打破我们每天的 "超加工 "面包。

IF 15.8 1区医学 Q1 Medicine

PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-25 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004437

Giles S H Yeo

引用次数: 0

摘要

在社论中，Giles Yeo 讨论了 UPF 概念是否可能弊大于利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Breaking our daily "ultra-processed" bread.

In the Editorial, Giles Yeo discusses if it is possible that the UPF concept could be doing more harm than good.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-

CiteScore

17.60

自引率

0.60%

发文量

227

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.