使用树脂和生物陶瓷封闭剂进行根管封闭对加固根管治疗牙齿的影响。

Ahmed Ali Youssef, Essam Fawzy Mahmoud
{"title":"使用树脂和生物陶瓷封闭剂进行根管封闭对加固根管治疗牙齿的影响。","authors":"Ahmed Ali Youssef, Essam Fawzy Mahmoud","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.286438.3030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Comparing the fracture resistance of roots obturated with gutta-percha using two different sealers. Materials and methods: Forty human single rooted mandibular premolars teeth were decoronated and standardized to 16 mm length. Instrumentation was done using PLEX-V system rotary file system up to PLEX-V 40.04. Samples were randomly classified into two equal experimental groups according to the type of sealer used for obturation of root canals (Adseal and Ceraseal). The roots were aligned vertically along their long axis in self-curing acrylic blocks and mounted on the universal testing machine to measure the fracture resistance. Data collected and statistically analyzed. Results: The fracture resistance values of Adseal group were higher than Ceraseal group. A statistically significant difference was found between Adseal group (I) and Ceraseal group (II) where (p<0.001). Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that the obturation using Adseal resin sealer combined with gutta percha points significantly increases the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth compared to Ceraseal bioceramic sealer combined with gutta percha points.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of root canal obturation using resin and bio-ceramic sealers on reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Ali Youssef, Essam Fawzy Mahmoud\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/edj.2024.286438.3030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Comparing the fracture resistance of roots obturated with gutta-percha using two different sealers. Materials and methods: Forty human single rooted mandibular premolars teeth were decoronated and standardized to 16 mm length. Instrumentation was done using PLEX-V system rotary file system up to PLEX-V 40.04. Samples were randomly classified into two equal experimental groups according to the type of sealer used for obturation of root canals (Adseal and Ceraseal). The roots were aligned vertically along their long axis in self-curing acrylic blocks and mounted on the universal testing machine to measure the fracture resistance. Data collected and statistically analyzed. Results: The fracture resistance values of Adseal group were higher than Ceraseal group. A statistically significant difference was found between Adseal group (I) and Ceraseal group (II) where (p<0.001). Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that the obturation using Adseal resin sealer combined with gutta percha points significantly increases the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth compared to Ceraseal bioceramic sealer combined with gutta percha points.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.286438.3030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.286438.3030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较使用两种不同封闭剂封闭的牙根的抗折断性。材料和方法:对 40 颗人类单根下颌前臼齿进行装饰并标准化为 16 毫米长。使用 PLEX-V 系统旋转锉系统(最高可达 PLEX-V 40.04)进行器械操作。根据根管封闭剂的类型(Adseal 和 Ceraseal),样本被随机分为两个相同的实验组。将牙根沿其长轴垂直排列在自固化丙烯酸块中,并安装在万能试验机上测量抗折性。收集数据并进行统计分析。结果:Adseal 组的抗折强度值高于 Ceraseal 组。Adseal 组(I)和 Ceraseal 组(II)之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论在本研究的局限性范围内,可以得出结论:与 Ceraseal 生物陶瓷封闭剂和古塔胶点相比,使用 Adseal 树脂封闭剂和古塔胶点进行封闭能显著提高牙髓治疗牙齿的抗折性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of root canal obturation using resin and bio-ceramic sealers on reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth.
Aim: Comparing the fracture resistance of roots obturated with gutta-percha using two different sealers. Materials and methods: Forty human single rooted mandibular premolars teeth were decoronated and standardized to 16 mm length. Instrumentation was done using PLEX-V system rotary file system up to PLEX-V 40.04. Samples were randomly classified into two equal experimental groups according to the type of sealer used for obturation of root canals (Adseal and Ceraseal). The roots were aligned vertically along their long axis in self-curing acrylic blocks and mounted on the universal testing machine to measure the fracture resistance. Data collected and statistically analyzed. Results: The fracture resistance values of Adseal group were higher than Ceraseal group. A statistically significant difference was found between Adseal group (I) and Ceraseal group (II) where (p<0.001). Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that the obturation using Adseal resin sealer combined with gutta percha points significantly increases the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth compared to Ceraseal bioceramic sealer combined with gutta percha points.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信