逻辑中的 I

IF 0.6 3区哲学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY

THEORIA Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1111/theo.12543

Gillian Russell

{"title":"逻辑中的 I","authors":"Gillian Russell","doi":"10.1111/theo.12543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues for the significance of Kaplan's logic LD in two ways: first, by looking at how logic got along before we had LD, and second, by using it to bring out the similarity between David Hume's thesis that one cannot deduce claims about the future on the basis of premises only about the past, and the so‐called \"essentiality\" of the indexical.","PeriodicalId":44638,"journal":{"name":"THEORIA","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The I in logic\",\"authors\":\"Gillian Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/theo.12543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues for the significance of Kaplan's logic LD in two ways: first, by looking at how logic got along before we had LD, and second, by using it to bring out the similarity between David Hume's thesis that one cannot deduce claims about the future on the basis of premises only about the past, and the so‐called \\\"essentiality\\\" of the indexical.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEORIA\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEORIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12543\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEORIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从两个方面论证了卡普兰逻辑学 LD 的意义：首先，通过观察在我们有 LD 之前逻辑学是如何发展的；其次，通过使用 LD 来揭示大卫-休谟（David Hume）的论点（即人们不能仅根据关于过去的前提来推导关于未来的主张）与所谓索引的 "本质 "之间的相似性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The I in logic

This paper argues for the significance of Kaplan's logic LD in two ways: first, by looking at how logic got along before we had LD, and second, by using it to bring out the similarity between David Hume's thesis that one cannot deduce claims about the future on the basis of premises only about the past, and the so‐called "essentiality" of the indexical.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

THEORIA SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： Since its foundation in 1935, Theoria publishes research in all areas of philosophy. Theoria is committed to precision and clarity in philosophical discussions, and encourages cooperation between philosophy and other disciplines. The journal is not affiliated with any particular school or faction. Instead, it promotes dialogues between different philosophical viewpoints. Theoria is peer-reviewed. It publishes articles, reviews, and shorter notes and discussions. Short discussion notes on recent articles in Theoria are welcome.