单阶段心肺和超声心动图联合运动测试的新方案:一项试验研究。

European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice Pub Date : 2024-03-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjimp/qyae021
Dan M Dorobantu, Curtis A Wadey, Ben Berryman, Nurul H Amir, Lynsey Forsythe, A Graham Stuart, Guido E Pieles, Craig A Williams
{"title":"单阶段心肺和超声心动图联合运动测试的新方案:一项试验研究。","authors":"Dan M Dorobantu, Curtis A Wadey, Ben Berryman, Nurul H Amir, Lynsey Forsythe, A Graham Stuart, Guido E Pieles, Craig A Williams","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in managing cardiac disease is well known, but no standard CPET-ESE protocol is currently recommended. This pilot study aims to compare feasibility and cardiac function responses between a new high-intensity single-stage combined test (CPET-hiESE) and a standard maximal ESE (smESE).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>After screening and maximal CPET, all volunteers (<i>n</i> = 21) underwent three ESE modalities: (i) based on the gas exchange threshold (hiESE-GET, 40% of peak-GET, 6 min), (ii) based on heart rate (HR) (hiESE-HR, 80% of peak HR, 6 min), and (iii) smESE (85% of predicted peak HR for age, 3 min). Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) were measured at each step. There was superior image quality and data completeness for the right ventricle strain for both hiESE modalities compared with smESE (71.4 and 76.2 vs. 42.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.07). Left ventricular STE data completeness was similar for all three conditions. Despite systematically higher HR, work rate and levels of exertion in the smESE compared with hiESE, STE and TDI parameters were not systematically different. Concordance correlation coefficients ranged from 0.56 to 0.88, lowest for strain rate parameters and mean difference from -0.34 to 1.53, highest for TDI measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel CPET-hiESE protocol allowed for better data completeness, at lower levels of exertion compared with smESE, without systematically different cardiac reserve measurements in healthy participants. This single-stage protocol can be individualized to clinical populations, which would provide practical advantages to standard testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new protocol for a single-stage combined cardiopulmonary and echocardiography exercise test: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Dan M Dorobantu, Curtis A Wadey, Ben Berryman, Nurul H Amir, Lynsey Forsythe, A Graham Stuart, Guido E Pieles, Craig A Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in managing cardiac disease is well known, but no standard CPET-ESE protocol is currently recommended. This pilot study aims to compare feasibility and cardiac function responses between a new high-intensity single-stage combined test (CPET-hiESE) and a standard maximal ESE (smESE).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>After screening and maximal CPET, all volunteers (<i>n</i> = 21) underwent three ESE modalities: (i) based on the gas exchange threshold (hiESE-GET, 40% of peak-GET, 6 min), (ii) based on heart rate (HR) (hiESE-HR, 80% of peak HR, 6 min), and (iii) smESE (85% of predicted peak HR for age, 3 min). Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) were measured at each step. There was superior image quality and data completeness for the right ventricle strain for both hiESE modalities compared with smESE (71.4 and 76.2 vs. 42.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.07). Left ventricular STE data completeness was similar for all three conditions. Despite systematically higher HR, work rate and levels of exertion in the smESE compared with hiESE, STE and TDI parameters were not systematically different. Concordance correlation coefficients ranged from 0.56 to 0.88, lowest for strain rate parameters and mean difference from -0.34 to 1.53, highest for TDI measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel CPET-hiESE protocol allowed for better data completeness, at lower levels of exertion compared with smESE, without systematically different cardiac reserve measurements in healthy participants. This single-stage protocol can be individualized to clinical populations, which would provide practical advantages to standard testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心肺运动测试(CPET)和运动负荷超声心动图(ESE)在心脏病治疗中的价值众所周知,但目前尚未推荐标准的 CPET-ESE 方案。本试验研究旨在比较新的高强度单阶段联合测试(CPET-hiESE)和标准最大 ESE(smESE)的可行性和心功能反应:在筛查和最大 CPET 之后,所有志愿者(n = 21)接受了三种 ESE 模式:(i) 基于气体交换阈值(hiESE-GET,峰值-GET 的 40%,6 分钟);(ii) 基于心率(HR)(hiESE-HR,峰值 HR 的 80%,6 分钟);(iii) smESE(年龄预测峰值 HR 的 85%,3 分钟)。每个步骤都测量了斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)和组织多普勒成像(TDI)。与 smESE 相比,两种 hiESE 模式的右心室应变的图像质量和数据完整性都更好(71.4% 和 76.2% 对 42.9%,P = 0.07)。在所有三种情况下,左心室 STE 数据完整性相似。尽管与 hiESE 相比,smESE 的心率、工作率和用力程度明显更高,但 STE 和 TDI 参数并无明显差异。一致性相关系数从 0.56 到 0.88 不等,应变率参数最低,平均差异从 -0.34 到 1.53 不等,TDI 测量最高:结论:与 smESE 相比,新的 CPET-hiESE 方案能在较低的负荷水平下获得更完整的数据,但对健康参与者的心脏储备测量结果并无系统性差异。这种单阶段方案可根据临床人群进行个体化设计,这将为标准测试提供实用优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new protocol for a single-stage combined cardiopulmonary and echocardiography exercise test: a pilot study.

Aims: The value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in managing cardiac disease is well known, but no standard CPET-ESE protocol is currently recommended. This pilot study aims to compare feasibility and cardiac function responses between a new high-intensity single-stage combined test (CPET-hiESE) and a standard maximal ESE (smESE).

Methods and results: After screening and maximal CPET, all volunteers (n = 21) underwent three ESE modalities: (i) based on the gas exchange threshold (hiESE-GET, 40% of peak-GET, 6 min), (ii) based on heart rate (HR) (hiESE-HR, 80% of peak HR, 6 min), and (iii) smESE (85% of predicted peak HR for age, 3 min). Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) were measured at each step. There was superior image quality and data completeness for the right ventricle strain for both hiESE modalities compared with smESE (71.4 and 76.2 vs. 42.9%, P = 0.07). Left ventricular STE data completeness was similar for all three conditions. Despite systematically higher HR, work rate and levels of exertion in the smESE compared with hiESE, STE and TDI parameters were not systematically different. Concordance correlation coefficients ranged from 0.56 to 0.88, lowest for strain rate parameters and mean difference from -0.34 to 1.53, highest for TDI measurements.

Conclusion: The novel CPET-hiESE protocol allowed for better data completeness, at lower levels of exertion compared with smESE, without systematically different cardiac reserve measurements in healthy participants. This single-stage protocol can be individualized to clinical populations, which would provide practical advantages to standard testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信