不道德的亲组织行为:系统文献综述和研究议程

IF 1.7 Q2 ECONOMICS
Ujjal Mukherjee, Saritha S.R.
{"title":"不道德的亲组织行为:系统文献综述和研究议程","authors":"Ujjal Mukherjee, Saritha S.R.","doi":"10.1108/ijoes-11-2023-0243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The literature on unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPOB) has experienced significant growth in the past decade. However, there is limited research on the effects of organizational, team and malleable individual factors on UPOB. It is also necessary to explore its adverse effects for theoretical advancement and to uncover unexplored opportunities. This study aims to systematically examine the existing body of literature on UPOB, providing thorough theoretical, contextual and methodological insights.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis technique, the authors identified 43 articles on UPOB from journals included in the ABDC-2019 list. The authors conducted an analysis of the identified articles and categorized them using a modified version of Paul and Rosado-Serrano’s (2019) TCCM framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Existing literature primarily focuses on attitudinal and contextual antecedents of UPOB, neglecting individual differences and their consequences. The review suggests that certain desired employee attitudes may also lead to UPOB. In addition, the study highlights underutilization of established behavioral theories, emphasizing the need for a more inclusive theoretical framework. The exploration identifies research gaps, including in multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary studies, aiming to broaden the research scope in this field.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The study highlights the need for a more comprehensive theoretical framework to understand UPOB.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>It cautions organizations fostering positive employee attitudes, such as job satisfaction, workplace spirituality and organizational commitment, as these may inadvertently promote UPOB.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>Socially, the paper highlights how engaging in UPOB affects the lives of involved employees.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper’s originality arises from its methodical review and categorization of prior research on UPOB using a distinctive, multidisciplinary research framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":42832,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ethics and Systems","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unethical pro-organizational behavior: a systematic literature review and research agenda\",\"authors\":\"Ujjal Mukherjee, Saritha S.R.\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijoes-11-2023-0243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The literature on unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPOB) has experienced significant growth in the past decade. However, there is limited research on the effects of organizational, team and malleable individual factors on UPOB. It is also necessary to explore its adverse effects for theoretical advancement and to uncover unexplored opportunities. This study aims to systematically examine the existing body of literature on UPOB, providing thorough theoretical, contextual and methodological insights.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis technique, the authors identified 43 articles on UPOB from journals included in the ABDC-2019 list. The authors conducted an analysis of the identified articles and categorized them using a modified version of Paul and Rosado-Serrano’s (2019) TCCM framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Existing literature primarily focuses on attitudinal and contextual antecedents of UPOB, neglecting individual differences and their consequences. The review suggests that certain desired employee attitudes may also lead to UPOB. In addition, the study highlights underutilization of established behavioral theories, emphasizing the need for a more inclusive theoretical framework. The exploration identifies research gaps, including in multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary studies, aiming to broaden the research scope in this field.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The study highlights the need for a more comprehensive theoretical framework to understand UPOB.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>It cautions organizations fostering positive employee attitudes, such as job satisfaction, workplace spirituality and organizational commitment, as these may inadvertently promote UPOB.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\\n<p>Socially, the paper highlights how engaging in UPOB affects the lives of involved employees.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This paper’s originality arises from its methodical review and categorization of prior research on UPOB using a distinctive, multidisciplinary research framework.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":42832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Ethics and Systems\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Ethics and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-11-2023-0243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ethics and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-11-2023-0243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 在过去十年中,有关不道德的亲组织行为(UPOB)的文献有了显著增长。然而,关于组织、团队和可塑性个人因素对 UPOB 的影响的研究却很有限。同时,有必要探讨其不利影响,以促进理论进步,并发掘尚未开发的机会。本研究旨在系统研究现有的关于 UPOB 的文献,提供全面的理论、背景和方法论见解。设计/方法/途径作者采用系统综述的首选报告项目和荟萃分析技术,从 ABDC-2019 列表中的期刊中识别出 43 篇关于 UPOB 的文章。作者对所确定的文章进行了分析,并使用保罗和罗萨多-塞拉诺(2019 年)的 TCCM 框架的修改版对这些文章进行了分类。研究结果现有文献主要关注 UPOB 的态度和背景前因,忽视了个体差异及其后果。综述表明,某些理想的员工态度也可能导致 UPOB。此外,研究还强调了对既有行为理论的利用不足,强调需要一个更具包容性的理论框架。研究局限/影响本研究强调,需要一个更全面的理论框架来理解 UPOB。实践意义本研究提醒组织要培养积极的员工态度,如工作满意度、工作场所精神和组织承诺,因为这些可能会无意中促进 UPOB。社会意义从社会角度看,本文强调了参与 UPOB 如何影响参与其中的员工的生活。原创性/价值本文的原创性来自于它采用独特的多学科研究框架,对之前有关 UPOB 的研究进行了有条不紊的回顾和分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unethical pro-organizational behavior: a systematic literature review and research agenda

Purpose

The literature on unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPOB) has experienced significant growth in the past decade. However, there is limited research on the effects of organizational, team and malleable individual factors on UPOB. It is also necessary to explore its adverse effects for theoretical advancement and to uncover unexplored opportunities. This study aims to systematically examine the existing body of literature on UPOB, providing thorough theoretical, contextual and methodological insights.

Design/methodology/approach

Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis technique, the authors identified 43 articles on UPOB from journals included in the ABDC-2019 list. The authors conducted an analysis of the identified articles and categorized them using a modified version of Paul and Rosado-Serrano’s (2019) TCCM framework.

Findings

Existing literature primarily focuses on attitudinal and contextual antecedents of UPOB, neglecting individual differences and their consequences. The review suggests that certain desired employee attitudes may also lead to UPOB. In addition, the study highlights underutilization of established behavioral theories, emphasizing the need for a more inclusive theoretical framework. The exploration identifies research gaps, including in multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary studies, aiming to broaden the research scope in this field.

Research limitations/implications

The study highlights the need for a more comprehensive theoretical framework to understand UPOB.

Practical implications

It cautions organizations fostering positive employee attitudes, such as job satisfaction, workplace spirituality and organizational commitment, as these may inadvertently promote UPOB.

Social implications

Socially, the paper highlights how engaging in UPOB affects the lives of involved employees.

Originality/value

This paper’s originality arises from its methodical review and categorization of prior research on UPOB using a distinctive, multidisciplinary research framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Ethics and Systems (formerly named Humanomics, the International Journal of Systems and Ethics) is a multidisciplinary journal publishing peer review research on issues of ethics and morality affecting socio-scientific systems in epistemological perspectives. The journal covers diverse areas of a socio-scientific nature. The focus is on disseminating the theory and practice of morality and ethics as a system-oriented study defined by inter-causality between critical variables of given problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信