使用第四版脊髓独立性测量法评估能力实现情况。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vadim Bluvshtein, Amiram Catz, Yoav Benjamini, David Refaeli, Lilach Front, Dianne Michaeli, Emiliana Bizzarini, Paulo Margalho, Thabata Pasquini Soeira, Nur Kesiktas, Elena Aidinoff
{"title":"使用第四版脊髓独立性测量法评估能力实现情况。","authors":"Vadim Bluvshtein, Amiram Catz, Yoav Benjamini, David Refaeli, Lilach Front, Dianne Michaeli, Emiliana Bizzarini, Paulo Margalho, Thabata Pasquini Soeira, Nur Kesiktas, Elena Aidinoff","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2374132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Change in ability realization reflects the main contribution of rehabilitation to improvement in the performance of daily activities after spinal cord lesions (SCL).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To adapt a Spinal Cord Ability Realization Measurement Index (SCI-ARMI) formula to the new Spinal Cord Independence Measure version 4 (SCIM4).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from 156 individuals for whom American Spinal Injury Association Motor Score (AMS) and SCIM4 scores were collected, we obtained an estimate for the highest possible SCIM4 given the patient's AMS value, using the 95th percentile of SCIM4 values at discharge from rehabilitation (SCIM95) for patients with any given AMS at discharge. We used the statistical software environment R to implement the quantile regression method for linear and quadratic formulas. We also compared the computed model with the SCIM95 model obtained using data from the present study group, positioned in the SCIM95 formula developed for SCIM3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The coefficients of the computed SCIM95 formula based on SCIM4 scores were statistically non-significant, which hypothetically reflects the small sample relative to the goal of estimating SCIM4 95th percentile. Predicting the ability using SCIM4 scores positioned in the SCIM95 formula used for SCIM3, however, yielded SCIM95 values, which are very close to those of the new SCIM95 formula (Mean difference 2.16, 95% CI = 1.45, 4.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SCI-ARMI formula, which is based on the SCIM95 formula developed for SCIM3, is appropriate for estimating SCI-ARMI at present, when SCIM4 scores are available. When sufficient additional data accumulates, it will be appropriate to introduce a modified SCI-ARMI formula.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of ability realization using the 4th version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure.\",\"authors\":\"Vadim Bluvshtein, Amiram Catz, Yoav Benjamini, David Refaeli, Lilach Front, Dianne Michaeli, Emiliana Bizzarini, Paulo Margalho, Thabata Pasquini Soeira, Nur Kesiktas, Elena Aidinoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2374132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Change in ability realization reflects the main contribution of rehabilitation to improvement in the performance of daily activities after spinal cord lesions (SCL).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To adapt a Spinal Cord Ability Realization Measurement Index (SCI-ARMI) formula to the new Spinal Cord Independence Measure version 4 (SCIM4).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from 156 individuals for whom American Spinal Injury Association Motor Score (AMS) and SCIM4 scores were collected, we obtained an estimate for the highest possible SCIM4 given the patient's AMS value, using the 95th percentile of SCIM4 values at discharge from rehabilitation (SCIM95) for patients with any given AMS at discharge. We used the statistical software environment R to implement the quantile regression method for linear and quadratic formulas. We also compared the computed model with the SCIM95 model obtained using data from the present study group, positioned in the SCIM95 formula developed for SCIM3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The coefficients of the computed SCIM95 formula based on SCIM4 scores were statistically non-significant, which hypothetically reflects the small sample relative to the goal of estimating SCIM4 95th percentile. Predicting the ability using SCIM4 scores positioned in the SCIM95 formula used for SCIM3, however, yielded SCIM95 values, which are very close to those of the new SCIM95 formula (Mean difference 2.16, 95% CI = 1.45, 4.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SCI-ARMI formula, which is based on the SCIM95 formula developed for SCIM3, is appropriate for estimating SCI-ARMI at present, when SCIM4 scores are available. When sufficient additional data accumulates, it will be appropriate to introduce a modified SCI-ARMI formula.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2374132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2374132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:能力实现的变化反映了脊髓损伤(SCL)后康复对改善日常活动能力的主要贡献:将脊髓能力实现测量指数(SCI-ARMI)公式调整为新的脊髓独立性测量第4版(SCIM4):我们利用收集到的美国脊髓损伤协会运动评分(AMS)和 SCIM4 评分的 156 名患者的数据,根据患者的 AMS 值,利用出院时任何给定 AMS 的患者出院时 SCIM4 值的第 95 百分位数(SCIM95),估算出可能的最高 SCIM4 值。我们使用 R 统计软件环境来实现线性和二次公式的量化回归方法。我们还将计算出的模型与使用本研究组数据获得的 SCIM95 模型进行了比较,后者定位在为 SCIM3 开发的 SCIM95 公式中:结果:根据 SCIM4 分数计算出的 SCIM95 公式的系数在统计上并不显著,这可能反映了相对于估计 SCIM4 第 95 百分位数的目标而言,样本较小。然而,使用 SCIM3 的 SCIM95 公式中的 SCIM4 分数进行能力预测,得出的 SCIM95 值与新 SCIM95 公式的 SCIM95 值非常接近(平均差 2.16,95% CI = 1.45,4.90):结论:SCI-ARMI 计算公式基于为 SCIM3 开发的 SCIM95 计算公式,在目前 SCIM4 评分可用的情况下,适合估算 SCI-ARMI。当积累了足够多的额外数据后,引入修改后的 SCI-ARMI 公式将是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of ability realization using the 4th version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure.

Context: Change in ability realization reflects the main contribution of rehabilitation to improvement in the performance of daily activities after spinal cord lesions (SCL).

Objective: To adapt a Spinal Cord Ability Realization Measurement Index (SCI-ARMI) formula to the new Spinal Cord Independence Measure version 4 (SCIM4).

Methods: Using data from 156 individuals for whom American Spinal Injury Association Motor Score (AMS) and SCIM4 scores were collected, we obtained an estimate for the highest possible SCIM4 given the patient's AMS value, using the 95th percentile of SCIM4 values at discharge from rehabilitation (SCIM95) for patients with any given AMS at discharge. We used the statistical software environment R to implement the quantile regression method for linear and quadratic formulas. We also compared the computed model with the SCIM95 model obtained using data from the present study group, positioned in the SCIM95 formula developed for SCIM3.

Results: The coefficients of the computed SCIM95 formula based on SCIM4 scores were statistically non-significant, which hypothetically reflects the small sample relative to the goal of estimating SCIM4 95th percentile. Predicting the ability using SCIM4 scores positioned in the SCIM95 formula used for SCIM3, however, yielded SCIM95 values, which are very close to those of the new SCIM95 formula (Mean difference 2.16, 95% CI = 1.45, 4.90).

Conclusion: The SCI-ARMI formula, which is based on the SCIM95 formula developed for SCIM3, is appropriate for estimating SCI-ARMI at present, when SCIM4 scores are available. When sufficient additional data accumulates, it will be appropriate to introduce a modified SCI-ARMI formula.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信