社会互动新范式的形成:关于接触和不接触

Consortium psychiatricum Pub Date : 2022-07-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17816/CP163
Roger Smith
{"title":"社会互动新范式的形成:关于接触和不接触","authors":"Roger Smith","doi":"10.17816/CP163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic greatly accelerated the use of online technologies for communication, as opposed to contact involving physical presence and touch. This commentary further considers the consequences of this change in individual human terms, in everyday as well as medical situations. It is a kind of discussion paper, specially written for this journal. It develops two directions of argument, the first about the reality of embodiment, the second about figures of speech involving touch and movement, figures of speech about the actions of whole people rather than about mind (spirit) or body separately. The discussion reviews the nature of differences between communication involving physical proximity and physical distance (and electronic media), with comments on the positive and negative aspects of each. An emphasis on the significance of touch (and movement, since all touch involves movement) to people is linked to the basic aspects of the lifecycle in birth, reproduction, and death. In conclusion, the discussion emphasizes the traditional importance of touch and physical participation to people's feeling for reality. New digital forms of relations disturb this feel, with significant consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":519873,"journal":{"name":"Consortium psychiatricum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formation of a New Paradigm of Social Interaction: On Touching and on not Touching.\",\"authors\":\"Roger Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/CP163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic greatly accelerated the use of online technologies for communication, as opposed to contact involving physical presence and touch. This commentary further considers the consequences of this change in individual human terms, in everyday as well as medical situations. It is a kind of discussion paper, specially written for this journal. It develops two directions of argument, the first about the reality of embodiment, the second about figures of speech involving touch and movement, figures of speech about the actions of whole people rather than about mind (spirit) or body separately. The discussion reviews the nature of differences between communication involving physical proximity and physical distance (and electronic media), with comments on the positive and negative aspects of each. An emphasis on the significance of touch (and movement, since all touch involves movement) to people is linked to the basic aspects of the lifecycle in birth, reproduction, and death. In conclusion, the discussion emphasizes the traditional importance of touch and physical participation to people's feeling for reality. New digital forms of relations disturb this feel, with significant consequences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consortium psychiatricum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262107/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consortium psychiatricum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/CP163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consortium psychiatricum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/CP163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行极大地加速了网络技术在交流中的应用,而不是通过身体接触来进行交流。本评论进一步探讨了这一变化在日常生活和医疗环境中对人类个体造成的影响。这是一篇专门为本刊撰写的讨论文章。它有两个论证方向,第一个方向是关于 "化身 "的现实,第二个方向是关于涉及触觉和运动的语言表达,这些语言表达是关于整个人的行为,而不是分别关于思想(精神)或身体。讨论回顾了身体近距离交流与身体远距离交流(以及电子媒体)之间的本质区别,并对两者的积极和消极方面进行了评论。强调触觉(和运动,因为所有触觉都涉及运动)对人的意义,并将其与出生、繁殖和死亡等生命周期的基本方面联系起来。总之,讨论强调了触觉和身体参与对人们感受现实的传统重要性。新的数字关系形式扰乱了这种感觉,造成了严重后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formation of a New Paradigm of Social Interaction: On Touching and on not Touching.

The COVID-19 pandemic greatly accelerated the use of online technologies for communication, as opposed to contact involving physical presence and touch. This commentary further considers the consequences of this change in individual human terms, in everyday as well as medical situations. It is a kind of discussion paper, specially written for this journal. It develops two directions of argument, the first about the reality of embodiment, the second about figures of speech involving touch and movement, figures of speech about the actions of whole people rather than about mind (spirit) or body separately. The discussion reviews the nature of differences between communication involving physical proximity and physical distance (and electronic media), with comments on the positive and negative aspects of each. An emphasis on the significance of touch (and movement, since all touch involves movement) to people is linked to the basic aspects of the lifecycle in birth, reproduction, and death. In conclusion, the discussion emphasizes the traditional importance of touch and physical participation to people's feeling for reality. New digital forms of relations disturb this feel, with significant consequences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信