单层定点检测法,可对抗耐多药革兰氏阴性病原体的噬菌体进行简便、快速和高通量的定量检测。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-08-14 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1128/jcm.00743-24
Paschalis Paranos, Spyros Pournaras, Joseph Meletiadis
{"title":"单层定点检测法,可对抗耐多药革兰氏阴性病原体的噬菌体进行简便、快速和高通量的定量检测。","authors":"Paschalis Paranos, Spyros Pournaras, Joseph Meletiadis","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00743-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Double-layer agar (DLA) overlay plaque assay is the gold standard for phage enumeration. However, it is cumbersome and time-consuming. Given the great interest in phage therapy, we explored alternative assays for phage quantitation. A total of 16 different phages belonging to Myoviridae, Siphoviridae, and Podoviridae families were quantitated with five <i>K</i>. <i>pneumoniae,</i> eight <i>P</i>. <i>aeruginosa,</i> and three <i>A</i>. <i>baumannii</i> host isolates. Phages were quantitated with the standard DLA assay (10 mL of LB soft agar 0.7% on LB hard agar 1.5%) and the new single-layer agar (SLA) assay (10 mL of LB soft agar 0.7%) with phages spread (spread) into or spotted (spot) onto soft agar. Phage concentrations with each assay were correlated with the standard assay, and the relative and absolute differences between each assay and the standard double-layer agar spread were calculated. Phage concentrations 1 × 10<sup>4</sup>-8.3 x10<sup>12</sup> PFU/mL with the standard DLA assay were quantitated with SLA-spread, SLA-spot, and DLA-spot assays, and the median (range) relative and absolute differences were <10% and <0.98 log<sub>10</sub>PFU/mL, respectively, for all phage/bacterial species (ANOVA <i>P</i> = 0.1-0.43), and they were highly correlated (r > 0.77, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Moreover, plaques could be quantified at 37°C after 4-h incubation for <i>K. pneumoniae</i> phages and 6-h incubation for <i>P. aeruginosa</i> and <i>A. baumannii</i> phages, and estimated concentrations remained the same over 24 hours. Compared to DLA assay, the SLA-spot assay required less media, it was 10 times faster, and generated same-day results. The SLA-spot assay was cheaper, faster, easier to perform, and generated similar phage concentrations as the standard DLA-spread assay.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0074324"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A single-layer spot assay for easy, fast, and high-throughput quantitation of phages against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.\",\"authors\":\"Paschalis Paranos, Spyros Pournaras, Joseph Meletiadis\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jcm.00743-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Double-layer agar (DLA) overlay plaque assay is the gold standard for phage enumeration. However, it is cumbersome and time-consuming. Given the great interest in phage therapy, we explored alternative assays for phage quantitation. A total of 16 different phages belonging to Myoviridae, Siphoviridae, and Podoviridae families were quantitated with five <i>K</i>. <i>pneumoniae,</i> eight <i>P</i>. <i>aeruginosa,</i> and three <i>A</i>. <i>baumannii</i> host isolates. Phages were quantitated with the standard DLA assay (10 mL of LB soft agar 0.7% on LB hard agar 1.5%) and the new single-layer agar (SLA) assay (10 mL of LB soft agar 0.7%) with phages spread (spread) into or spotted (spot) onto soft agar. Phage concentrations with each assay were correlated with the standard assay, and the relative and absolute differences between each assay and the standard double-layer agar spread were calculated. Phage concentrations 1 × 10<sup>4</sup>-8.3 x10<sup>12</sup> PFU/mL with the standard DLA assay were quantitated with SLA-spread, SLA-spot, and DLA-spot assays, and the median (range) relative and absolute differences were <10% and <0.98 log<sub>10</sub>PFU/mL, respectively, for all phage/bacterial species (ANOVA <i>P</i> = 0.1-0.43), and they were highly correlated (r > 0.77, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Moreover, plaques could be quantified at 37°C after 4-h incubation for <i>K. pneumoniae</i> phages and 6-h incubation for <i>P. aeruginosa</i> and <i>A. baumannii</i> phages, and estimated concentrations remained the same over 24 hours. Compared to DLA assay, the SLA-spot assay required less media, it was 10 times faster, and generated same-day results. The SLA-spot assay was cheaper, faster, easier to perform, and generated similar phage concentrations as the standard DLA-spread assay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0074324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00743-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00743-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双层琼脂(DLA)覆盖斑块检测法是噬菌体计数的黄金标准。然而,它既麻烦又耗时。鉴于噬菌体疗法备受关注,我们探索了噬菌体定量的替代检测方法。我们用 5 个肺炎克氏菌、8 个铜绿假单胞菌和 3 个鲍曼尼氏菌宿主分离物对属于肌病毒科、西普病毒科和 Podoviridae 科的 16 种不同噬菌体进行了定量。噬菌体的定量采用标准 DLA 检测法(10 mL LB 软琼脂 0.7%,LB 硬琼脂 1.5%)和新型单层琼脂(SLA)检测法(10 mL LB 软琼脂 0.7%),将噬菌体涂抹(扩散)到软琼脂上或斑点(点状)到软琼脂上。每种测定法的噬菌体浓度都与标准测定法相关,并计算出每种测定法与标准双层琼脂涂布法之间的相对差异和绝对差异。用标准 DLA 检测法定量的噬菌体浓度为 1 × 104-8.3 x1012 PFU/mL,用 SLA-铺展、SLA-斑点和 DLA-斑点检测法定量的噬菌体浓度为 1 × 104-8.3 x1012 PFU/mL,所有噬菌体/细菌种类的相对差异和绝对差异的中位数(范围)分别为 10PFU/mL(方差分析 P = 0.1-0.43),它们之间高度相关(r > 0.77,P < 0.01)。此外,肺炎克氏菌噬菌体在 37°C 孵育 4 小时后,铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼尼氏菌噬菌体在 37°C 孵育 6 小时后,可对斑块进行定量,估计浓度在 24 小时内保持不变。与 DLA 检测法相比,SLA-斑点检测法所需的培养基更少,速度快 10 倍,而且当天就能得出结果。SLA-斑点检测法成本更低、速度更快、操作更简便,产生的噬菌体浓度与标准的 DLA 扩增检测法相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A single-layer spot assay for easy, fast, and high-throughput quantitation of phages against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.

Double-layer agar (DLA) overlay plaque assay is the gold standard for phage enumeration. However, it is cumbersome and time-consuming. Given the great interest in phage therapy, we explored alternative assays for phage quantitation. A total of 16 different phages belonging to Myoviridae, Siphoviridae, and Podoviridae families were quantitated with five K. pneumoniae, eight P. aeruginosa, and three A. baumannii host isolates. Phages were quantitated with the standard DLA assay (10 mL of LB soft agar 0.7% on LB hard agar 1.5%) and the new single-layer agar (SLA) assay (10 mL of LB soft agar 0.7%) with phages spread (spread) into or spotted (spot) onto soft agar. Phage concentrations with each assay were correlated with the standard assay, and the relative and absolute differences between each assay and the standard double-layer agar spread were calculated. Phage concentrations 1 × 104-8.3 x1012 PFU/mL with the standard DLA assay were quantitated with SLA-spread, SLA-spot, and DLA-spot assays, and the median (range) relative and absolute differences were <10% and <0.98 log10PFU/mL, respectively, for all phage/bacterial species (ANOVA P = 0.1-0.43), and they were highly correlated (r > 0.77, P < 0.01). Moreover, plaques could be quantified at 37°C after 4-h incubation for K. pneumoniae phages and 6-h incubation for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii phages, and estimated concentrations remained the same over 24 hours. Compared to DLA assay, the SLA-spot assay required less media, it was 10 times faster, and generated same-day results. The SLA-spot assay was cheaper, faster, easier to perform, and generated similar phage concentrations as the standard DLA-spread assay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信