左冠状动脉主干急性支架错位的临床意义。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-29 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2506196
Xi Wu, Mingxing Wu, Haobo Huang, Lei Wang, Zhe Liu, Jie Cai, He Huang
{"title":"左冠状动脉主干急性支架错位的临床意义。","authors":"Xi Wu, Mingxing Wu, Haobo Huang, Lei Wang, Zhe Liu, Jie Cai, He Huang","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2506196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been utilized to determine acute stent mal-apposition (ASM) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the left main coronary artery (LMCA). However, the clinical consequences of this finding remain uncertain. This research aimed to evaluate the clinical implications of ASM in the LMCA using IVUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 408 patients who underwent successful drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in the LMCA were evaluated. We analyzed the prevalence and characteristics of ASM and its correlation with clinical outcomes. ASM is characterized by stent struts that are not in immediate proximity to the intimal surface of the vessel wall after initial stent deployment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observed incidence of LMCA-ASM post-successful PCI was 26.2%, both per patient and per lesion. Lesions with LMCA-ASM had a longer stent diameter, larger stent areas, and larger lumen areas compared to those without LMCA-ASM (4.0 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.5 <i>vs</i>. 3.7 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.4 mm, <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001; 9.8 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 2.0 <i>vs</i>. 9.0 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.6 <math><msup><mi>mm</mi> <mn>2</mn></msup> </math> , <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001; 12.3 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.9 <i>vs</i>. 10.1 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 2.1 <math><msup><mi>mm</mi> <mn>2</mn></msup> </math> , <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001, respectively). The mean external elastic membrane (EEM) area (odds ratio (OR): 1.418 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.295-1.556]; <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001) emerged as an independent predictor of LMCA-ASM. During the observation period, LMCA-ASM did not display any association with device-oriented clinical endpoints (DoCE), which included cardiac death, target vessel-induced myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Moreover, the DoCE incidence exhibited no significant disparity between patients with or without ASM (13.1 <i>vs</i>. 6.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.103).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While LMCA-ASM was a not uncommon finding post-PCI, it did not correlate with adverse cardiac events in the present study.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Implications of Acute Stent Mal-Apposition in the Left Main Coronary Artery.\",\"authors\":\"Xi Wu, Mingxing Wu, Haobo Huang, Lei Wang, Zhe Liu, Jie Cai, He Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.rcm2506196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been utilized to determine acute stent mal-apposition (ASM) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the left main coronary artery (LMCA). However, the clinical consequences of this finding remain uncertain. This research aimed to evaluate the clinical implications of ASM in the LMCA using IVUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 408 patients who underwent successful drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in the LMCA were evaluated. We analyzed the prevalence and characteristics of ASM and its correlation with clinical outcomes. ASM is characterized by stent struts that are not in immediate proximity to the intimal surface of the vessel wall after initial stent deployment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observed incidence of LMCA-ASM post-successful PCI was 26.2%, both per patient and per lesion. Lesions with LMCA-ASM had a longer stent diameter, larger stent areas, and larger lumen areas compared to those without LMCA-ASM (4.0 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.5 <i>vs</i>. 3.7 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.4 mm, <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001; 9.8 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 2.0 <i>vs</i>. 9.0 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.6 <math><msup><mi>mm</mi> <mn>2</mn></msup> </math> , <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001; 12.3 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.9 <i>vs</i>. 10.1 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 2.1 <math><msup><mi>mm</mi> <mn>2</mn></msup> </math> , <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001, respectively). The mean external elastic membrane (EEM) area (odds ratio (OR): 1.418 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.295-1.556]; <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001) emerged as an independent predictor of LMCA-ASM. During the observation period, LMCA-ASM did not display any association with device-oriented clinical endpoints (DoCE), which included cardiac death, target vessel-induced myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Moreover, the DoCE incidence exhibited no significant disparity between patients with or without ASM (13.1 <i>vs</i>. 6.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.103).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While LMCA-ASM was a not uncommon finding post-PCI, it did not correlate with adverse cardiac events in the present study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270080/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2506196\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2506196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血管内超声(IVUS)已被用于确定左冠状动脉主干(LMCA)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的急性支架错位(ASM)。然而,这一发现的临床后果仍不确定。本研究旨在利用 IVUS 评估 LMCA 中 ASM 的临床影响:本研究评估了 408 例在 LMCA 成功植入药物洗脱支架(DES)的患者。我们分析了ASM的发生率、特征及其与临床结果的相关性。ASM的特征是支架在初次部署后,支架支杆没有紧贴血管壁内膜表面:PCI成功后观察到的LMCA-ASM发生率为26.2%,包括每位患者和每个病变。与没有 LMCA-ASM 的病变相比,有 LMCA-ASM 的病变的支架直径更长、支架面积更大、管腔面积更大(分别为 4.0 ± 0.5 vs. 3.7 ± 0.4 mm,P 0.001;9.8 ± 2.0 vs. 9.0 ± 1.6 mm 2,P 0.001;12.3 ± 1.9 vs. 10.1 ± 2.1 mm 2,P 0.001)。平均外部弹力膜(EEM)面积(几率比(OR):1.418 [95% 置信区间(CI):1.295-1.556];P 0.001)成为 LMCA-ASM 的独立预测因子。在观察期间,LMCA-ASM 与以设备为导向的临床终点(DoCE)没有任何关联,这些终点包括心源性死亡、靶血管诱发的心肌梗死(MI)、支架血栓和靶病变血管再通(TLR)。此外,有无ASM患者的DoCE发生率没有明显差异(13.1% vs. 6.0%,p = 0.103):结论:虽然LMCA-ASM在PCI术后并不少见,但在本研究中,它与不良心脏事件并无关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Implications of Acute Stent Mal-Apposition in the Left Main Coronary Artery.

Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been utilized to determine acute stent mal-apposition (ASM) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the left main coronary artery (LMCA). However, the clinical consequences of this finding remain uncertain. This research aimed to evaluate the clinical implications of ASM in the LMCA using IVUS.

Methods: In this study, 408 patients who underwent successful drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in the LMCA were evaluated. We analyzed the prevalence and characteristics of ASM and its correlation with clinical outcomes. ASM is characterized by stent struts that are not in immediate proximity to the intimal surface of the vessel wall after initial stent deployment.

Results: The observed incidence of LMCA-ASM post-successful PCI was 26.2%, both per patient and per lesion. Lesions with LMCA-ASM had a longer stent diameter, larger stent areas, and larger lumen areas compared to those without LMCA-ASM (4.0 ± 0.5 vs. 3.7 ± 0.4 mm, p < 0.001; 9.8 ± 2.0 vs. 9.0 ± 1.6 mm 2 , p < 0.001; 12.3 ± 1.9 vs. 10.1 ± 2.1 mm 2 , p < 0.001, respectively). The mean external elastic membrane (EEM) area (odds ratio (OR): 1.418 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.295-1.556]; p < 0.001) emerged as an independent predictor of LMCA-ASM. During the observation period, LMCA-ASM did not display any association with device-oriented clinical endpoints (DoCE), which included cardiac death, target vessel-induced myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Moreover, the DoCE incidence exhibited no significant disparity between patients with or without ASM (13.1 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.103).

Conclusions: While LMCA-ASM was a not uncommon finding post-PCI, it did not correlate with adverse cardiac events in the present study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信