The party’s role on the management of Nabire nature tourism park in Kimi Bay District of Nabire Regency

This research study was to determine the parties, roles, interests and influence of the parties and the collaboration relationship of the parties in the management of Nab ire TWA in Kimi Bay District, Nab ire Regency. Based on the results of the study, it was known that there were 21 parties in the management of Nab ire TWA based on entities as government and community including BBKSDA Papua, KSDA Region II Nab ire Division, Head of Air Mandidi Village, Head of Kimi Bay District, Nab ire Regency Culture, Youth, Sports and Tourism Office, DLH, DPUPR, Nab ire Regency Education Office, BAPPEDA, Dispenda, BPN/ATR, USWIM, Customary Rights Owners, Traditional Leaders, Women Leaders, Youth Leaders, HIPETA NGOs, Tourist Attraction Owners, Visitors and Communities Around TWA. The role of the parties to the level of influence and importance based on grouping in the quadrant assessment, namely as a group of key players consisting of the Papua BBKSDA, Nab ire Region II KSDA Division and Customary Rights Owners. The context setter group, namely the Nab ire Regency Environment Office, the Nab ire Regency PUPR Office, the Head of Air Mandidi Village, the Head of Kimi Bay District, traditional leaders, youth leaders, leaders, women and community leaders. The subject group, namely the Nab ire Regency Culture, Youth, Sports and Tourism Office, Nab ire Regency Dispenda, USWIM, HIPETA NGO, Communities Around TWA and Tourist Attraction Owners. The crowd group, namely the Nab ire Regency Education Office, BPN / ATR and visitors. The highest value of the level of influence and importance in the management of TWA was 22 (twenty-two) by BBKSDA Papua and the Nab ire Region II KSDA Division as the controlling authority in the implementation and decision making of Nab ire TWA management. Furthermore, the lowest value of the level of influence and importance of 5 (five) was the visitors. The visitors benefit from TWA Nab ire. Although the level of importance and influence was low and not directly involved in management, visitors could be educated about the management of TWA which was different from other tourist attractions. Knowledge about the existence of conservation areas that still maintain the existence of surrounding natural resources. Cooperative relationships based on interaction, continuity, synergy, strength by key players had a value of 4.3 with the highest value. Furthermore, the subject group had a value of rights, responsibilities and benefits of 3, the context setter group had a value of 2.9 and finally the crowd group had a value of rights, responsibilities and benefits of 1.7 which indicated that the value of rights, responsibilities and benefits of the parties would be lower as the level of influence and interest in the management of Nab ire TWA decreases.