在急诊科使用直接喉镜为患者进行快速顺序插管时,床头抬高体位与仰卧嗅闻体位的对比 - 一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_109_23
Admala Anudeep Reddy, S Manu Ayyan, D Anandhi, Ezhilkugan Ganessane, V T Amrithanand
{"title":"在急诊科使用直接喉镜为患者进行快速顺序插管时,床头抬高体位与仰卧嗅闻体位的对比 - 一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Admala Anudeep Reddy, S Manu Ayyan, D Anandhi, Ezhilkugan Ganessane, V T Amrithanand","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_109_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study is to compare bed-up-head-elevated (BUHE) position with supine sniffing position (SSP) in patients undergoing rapid sequence intubation (RSI) using direct laryngoscopy in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center randomized controlled superiority trial was carried out from September 2021 to December 2022 in an academic emergency medicine department. The patients undergoing RSI in ED were grouped into two arms, namely BUHE position and SSP. The primary outcome was the time taken for endotracheal intubation. The secondary outcomes were the first-pass success rates and postintubation complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 patients were enrolled in the study. Time for intubation in the BUHE group was no different from SSP (32.09 s [interquartile range (IQR): 23.30-42.68] vs. 33.40 [IQR: 27.53-45.90], <i>P</i> = 0.17). There was a modest reduction in intubation time when performed by trained experts (22.5 s [IQR: 17.7-25.3] versus 30.3 s [IQR: 21.3-33.2], <i>P</i> = 0.04). The first-attempt success rate in the BUHE position was also similar to the SSP position ([91.18% vs. 90.91%] <i>P</i> = 0.958). Postintubation complications were lesser in BUHE compared to the SSP group ([7.4% vs. 19.7%] <i>P</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, BUHE position did not improve time to intubation and first-pass success rate in ED patients compared to SSP. A modest decrease in intubation time was noted while experts used the BUHE position. The postintubation complications were slightly lesser in the BUHE group.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11279501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bed-up-head-elevated Position versus Supine Sniffing Position in Patients Undergoing Rapid Sequence Intubation Using Direct Laryngoscopy in the Emergency Department - A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Admala Anudeep Reddy, S Manu Ayyan, D Anandhi, Ezhilkugan Ganessane, V T Amrithanand\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jets.jets_109_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study is to compare bed-up-head-elevated (BUHE) position with supine sniffing position (SSP) in patients undergoing rapid sequence intubation (RSI) using direct laryngoscopy in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center randomized controlled superiority trial was carried out from September 2021 to December 2022 in an academic emergency medicine department. The patients undergoing RSI in ED were grouped into two arms, namely BUHE position and SSP. The primary outcome was the time taken for endotracheal intubation. The secondary outcomes were the first-pass success rates and postintubation complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 patients were enrolled in the study. Time for intubation in the BUHE group was no different from SSP (32.09 s [interquartile range (IQR): 23.30-42.68] vs. 33.40 [IQR: 27.53-45.90], <i>P</i> = 0.17). There was a modest reduction in intubation time when performed by trained experts (22.5 s [IQR: 17.7-25.3] versus 30.3 s [IQR: 21.3-33.2], <i>P</i> = 0.04). The first-attempt success rate in the BUHE position was also similar to the SSP position ([91.18% vs. 90.91%] <i>P</i> = 0.958). Postintubation complications were lesser in BUHE compared to the SSP group ([7.4% vs. 19.7%] <i>P</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, BUHE position did not improve time to intubation and first-pass success rate in ED patients compared to SSP. A modest decrease in intubation time was noted while experts used the BUHE position. The postintubation complications were slightly lesser in the BUHE group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11279501/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_109_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_109_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究的目的是比较在急诊科(ED)使用直接喉镜对患者进行快速顺序插管(RSI)时的卧床抬头位(BUHE)与仰卧嗅闻位(SSP):这项单中心随机对照优越性试验于 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 12 月在一家学术性急诊科进行。在急诊科接受 RSI 的患者分为两组,即 BUHE 体位和 SSP 体位。主要结果是气管插管所需的时间。次要结果是首次插管成功率和插管后并发症:结果:共有 136 名患者参与了研究。BUHE 组的插管时间与 SSP 组无异(32.09 秒[四分位数间距(IQR):23.30-42.68] vs. 33.40 [四分位数间距(IQR):27.53-45.90],P = 0.17)。由训练有素的专家进行插管时,插管时间略有缩短(22.5 秒 [IQR: 17.7-25.3] 对 30.3 秒 [IQR: 21.3-33.2] ,P = 0.04)。BUHE体位的首次尝试成功率也与SSP体位相似([91.18% vs. 90.91%] P = 0.958)。BUHE 组的插管后并发症少于 SSP 组([7.4% vs. 19.7%] P = 0.04):结论:在我们的研究中,与 SSP 相比,BUHE 体位并不能改善急诊患者的插管时间和首次插管成功率。专家采用 BUHE 体位时,插管时间略有减少。BUHE 组的插管后并发症略少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bed-up-head-elevated Position versus Supine Sniffing Position in Patients Undergoing Rapid Sequence Intubation Using Direct Laryngoscopy in the Emergency Department - A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: The objective of this study is to compare bed-up-head-elevated (BUHE) position with supine sniffing position (SSP) in patients undergoing rapid sequence intubation (RSI) using direct laryngoscopy in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: This single-center randomized controlled superiority trial was carried out from September 2021 to December 2022 in an academic emergency medicine department. The patients undergoing RSI in ED were grouped into two arms, namely BUHE position and SSP. The primary outcome was the time taken for endotracheal intubation. The secondary outcomes were the first-pass success rates and postintubation complications.

Results: A total of 136 patients were enrolled in the study. Time for intubation in the BUHE group was no different from SSP (32.09 s [interquartile range (IQR): 23.30-42.68] vs. 33.40 [IQR: 27.53-45.90], P = 0.17). There was a modest reduction in intubation time when performed by trained experts (22.5 s [IQR: 17.7-25.3] versus 30.3 s [IQR: 21.3-33.2], P = 0.04). The first-attempt success rate in the BUHE position was also similar to the SSP position ([91.18% vs. 90.91%] P = 0.958). Postintubation complications were lesser in BUHE compared to the SSP group ([7.4% vs. 19.7%] P = 0.04).

Conclusions: In our study, BUHE position did not improve time to intubation and first-pass success rate in ED patients compared to SSP. A modest decrease in intubation time was noted while experts used the BUHE position. The postintubation complications were slightly lesser in the BUHE group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信