safe is Autheem therapy for young Saudi infants? A question worth asking\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Bin Alamir, Alanoud M. AlShammari, M. M. Almutairi, H. Aldhafiri, Yossef Alnasser\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1959_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n \\n \\n \\n In Saudi Arabia, a traditional therapy for a folk labeled problem known as “Autheem – \\n \\n \\n \\n JOURNAL/jfmpc/04.03/01697686-202413080-00056/inline-graphic1/v/2024-07-26T044321Z/r/image-tiff\\n \\n \\n \\n ” is often offered to infants. The procedure involves manipulating an infant’s soft palate to alleviate pain associated with infant colic and poor feeding. However, concerns remain about this procedure’s impact on infant health and its potential to transmit infections. This study focused on perceptions that Saudi mothers hold about Autheem therapy.\\n \\n \\n \\n A descriptive, cross-sectional, community-based study was conducted via an online platform to reach Saudi mothers in the Riyadh region of Saudi Arabia.\\n \\n \\n \\n Five hundred and thirty-six Saudi mothers participated; half were older than 30 years of age. Despite a high rate of college degree attainment, the majority of mothers relied on their elders as a source of information (88.4%). Autheem was viewed to be a stand-alone disease by 86.5% of respondents; 71.4% believed it could not be treated with modern medicine. Most infants were under six months of age when they received Autheem therapy (72%). Roughly 13% of mothers found that their infant had a fever after the therapy; we found an association between Autheem therapy and viral illnesses. About 13% of mothers altered their child’s vaccination schedule after Autheem therapy.\\n \\n \\n \\n Older mothers have more positive attitudes towards and stronger beliefs in Autheem therapy than younger mothers. The therapy’s strong association with viral illnesses and its negative impact on vaccination schedules are major public health concerns.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":15856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1959_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1959_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 在沙特阿拉伯,一种被称为 "Autheem - JOURNAL/jfmpc/04.03/01697686-202413080-00056/inline-graphic1/v/2024-07-26T044321Z/r/image-tiff "的民间传统疗法经常用于婴儿。这种方法是通过操作婴儿的软腭来减轻与婴儿肠绞痛和喂养不良有关的疼痛。然而,人们仍然担心这种方法对婴儿健康的影响及其传播感染的可能性。本研究的重点是沙特母亲对 Autheem疗法的看法。 本研究通过在线平台对沙特阿拉伯利雅得地区的沙特籍母亲进行了一项描述性、横断面、基于社区的研究。 共有 536 名沙特籍母亲参与,其中一半年龄在 30 岁以上。尽管获得大学学位的比例很高,但大多数母亲还是依靠长辈作为信息来源(88.4%)。86.5%的受访者认为自闭症是一种独立的疾病;71.4%的受访者认为现代医学无法治疗自闭症。大多数婴儿在接受 Autheem 治疗时还不满六个月(72%)。约 13% 的母亲发现婴儿在接受治疗后发烧;我们发现 Autheem疗法与病毒性疾病有关。约 13% 的母亲在接受 Autheem 治疗后改变了孩子的疫苗接种计划。 与年轻母亲相比,年长母亲对 Autheem疗法的态度更积极,信念更坚定。该疗法与病毒性疾病的密切联系及其对疫苗接种计划的负面影响是公众健康的主要关注点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How safe is Autheem therapy for young Saudi infants? A question worth asking
ABSTRACT In Saudi Arabia, a traditional therapy for a folk labeled problem known as “Autheem – JOURNAL/jfmpc/04.03/01697686-202413080-00056/inline-graphic1/v/2024-07-26T044321Z/r/image-tiff ” is often offered to infants. The procedure involves manipulating an infant’s soft palate to alleviate pain associated with infant colic and poor feeding. However, concerns remain about this procedure’s impact on infant health and its potential to transmit infections. This study focused on perceptions that Saudi mothers hold about Autheem therapy. A descriptive, cross-sectional, community-based study was conducted via an online platform to reach Saudi mothers in the Riyadh region of Saudi Arabia. Five hundred and thirty-six Saudi mothers participated; half were older than 30 years of age. Despite a high rate of college degree attainment, the majority of mothers relied on their elders as a source of information (88.4%). Autheem was viewed to be a stand-alone disease by 86.5% of respondents; 71.4% believed it could not be treated with modern medicine. Most infants were under six months of age when they received Autheem therapy (72%). Roughly 13% of mothers found that their infant had a fever after the therapy; we found an association between Autheem therapy and viral illnesses. About 13% of mothers altered their child’s vaccination schedule after Autheem therapy. Older mothers have more positive attitudes towards and stronger beliefs in Autheem therapy than younger mothers. The therapy’s strong association with viral illnesses and its negative impact on vaccination schedules are major public health concerns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信