实践中的体能评估:对自行车运动成绩预测和建模进展的系统回顾

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Loes Stessens, Jasper Gielen, Romain Meeusen, Jean-Marie Aerts
{"title":"实践中的体能评估:对自行车运动成绩预测和建模进展的系统回顾","authors":"Loes Stessens, Jasper Gielen, Romain Meeusen, Jean-Marie Aerts","doi":"10.1177/17479541241262385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physical performance in cycling is commonly evaluated with laboratory-based performance markers. However, these markers are not monitored on a regular basis, mainly due to the high costs of testing equipment, invasive sampling and time-intensive protocols. The use of mathematical modeling offers a promising alternative allowing for consistent performance monitoring, identification of influential variables affecting performance, and facilitation of planning, monitoring, and predictive analysis. Wearable technology, such as physiological and biomechanical sensors, can be integrated with mathematical models to enhance the practicality of performance monitoring and enable real-time feedback and personalized training recommendations. In this systematic review, we attempted to provide an overview of the developments in predicting and modeling of performance in cycling and their respective practical applications. The PRISMA framework yielded 52 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The models were discussed according to their modeling goal: characterizing kinetics, alternatives to the gold-standard, training control, observing training effects, predicting competitive performance and optimizing performance. Field-based models and technological advancements were highlighted as solutions to the limitations of gold-standard testing. Due to the lower accuracies of modeling techniques, the gold-standard laboratory-based methods of testing will not be replaced by mathematical models. However, models do form a more practical alternative for regular monitoring and a powerful tool for training and competition optimization. A modeling technique needs to be individualized to the goal and the person and be as simple as possible to allow regular monitoring. Ideally, the technique would work in the field, uses submaximal exercise intensities and integrates technological advancements such as wearable technology and machine learning to increase the practicality even more.","PeriodicalId":47767,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical performance estimation in practice: A systematic review of advancements in performance prediction and modeling in cycling\",\"authors\":\"Loes Stessens, Jasper Gielen, Romain Meeusen, Jean-Marie Aerts\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17479541241262385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Physical performance in cycling is commonly evaluated with laboratory-based performance markers. However, these markers are not monitored on a regular basis, mainly due to the high costs of testing equipment, invasive sampling and time-intensive protocols. The use of mathematical modeling offers a promising alternative allowing for consistent performance monitoring, identification of influential variables affecting performance, and facilitation of planning, monitoring, and predictive analysis. Wearable technology, such as physiological and biomechanical sensors, can be integrated with mathematical models to enhance the practicality of performance monitoring and enable real-time feedback and personalized training recommendations. In this systematic review, we attempted to provide an overview of the developments in predicting and modeling of performance in cycling and their respective practical applications. The PRISMA framework yielded 52 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The models were discussed according to their modeling goal: characterizing kinetics, alternatives to the gold-standard, training control, observing training effects, predicting competitive performance and optimizing performance. Field-based models and technological advancements were highlighted as solutions to the limitations of gold-standard testing. Due to the lower accuracies of modeling techniques, the gold-standard laboratory-based methods of testing will not be replaced by mathematical models. However, models do form a more practical alternative for regular monitoring and a powerful tool for training and competition optimization. A modeling technique needs to be individualized to the goal and the person and be as simple as possible to allow regular monitoring. Ideally, the technique would work in the field, uses submaximal exercise intensities and integrates technological advancements such as wearable technology and machine learning to increase the practicality even more.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241262385\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241262385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自行车运动中的体能表现通常是通过基于实验室的性能指标来评估的。然而,这些指标并不是定期监测的,这主要是由于测试设备、侵入性采样和时间密集型规程的成本较高。数学模型的使用提供了一种很有前景的替代方法,它可以进行持续的成绩监测,识别影响成绩的变量,并促进计划、监测和预测分析。生理和生物力学传感器等可穿戴技术可与数学模型相结合,提高成绩监测的实用性,实现实时反馈和个性化训练建议。在这篇系统性综述中,我们试图概述自行车运动成绩预测和建模的发展及其各自的实际应用。根据 PRISMA 框架,共有 52 项研究符合纳入标准。我们根据建模目标对模型进行了讨论:动力学特征、黄金标准的替代方案、训练控制、观察训练效果、预测竞技成绩和优化成绩。与会者强调,基于实地的模型和技术进步是解决黄金标准测试局限性的办法。由于建模技术的精确度较低,基于实验室的黄金标准测试方法不会被数学模型所取代。然而,模型确实是定期监测的一种更实用的替代方法,也是训练和比赛优化的有力工具。建模技术需要针对目标和个人进行个性化设计,并尽可能简单,以便进行定期监测。理想的情况是,这种技术能在野外工作,使用亚极限运动强度,并结合可穿戴技术和机器学习等先进技术,以进一步提高实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physical performance estimation in practice: A systematic review of advancements in performance prediction and modeling in cycling
Physical performance in cycling is commonly evaluated with laboratory-based performance markers. However, these markers are not monitored on a regular basis, mainly due to the high costs of testing equipment, invasive sampling and time-intensive protocols. The use of mathematical modeling offers a promising alternative allowing for consistent performance monitoring, identification of influential variables affecting performance, and facilitation of planning, monitoring, and predictive analysis. Wearable technology, such as physiological and biomechanical sensors, can be integrated with mathematical models to enhance the practicality of performance monitoring and enable real-time feedback and personalized training recommendations. In this systematic review, we attempted to provide an overview of the developments in predicting and modeling of performance in cycling and their respective practical applications. The PRISMA framework yielded 52 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The models were discussed according to their modeling goal: characterizing kinetics, alternatives to the gold-standard, training control, observing training effects, predicting competitive performance and optimizing performance. Field-based models and technological advancements were highlighted as solutions to the limitations of gold-standard testing. Due to the lower accuracies of modeling techniques, the gold-standard laboratory-based methods of testing will not be replaced by mathematical models. However, models do form a more practical alternative for regular monitoring and a powerful tool for training and competition optimization. A modeling technique needs to be individualized to the goal and the person and be as simple as possible to allow regular monitoring. Ideally, the technique would work in the field, uses submaximal exercise intensities and integrates technological advancements such as wearable technology and machine learning to increase the practicality even more.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching is a peer-reviewed, international, academic/professional journal, which aims to bridge the gap between coaching and sports science. The journal will integrate theory and practice in sports science, promote critical reflection of coaching practice, and evaluate commonly accepted beliefs about coaching effectiveness and performance enhancement. Open learning systems will be promoted in which: (a) sports science is made accessible to coaches, translating knowledge into working practice; and (b) the challenges faced by coaches are communicated to sports scientists. The vision of the journal is to support the development of a community in which: (i) sports scientists and coaches respect and learn from each other as they assist athletes to acquire skills by training safely and effectively, thereby enhancing their performance, maximizing their enjoyment of the sporting experience and facilitating character development; and (ii) scientific research is embraced in the quest to uncover, understand and develop the processes involved in sports coaching and elite performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信