在大型单中心队列中评估心脏肌球蛋白抑制剂在肥厚型心肌病治疗中的适用性

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-20 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2506225
Ali Amr, Elham Kayvanpour, Christoph Reich, Jan Koelemen, Shamily Asokan, Norbert Frey, Benjamin Meder, Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani
{"title":"在大型单中心队列中评估心脏肌球蛋白抑制剂在肥厚型心肌病治疗中的适用性","authors":"Ali Amr, Elham Kayvanpour, Christoph Reich, Jan Koelemen, Shamily Asokan, Norbert Frey, Benjamin Meder, Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2506225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs), including Mavacamten and Aficamten, have emerged as a groundbreaking treatment for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The results from phase 2 and 3 randomized clinical trials for both drugs have showed promising outcomes. However, the highly selective patient recruitment for these trials raises questions about the generalizability of the observed positive effects across broader patient populations suffering from HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study at University Hospital Heidelberg included 404 HCM patients. Baseline assessments included family history, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and advanced cardiac imaging, to ensure the exclusion of secondary causes of left ventricular hypertrophy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the HCM patients evaluated, only a small percentage met the inclusion criteria for recent CMI trials: 10.4% for EXPLORER-HCM and 4.7% for SEQUOIA-HCM. The predominant exclusion factor was the stringent left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient requirement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights a significant discrepancy between patient demographics in clinical trials and those encountered in routine HCM clinical practice. Despite promising results from the initial randomized clinical trials that led to the approval of Mavacamten, the selected patient population only represents a small part of the HCM patient cohort seen in routine clinics. This study advocates for further expanded randomized clinical trials with broader inclusion criteria to represent diverse primary HCM patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Applicability of Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Management in a Large Single Center Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Amr, Elham Kayvanpour, Christoph Reich, Jan Koelemen, Shamily Asokan, Norbert Frey, Benjamin Meder, Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.rcm2506225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs), including Mavacamten and Aficamten, have emerged as a groundbreaking treatment for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The results from phase 2 and 3 randomized clinical trials for both drugs have showed promising outcomes. However, the highly selective patient recruitment for these trials raises questions about the generalizability of the observed positive effects across broader patient populations suffering from HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study at University Hospital Heidelberg included 404 HCM patients. Baseline assessments included family history, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and advanced cardiac imaging, to ensure the exclusion of secondary causes of left ventricular hypertrophy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the HCM patients evaluated, only a small percentage met the inclusion criteria for recent CMI trials: 10.4% for EXPLORER-HCM and 4.7% for SEQUOIA-HCM. The predominant exclusion factor was the stringent left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient requirement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights a significant discrepancy between patient demographics in clinical trials and those encountered in routine HCM clinical practice. Despite promising results from the initial randomized clinical trials that led to the approval of Mavacamten, the selected patient population only represents a small part of the HCM patient cohort seen in routine clinics. This study advocates for further expanded randomized clinical trials with broader inclusion criteria to represent diverse primary HCM patient populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270100/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2506225\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2506225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心肌酶抑制剂(CMI),包括马伐康坦和阿非康坦,已成为治疗肥厚型心肌病(HCM)的突破性药物。这两种药物的 2 期和 3 期随机临床试验结果显示了良好的治疗效果。然而,这些试验对患者的招募具有很高的选择性,这使人们对所观察到的积极疗效能否在更广泛的 HCM 患者群体中推广产生了疑问:海德堡大学医院的一项回顾性队列研究纳入了 404 名 HCM 患者。基线评估包括家族史、心电图和先进的心脏成像,以确保排除继发性左心室肥厚的原因:在接受评估的 HCM 患者中,只有一小部分符合近期 CMI 试验的纳入标准:EXPLORER-HCM 试验的纳入标准为 10.4%,SEQUOIA-HCM 试验的纳入标准为 4.7%。主要的排除因素是严格的左心室流出道(LVOT)梯度要求:本研究强调了临床试验中的患者人口统计学特征与常规 HCM 临床实践中的患者人口统计学特征之间的显著差异。尽管最初的随机临床试验取得了令人鼓舞的结果,导致马伐康汀获得批准,但所选的患者人群仅代表常规临床中 HCM 患者群的一小部分。本研究主张进一步扩大随机临床试验的范围,采用更广泛的纳入标准,以代表不同的原发性 HCM 患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Applicability of Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Management in a Large Single Center Cohort.

Background: Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs), including Mavacamten and Aficamten, have emerged as a groundbreaking treatment for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The results from phase 2 and 3 randomized clinical trials for both drugs have showed promising outcomes. However, the highly selective patient recruitment for these trials raises questions about the generalizability of the observed positive effects across broader patient populations suffering from HCM.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study at University Hospital Heidelberg included 404 HCM patients. Baseline assessments included family history, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and advanced cardiac imaging, to ensure the exclusion of secondary causes of left ventricular hypertrophy.

Results: Among the HCM patients evaluated, only a small percentage met the inclusion criteria for recent CMI trials: 10.4% for EXPLORER-HCM and 4.7% for SEQUOIA-HCM. The predominant exclusion factor was the stringent left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient requirement.

Conclusions: This study highlights a significant discrepancy between patient demographics in clinical trials and those encountered in routine HCM clinical practice. Despite promising results from the initial randomized clinical trials that led to the approval of Mavacamten, the selected patient population only represents a small part of the HCM patient cohort seen in routine clinics. This study advocates for further expanded randomized clinical trials with broader inclusion criteria to represent diverse primary HCM patient populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信