在接受公共资助的家庭和社区服务的受助者中衡量消费者反映的生活质量:对健康公平的影响》。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Tetyana P Shippee, Yinfei Duan, Zachary G Baker, Romil Parikh, Taylor Bucy, Eric Jutkowitz
{"title":"在接受公共资助的家庭和社区服务的受助者中衡量消费者反映的生活质量:对健康公平的影响》。","authors":"Tetyana P Shippee, Yinfei Duan, Zachary G Baker, Romil Parikh, Taylor Bucy, Eric Jutkowitz","doi":"10.1177/08982643241267378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite an increased policy focused on home- and community-based services (HCBS), little is known about their quality of life (QoL)-a key measure of person-centered care. This paper addresses this gap by measuring consumers' self-reported QoL and identifying factors associated with disparities in QoL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the 2015-2016 National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability survey for 3426 respondents in Minnesota, using factor analyses to identify latent QoL domains. Multivariable regression models identified predictors of QoL domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factor analyses identified three valid and reliable latent QoL domains: security, self-determination, and care experiences. Younger consumers with disabilities (versus consumers ≥65 years of age), minoritized racial/ethnic groups, consumers with hearing loss, without a spouse/domestic partner, and not living in consumer's own/family home reported significantly lower QoL in various domains (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Disparities in HCBS consumer-reported QoL exist, necessitating equitable reforms to improve HCBS quality for its increasingly diversified consumer base.</p>","PeriodicalId":51385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Health","volume":" ","pages":"8982643241267378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Consumer-Reported Quality of Life Among Recipients of Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services: Implications for Health Equity.\",\"authors\":\"Tetyana P Shippee, Yinfei Duan, Zachary G Baker, Romil Parikh, Taylor Bucy, Eric Jutkowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08982643241267378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite an increased policy focused on home- and community-based services (HCBS), little is known about their quality of life (QoL)-a key measure of person-centered care. This paper addresses this gap by measuring consumers' self-reported QoL and identifying factors associated with disparities in QoL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the 2015-2016 National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability survey for 3426 respondents in Minnesota, using factor analyses to identify latent QoL domains. Multivariable regression models identified predictors of QoL domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factor analyses identified three valid and reliable latent QoL domains: security, self-determination, and care experiences. Younger consumers with disabilities (versus consumers ≥65 years of age), minoritized racial/ethnic groups, consumers with hearing loss, without a spouse/domestic partner, and not living in consumer's own/family home reported significantly lower QoL in various domains (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Disparities in HCBS consumer-reported QoL exist, necessitating equitable reforms to improve HCBS quality for its increasingly diversified consumer base.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8982643241267378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643241267378\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643241267378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:尽管政策越来越关注家庭和社区服务(HCBS),但人们对其生活质量(QoL)却知之甚少,而生活质量是衡量以人为本的护理的关键指标。本文通过测量消费者自我报告的 QoL 并确定与 QoL 差异相关的因素来弥补这一不足:我们对明尼苏达州 3426 名受访者的 2015-2016 年国家核心指标--老龄和残疾调查进行了分析,利用因子分析确定了潜在的 QoL 领域。多变量回归模型确定了 QoL 领域的预测因素:因子分析确定了三个有效可靠的潜在 QoL 领域:安全感、自我决定和护理体验。年龄较小的残疾消费者(相对于年龄≥65 岁的消费者)、少数种族/民族群体、听力受损的消费者、没有配偶/家庭伴侣的消费者以及不住在消费者自己/家人家中的消费者在各个领域的 QoL 都明显较低(p < .001):讨论:高龄社区保健服务(HCBS)消费者报告的 QoL 存在差异,因此有必要进行公平改革,以提高高龄社区保健服务(HCBS)的质量,满足日益多样化的消费者群体的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Consumer-Reported Quality of Life Among Recipients of Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Services: Implications for Health Equity.

Objectives: Despite an increased policy focused on home- and community-based services (HCBS), little is known about their quality of life (QoL)-a key measure of person-centered care. This paper addresses this gap by measuring consumers' self-reported QoL and identifying factors associated with disparities in QoL.

Methods: We analyzed the 2015-2016 National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability survey for 3426 respondents in Minnesota, using factor analyses to identify latent QoL domains. Multivariable regression models identified predictors of QoL domains.

Results: Factor analyses identified three valid and reliable latent QoL domains: security, self-determination, and care experiences. Younger consumers with disabilities (versus consumers ≥65 years of age), minoritized racial/ethnic groups, consumers with hearing loss, without a spouse/domestic partner, and not living in consumer's own/family home reported significantly lower QoL in various domains (p < .001).

Discussion: Disparities in HCBS consumer-reported QoL exist, necessitating equitable reforms to improve HCBS quality for its increasingly diversified consumer base.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Health is an interdisciplinary forum for the presentation of research findings and scholarly exchange in the area of aging and health. Manuscripts are sought that deal with social and behavioral factors related to health and aging. Disciplines represented include the behavioral and social sciences, public health, epidemiology, demography, health services research, nursing, social work, medicine, and related disciplines. Although preference is given to manuscripts presenting the findings of original research, review and methodological pieces will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信