牙周炎的激光手术与非激光手术:比较研究

IF 0.8 Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Reema M. Rao, Shovan Roy, Arnab Mondal, Jignesh Tate, K. Bharath, Siva Kumar Pendyala, P. Pandey, H. D. Tiwari
{"title":"牙周炎的激光手术与非激光手术:比较研究","authors":"Reema M. Rao, Shovan Roy, Arnab Mondal, Jignesh Tate, K. Bharath, Siva Kumar Pendyala, P. Pandey, H. D. Tiwari","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_394_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n The purpose of this research is to estimate the effectiveness of non-laser surgery and laser surgery in the management of periodontitis.\n \n \n \n One hundred participants with a chronic periodontitis diagnosis participated in a randomized controlled experiment. Two cohorts of patients were created: Cohort B underwent non-laser surgery and Cohort A underwent laser surgery. Pre- and postoperative assessments were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months for clinical criteria such as “pocket depth (PD), gingival index (GI), and clinical attachment level (CAL)”.\n \n \n \n There was a noticeable improvement in clinical parameters following both laser and non-laser operations. However, laser surgery showed superior results in terms of decreased PD and raised CAL.\n \n \n \n In conclusion, compared to non-laser surgery, laser surgery seems to be a more successful treatment option for periodontitis. Larger sample sizes and longstanding follow-up are required for future research in order to validate these results and evaluate the longstanding sustainability of the treatment effects.\n","PeriodicalId":16824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","volume":"5 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laser Surgery versus Non-laser Surgery in Periodontitis: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Reema M. Rao, Shovan Roy, Arnab Mondal, Jignesh Tate, K. Bharath, Siva Kumar Pendyala, P. Pandey, H. D. Tiwari\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_394_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n \\n \\n \\n The purpose of this research is to estimate the effectiveness of non-laser surgery and laser surgery in the management of periodontitis.\\n \\n \\n \\n One hundred participants with a chronic periodontitis diagnosis participated in a randomized controlled experiment. Two cohorts of patients were created: Cohort B underwent non-laser surgery and Cohort A underwent laser surgery. Pre- and postoperative assessments were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months for clinical criteria such as “pocket depth (PD), gingival index (GI), and clinical attachment level (CAL)”.\\n \\n \\n \\n There was a noticeable improvement in clinical parameters following both laser and non-laser operations. However, laser surgery showed superior results in terms of decreased PD and raised CAL.\\n \\n \\n \\n In conclusion, compared to non-laser surgery, laser surgery seems to be a more successful treatment option for periodontitis. Larger sample sizes and longstanding follow-up are required for future research in order to validate these results and evaluate the longstanding sustainability of the treatment effects.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"5 26\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_394_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_394_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 本研究的目的是评估非激光手术和激光手术治疗牙周炎的效果。 100 名确诊为慢性牙周炎的患者参加了随机对照实验。实验共分为两组:B 组接受非激光手术,A 组接受激光手术。术前和术后 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月对 "牙周袋深度(PD)、牙龈指数(GI)和临床附着水平(CAL)"等临床标准进行评估。 激光和非激光手术后,临床参数都有明显改善。不过,激光手术在降低 PD 和提高 CAL 方面显示出更优越的效果。 总之,与非激光手术相比,激光手术似乎是治疗牙周炎更成功的方法。未来的研究需要更大的样本量和长期的随访,以验证这些结果,并评估治疗效果的长期可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laser Surgery versus Non-laser Surgery in Periodontitis: A Comparative Study
ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to estimate the effectiveness of non-laser surgery and laser surgery in the management of periodontitis. One hundred participants with a chronic periodontitis diagnosis participated in a randomized controlled experiment. Two cohorts of patients were created: Cohort B underwent non-laser surgery and Cohort A underwent laser surgery. Pre- and postoperative assessments were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months for clinical criteria such as “pocket depth (PD), gingival index (GI), and clinical attachment level (CAL)”. There was a noticeable improvement in clinical parameters following both laser and non-laser operations. However, laser surgery showed superior results in terms of decreased PD and raised CAL. In conclusion, compared to non-laser surgery, laser surgery seems to be a more successful treatment option for periodontitis. Larger sample sizes and longstanding follow-up are required for future research in order to validate these results and evaluate the longstanding sustainability of the treatment effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is a Quarterly multidisciplinary open access biomedical journal. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is an international medium of interaction between scientist, academicians and industrial personnel’s.JPBS is now offial publication of OPUBS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信