早期乳腺癌患者在保乳手术后接受超高分次放射治疗的情况:一项多机构问卷调查。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s12282-024-01621-2
Haruka Uezono, Tsuyoshi Onoe, Naoto Shikama, Yuka Ono, Hidenari Hirata, Yoshinori Ito, Koichi Yasuda, Nobuki Imano, Koyo Kikuchi, Tairo Kashihara, Terufumi Kawamoto, Naoki Nakamura
{"title":"早期乳腺癌患者在保乳手术后接受超高分次放射治疗的情况:一项多机构问卷调查。","authors":"Haruka Uezono, Tsuyoshi Onoe, Naoto Shikama, Yuka Ono, Hidenari Hirata, Yoshinori Ito, Koichi Yasuda, Nobuki Imano, Koyo Kikuchi, Tairo Kashihara, Terufumi Kawamoto, Naoki Nakamura","doi":"10.1007/s12282-024-01621-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with early-stage breast cancer following breast surgery, ultra-hypofractionated (UHF) breast/chest wall radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to be non-inferior to a moderate-hypofractionated (MHF) regimen, with a minimal risk of breast induration, in the FAST-Forward trial, and UHF is now becoming the standard regimen in Europe. Herein, we aimed to investigate Japanese patients' attitudes toward the UHF regimen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire-based survey was conducted at 13 RT centers in nine prefectures across Japan. All patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, followed by either conventional fractionation (2 Gy/fr) or MHF (2.66 Gy/fr) whole-breast irradiation (WBI) with or without a tumor bed boost. The questionnaire consisted of 13 questions mainly addressing quality-of-life during RT. Key questions included an 11-point scale (0-10) for rating the patients' enthusiasm for the UHF regimen and prioritization of the following treatment-related effects: treatment efficacy, acute/late adverse effects, physical/emotional/financial burden, and breast cosmesis. The patient and treatment characteristics were assessed by a physician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 247 questionnaires were administered between November 2022 and June 2023. The age distribution was as follows: < 50:50 s:60 s: ≥ 70 = 59 (24%):76 (30%):63 (26%):49 (20%). Sixty-nine percent of patients rated their enthusiasm for the UHF regimen at ≥ 6 out of 10 points (45% rated 10/10). Treatment efficacy was the highest priority for most patients (89%), whereas breast cosmesis the lowest priority (53%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients' enthusiasm for UHF-WBI was observed across the cohort. These results could motivate researchers and clinicians to introduce UHF regimens in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uptake of ultra-hypofractionated radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery among patients with early-stage breast cancer: a multi-institutional questionnaire survey.\",\"authors\":\"Haruka Uezono, Tsuyoshi Onoe, Naoto Shikama, Yuka Ono, Hidenari Hirata, Yoshinori Ito, Koichi Yasuda, Nobuki Imano, Koyo Kikuchi, Tairo Kashihara, Terufumi Kawamoto, Naoki Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12282-024-01621-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with early-stage breast cancer following breast surgery, ultra-hypofractionated (UHF) breast/chest wall radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to be non-inferior to a moderate-hypofractionated (MHF) regimen, with a minimal risk of breast induration, in the FAST-Forward trial, and UHF is now becoming the standard regimen in Europe. Herein, we aimed to investigate Japanese patients' attitudes toward the UHF regimen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire-based survey was conducted at 13 RT centers in nine prefectures across Japan. All patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, followed by either conventional fractionation (2 Gy/fr) or MHF (2.66 Gy/fr) whole-breast irradiation (WBI) with or without a tumor bed boost. The questionnaire consisted of 13 questions mainly addressing quality-of-life during RT. Key questions included an 11-point scale (0-10) for rating the patients' enthusiasm for the UHF regimen and prioritization of the following treatment-related effects: treatment efficacy, acute/late adverse effects, physical/emotional/financial burden, and breast cosmesis. The patient and treatment characteristics were assessed by a physician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 247 questionnaires were administered between November 2022 and June 2023. The age distribution was as follows: < 50:50 s:60 s: ≥ 70 = 59 (24%):76 (30%):63 (26%):49 (20%). Sixty-nine percent of patients rated their enthusiasm for the UHF regimen at ≥ 6 out of 10 points (45% rated 10/10). Treatment efficacy was the highest priority for most patients (89%), whereas breast cosmesis the lowest priority (53%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients' enthusiasm for UHF-WBI was observed across the cohort. These results could motivate researchers and clinicians to introduce UHF regimens in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-024-01621-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-024-01621-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在FAST-Forward试验中,对于乳腺手术后的早期乳腺癌患者,超高分次(UHF)乳腺/胸壁放射治疗(RT)已被证明不劣于中度超高分次(MHF)方案,且乳腺压痕风险极低,目前超高分次已成为欧洲的标准方案。在此,我们旨在调查日本患者对超高频方案的态度:方法:我们在日本九个都道府县的 13 个 RT 中心进行了问卷调查。所有患者均接受了保乳手术,随后接受了常规分次(2 Gy/fr)或MHF(2.66 Gy/fr)全乳照射(WBI),并接受或不接受肿瘤床增量。问卷由 13 个问题组成,主要涉及 RT 期间的生活质量。关键问题包括用 11 分制(0-10 分)对患者对超高频治疗方案的热情进行评分,并对以下治疗相关影响进行优先排序:疗效、急性/晚期不良反应、身体/情感/经济负担和乳房外观。患者和治疗特点由一名医生进行评估:2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 6 月期间,共发放了 247 份调查问卷。年龄分布如下:结论患者对超高频腹腔穿刺术的热情在整个队列中均可观察到。这些结果可以激励研究人员和临床医生在临床实践中引入超高频治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Uptake of ultra-hypofractionated radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery among patients with early-stage breast cancer: a multi-institutional questionnaire survey.

Uptake of ultra-hypofractionated radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery among patients with early-stage breast cancer: a multi-institutional questionnaire survey.

Background: In patients with early-stage breast cancer following breast surgery, ultra-hypofractionated (UHF) breast/chest wall radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to be non-inferior to a moderate-hypofractionated (MHF) regimen, with a minimal risk of breast induration, in the FAST-Forward trial, and UHF is now becoming the standard regimen in Europe. Herein, we aimed to investigate Japanese patients' attitudes toward the UHF regimen.

Methods: A questionnaire-based survey was conducted at 13 RT centers in nine prefectures across Japan. All patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, followed by either conventional fractionation (2 Gy/fr) or MHF (2.66 Gy/fr) whole-breast irradiation (WBI) with or without a tumor bed boost. The questionnaire consisted of 13 questions mainly addressing quality-of-life during RT. Key questions included an 11-point scale (0-10) for rating the patients' enthusiasm for the UHF regimen and prioritization of the following treatment-related effects: treatment efficacy, acute/late adverse effects, physical/emotional/financial burden, and breast cosmesis. The patient and treatment characteristics were assessed by a physician.

Results: In total, 247 questionnaires were administered between November 2022 and June 2023. The age distribution was as follows: < 50:50 s:60 s: ≥ 70 = 59 (24%):76 (30%):63 (26%):49 (20%). Sixty-nine percent of patients rated their enthusiasm for the UHF regimen at ≥ 6 out of 10 points (45% rated 10/10). Treatment efficacy was the highest priority for most patients (89%), whereas breast cosmesis the lowest priority (53%).

Conclusions: Patients' enthusiasm for UHF-WBI was observed across the cohort. These results could motivate researchers and clinicians to introduce UHF regimens in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer, the official journal of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, publishes articles that contribute to progress in the field, in basic or translational research and also in clinical research, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with breast cancer. The journal welcomes all original articles describing clinical and epidemiological studies and laboratory investigations regarding breast cancer and related diseases. The journal will consider five types of articles: editorials, review articles, original articles, case reports, and rapid communications. Although editorials and review articles will principally be solicited by the editors, they can also be submitted for peer review, as in the case of original articles. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on breast cancer, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信