亮度对口内扫描精确度和准确性的影响:体外对比研究

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
S W A Viana, M A Ribeiro, A E M de Oliveira, B S Sotto-Maior
{"title":"亮度对口内扫描精确度和准确性的影响:体外对比研究","authors":"S W A Viana, M A Ribeiro, A E M de Oliveira, B S Sotto-Maior","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2660Viana09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This in vitro study focused on verifying the influence of different ambient light conditions on the accuracy and precision of models obtained from digital scans.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>To measure the tested illuminances: chair light/reflector; room light, and natural light at the time of scanning, a luxmeter was used. From the STL file, nine experimental groups were formed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the nine specific combinations between the three IOS and the three types of lighting, it was verified that for all of them, as well as the ICC, the accuracy was also excellent, in which the measured values were not significantly influenced by the IOS brand (p = 0.994) nor by the type of lighting (p = 0.996). For precision data, GLM indicated a statistically significant interaction between IOS and lighting type. Under LS, accuracy was significantly higher with 3Shape® than with CS 3600 CareStream®, which had significantly higher accuracy than Virtuo Vivo™ Straumann®.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The models obtained with the three IOS evaluated exhibited excellent accuracy under the different illuminance tested and the 3Shape® under the three illuminance conditions was the device that presented the best precision, specifically when using LC and LS.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"326-334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Luminosity on the Precision and Accuracy of Intraoral Scanning: A Comparative in vitro Study.\",\"authors\":\"S W A Viana, M A Ribeiro, A E M de Oliveira, B S Sotto-Maior\",\"doi\":\"10.1922/EJPRD_2660Viana09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This in vitro study focused on verifying the influence of different ambient light conditions on the accuracy and precision of models obtained from digital scans.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>To measure the tested illuminances: chair light/reflector; room light, and natural light at the time of scanning, a luxmeter was used. From the STL file, nine experimental groups were formed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the nine specific combinations between the three IOS and the three types of lighting, it was verified that for all of them, as well as the ICC, the accuracy was also excellent, in which the measured values were not significantly influenced by the IOS brand (p = 0.994) nor by the type of lighting (p = 0.996). For precision data, GLM indicated a statistically significant interaction between IOS and lighting type. Under LS, accuracy was significantly higher with 3Shape® than with CS 3600 CareStream®, which had significantly higher accuracy than Virtuo Vivo™ Straumann®.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The models obtained with the three IOS evaluated exhibited excellent accuracy under the different illuminance tested and the 3Shape® under the three illuminance conditions was the device that presented the best precision, specifically when using LC and LS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"326-334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2660Viana09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2660Viana09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项体外研究的重点是验证不同的环境光线条件对数字扫描获得的模型的准确性和精确度的影响:这项体外研究的重点是验证不同环境光线条件对通过数字扫描获得的模型的准确性和精确度的影响:使用照度计测量测试的照度:椅子光/反射器、室内光和扫描时的自然光。根据 STL 文件,组成了九个实验组:在三种 IOS 和三种照明之间的九种特定组合中,经证实,所有组合以及 ICC 的精确度都非常高,测量值不受 IOS 品牌(p = 0.994)和照明类型(p = 0.996)的显著影响。对于精确度数据,GLM 表明 IOS 和照明类型之间存在统计学意义上的交互作用。在 LS 条件下,3Shape® 的精确度明显高于 CS 3600 CareStream®,而 CS 3600 CareStream® 的精确度明显高于 Virtuo Vivo™ Straumann®:结论:使用三种 IOS 评估得到的模型在测试的不同光照条件下均表现出极佳的准确性,3Shape® 在三种光照条件下是精度最高的设备,特别是在使用 LC 和 LS 时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Luminosity on the Precision and Accuracy of Intraoral Scanning: A Comparative in vitro Study.

Objectives: This in vitro study focused on verifying the influence of different ambient light conditions on the accuracy and precision of models obtained from digital scans.

Methodology: To measure the tested illuminances: chair light/reflector; room light, and natural light at the time of scanning, a luxmeter was used. From the STL file, nine experimental groups were formed.

Results: Of the nine specific combinations between the three IOS and the three types of lighting, it was verified that for all of them, as well as the ICC, the accuracy was also excellent, in which the measured values were not significantly influenced by the IOS brand (p = 0.994) nor by the type of lighting (p = 0.996). For precision data, GLM indicated a statistically significant interaction between IOS and lighting type. Under LS, accuracy was significantly higher with 3Shape® than with CS 3600 CareStream®, which had significantly higher accuracy than Virtuo Vivo™ Straumann®.

Conclusions: The models obtained with the three IOS evaluated exhibited excellent accuracy under the different illuminance tested and the 3Shape® under the three illuminance conditions was the device that presented the best precision, specifically when using LC and LS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信