拒绝 "实践准备神话":反问系统是否为护理专业毕业生做好了准备。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Beth Ann Swan PhD, RN, FAAN, ANEF , Kim Dupree Jones PhD, FNP, FAAN , Rose Hayes RN, BSN, MA , Lalita Kaligotla Ed.D., MA, MBA , Carrie McDermott PhD, RN, APRN, ACNS-BC , Jeannie Rodriguez PhD, RN, PNP/PC , Linda McCauley PhD, RN, FAAN, FRCN
{"title":"拒绝 \"实践准备神话\":反问系统是否为护理专业毕业生做好了准备。","authors":"Beth Ann Swan PhD, RN, FAAN, ANEF ,&nbsp;Kim Dupree Jones PhD, FNP, FAAN ,&nbsp;Rose Hayes RN, BSN, MA ,&nbsp;Lalita Kaligotla Ed.D., MA, MBA ,&nbsp;Carrie McDermott PhD, RN, APRN, ACNS-BC ,&nbsp;Jeannie Rodriguez PhD, RN, PNP/PC ,&nbsp;Linda McCauley PhD, RN, FAAN, FRCN","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The nursing profession is engaged in robust national dialogue on how to implement competency-based education. This dialogue often conflates the concept of “competency-based education” with nursing “competence” or “practice readiness.” Our aim is to discuss the potential harms of conflating “competency-based education” with “competence” or “practice readiness.” This commentary explores the possible risks of issue conflation. Risks include (a) suggesting that nurses who have successfully obtained licensure are not “competent” or “ready to practice,” and (b) de-emphasizing the importance of safe and sustainable work environments for new graduate nurses. We discuss the need to separate conversations about “competency-based education” and “practice readiness”; the need to increase the clarity and specificity of discourse surrounding competency-based education; and the need for strategic alignment across academia and practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":"72 5","pages":"Article 102181"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reject the “Practice Readiness Myth”: Ask if systems are ready for nursing graduates instead\",\"authors\":\"Beth Ann Swan PhD, RN, FAAN, ANEF ,&nbsp;Kim Dupree Jones PhD, FNP, FAAN ,&nbsp;Rose Hayes RN, BSN, MA ,&nbsp;Lalita Kaligotla Ed.D., MA, MBA ,&nbsp;Carrie McDermott PhD, RN, APRN, ACNS-BC ,&nbsp;Jeannie Rodriguez PhD, RN, PNP/PC ,&nbsp;Linda McCauley PhD, RN, FAAN, FRCN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The nursing profession is engaged in robust national dialogue on how to implement competency-based education. This dialogue often conflates the concept of “competency-based education” with nursing “competence” or “practice readiness.” Our aim is to discuss the potential harms of conflating “competency-based education” with “competence” or “practice readiness.” This commentary explores the possible risks of issue conflation. Risks include (a) suggesting that nurses who have successfully obtained licensure are not “competent” or “ready to practice,” and (b) de-emphasizing the importance of safe and sustainable work environments for new graduate nurses. We discuss the need to separate conversations about “competency-based education” and “practice readiness”; the need to increase the clarity and specificity of discourse surrounding competency-based education; and the need for strategic alignment across academia and practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"volume\":\"72 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424000745\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424000745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

护理专业就如何实施能力本位教育展开了激烈的全国性对话。这种对话经常将 "能力本位教育 "的概念与护理 "能力 "或 "实践准备 "混为一谈。我们的目的是讨论将 "能力本位教育 "与 "能力 "或 "实践准备 "混为一谈的潜在危害。本评论探讨了混淆问题可能带来的风险。风险包括:(a)暗示已成功获得执业资格的护士并非 "胜任 "或 "做好执业准备";(b)不再强调安全和可持续的工作环境对新毕业护士的重要性。我们讨论了将 "基于能力的教育 "和 "实践准备 "的对话分开的必要性;提高围绕基于能力的教育的讨论的清晰度和具体性的必要性;以及在学术界和实践中进行战略调整的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reject the “Practice Readiness Myth”: Ask if systems are ready for nursing graduates instead

The nursing profession is engaged in robust national dialogue on how to implement competency-based education. This dialogue often conflates the concept of “competency-based education” with nursing “competence” or “practice readiness.” Our aim is to discuss the potential harms of conflating “competency-based education” with “competence” or “practice readiness.” This commentary explores the possible risks of issue conflation. Risks include (a) suggesting that nurses who have successfully obtained licensure are not “competent” or “ready to practice,” and (b) de-emphasizing the importance of safe and sustainable work environments for new graduate nurses. We discuss the need to separate conversations about “competency-based education” and “practice readiness”; the need to increase the clarity and specificity of discourse surrounding competency-based education; and the need for strategic alignment across academia and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Outlook
Nursing Outlook 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信