缺血性中风血管内治疗后预后模型的验证。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pedro Martins, Krishna Sambhu, Mohamed Tarek, Jaydevsinh Dolia, Aqueel Pabaney, Jonathan Grossberg, Raul Nogueira, Diogo Haussen
{"title":"缺血性中风血管内治疗后预后模型的验证。","authors":"Pedro Martins, Krishna Sambhu, Mohamed Tarek, Jaydevsinh Dolia, Aqueel Pabaney, Jonathan Grossberg, Raul Nogueira, Diogo Haussen","doi":"10.1177/15910199241265134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The recently developed MR-PREDICTS@24 h model showed excellent performance in the MR-CLEAN Registry cohort in patients presenting within 12 h from onset. However, its applicability to an U.S. population and to patients presenting beyond 12 h from last known normal are still undetermined. We aim to externally validate the MR-PREDICTS@24 h model in a new geographic setting and in the late window.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database from a comprehensive stroke center in the United States, we included patients with intracranial carotid artery or middle cerebral artery M1 or M2 segment occlusions who underwent endovascular therapy and applied the MR-PREDICTS@24 h formula to estimate the probabilities of functional outcome at day 90. The primary endpoint was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1246 patients, 879 in the early (<12 h) and 367 in the late (≥12 h) cohort. For both cohorts, calibration and discrimination of the model were accurate throughout mRS levels, with absolute differences between estimated and predicted proportions ranging from 1% to 5%. Calibration metrics and curve inspections showed good performance for estimating the probabilities of mRS ≤ 1 to mRS ≤ 5 for the early cohort. For the late cohort, predictions were reliable for the probabilities of mRS ≤ 1 to mRS ≤ 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MR-PREDICTS@24 h was transferrable to a real-world U.S.-based cohort in the early window and showed consistently accurate predictions for patients presenting in the late window without need for updating.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241265134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a model for outcome prediction after endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Martins, Krishna Sambhu, Mohamed Tarek, Jaydevsinh Dolia, Aqueel Pabaney, Jonathan Grossberg, Raul Nogueira, Diogo Haussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199241265134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The recently developed MR-PREDICTS@24 h model showed excellent performance in the MR-CLEAN Registry cohort in patients presenting within 12 h from onset. However, its applicability to an U.S. population and to patients presenting beyond 12 h from last known normal are still undetermined. We aim to externally validate the MR-PREDICTS@24 h model in a new geographic setting and in the late window.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database from a comprehensive stroke center in the United States, we included patients with intracranial carotid artery or middle cerebral artery M1 or M2 segment occlusions who underwent endovascular therapy and applied the MR-PREDICTS@24 h formula to estimate the probabilities of functional outcome at day 90. The primary endpoint was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1246 patients, 879 in the early (<12 h) and 367 in the late (≥12 h) cohort. For both cohorts, calibration and discrimination of the model were accurate throughout mRS levels, with absolute differences between estimated and predicted proportions ranging from 1% to 5%. Calibration metrics and curve inspections showed good performance for estimating the probabilities of mRS ≤ 1 to mRS ≤ 5 for the early cohort. For the late cohort, predictions were reliable for the probabilities of mRS ≤ 1 to mRS ≤ 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MR-PREDICTS@24 h was transferrable to a real-world U.S.-based cohort in the early window and showed consistently accurate predictions for patients presenting in the late window without need for updating.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199241265134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571141/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241265134\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241265134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:最近开发的 MR-PREDICTS@24 h 模型在 MR-CLEAN 注册队列中对发病 12 h 内的患者表现出了卓越的性能。然而,该模型是否适用于美国人群以及从最后一次已知正常情况起 12 小时后发病的患者仍未确定。我们的目标是在新的地域环境和晚期窗口期对 MR-PREDICTS@24 h 模型进行外部验证:在这项对美国一家综合卒中中心前瞻性收集的数据库进行的回顾性分析中,我们纳入了接受血管内治疗的颅内颈动脉或大脑中动脉 M1 或 M2 段闭塞患者,并应用 MR-PREDICTS@24 h 公式估算了第 90 天的功能预后概率。主要终点是90天时的改良Rankin量表(mRS):结果:我们共纳入了 1246 名患者,其中 879 名为早期患者:MR-PREDICTS@24 h可在早期窗口期应用于真实世界中的美国队列,对晚期窗口期患者的预测始终准确,无需更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of a model for outcome prediction after endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke.

Introduction: The recently developed MR-PREDICTS@24 h model showed excellent performance in the MR-CLEAN Registry cohort in patients presenting within 12 h from onset. However, its applicability to an U.S. population and to patients presenting beyond 12 h from last known normal are still undetermined. We aim to externally validate the MR-PREDICTS@24 h model in a new geographic setting and in the late window.

Methods: In this retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database from a comprehensive stroke center in the United States, we included patients with intracranial carotid artery or middle cerebral artery M1 or M2 segment occlusions who underwent endovascular therapy and applied the MR-PREDICTS@24 h formula to estimate the probabilities of functional outcome at day 90. The primary endpoint was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days.

Results: We included 1246 patients, 879 in the early (<12 h) and 367 in the late (≥12 h) cohort. For both cohorts, calibration and discrimination of the model were accurate throughout mRS levels, with absolute differences between estimated and predicted proportions ranging from 1% to 5%. Calibration metrics and curve inspections showed good performance for estimating the probabilities of mRS ≤ 1 to mRS ≤ 5 for the early cohort. For the late cohort, predictions were reliable for the probabilities of mRS ≤ 1 to mRS ≤ 4.

Conclusion: The MR-PREDICTS@24 h was transferrable to a real-world U.S.-based cohort in the early window and showed consistently accurate predictions for patients presenting in the late window without need for updating.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信