可重复使用的柔性输尿管镜的成本效益:机构审计

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Pranalee G. Khedekar, S. Viswaroop, M. Arul, Ganesh Gopalakrishnan, S. V. Kandasami
{"title":"可重复使用的柔性输尿管镜的成本效益:机构审计","authors":"Pranalee G. Khedekar, S. Viswaroop, M. Arul, Ganesh Gopalakrishnan, S. V. Kandasami","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_41_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n A flexible ureteroscope (FU) is an important tool in the urologist’s armamentarium. This study aims to check the durability and cost-effectiveness of conventional FU.\n \n \n \n The institution registry of damaged FU over the last 7 years was reviewed. A total of 17 flexible scopes were used. The data of 13 scopes (11 Storz fiberoptic and 2 Seesheen digital) are included in this study. A total of 1905 cases were performed. The cost of scope, duration of use, number of cases done by each scope, and nature of damage were evaluated. We compared the cost-effectiveness of conventional scopes with published costs on disposable scopes.\n \n \n \n The mean number of cases done by fiberoptic scope was 159 (range 25–334). The total cases done by 2 digital scopes were 135 and 25. The mean life of fiberoptic and digital scopes was 17 (range 4–31) and 8 months, respectively. The mean cost of fiberoptic scope was Indian Rupee (INR) 338,951 ($4082.7221) and INR 525,000 ($6323.7138) for digital scope. The cost per case for reusable scope is calculated by dividing the mean cost of FU by the mean number of cases done. The reprocessing cost of INR 527 was then added. Thus, the average cost per procedure for fiberoptic and digital FU was INR 2658.76 and INR 7089.50, respectively. We compared this cost with a projected cost of disposable FUbased on today’s market data, which ranged from INR 60,000 to 107,427.\n \n \n \n The reusable scopes are durable, cost-effective, and an excellent option for high case-load institutions.\n","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cost-effectiveness of reusable flexible ureteroscopes: An institutional audit\",\"authors\":\"Pranalee G. Khedekar, S. Viswaroop, M. Arul, Ganesh Gopalakrishnan, S. V. Kandasami\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/iju.iju_41_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n A flexible ureteroscope (FU) is an important tool in the urologist’s armamentarium. This study aims to check the durability and cost-effectiveness of conventional FU.\\n \\n \\n \\n The institution registry of damaged FU over the last 7 years was reviewed. A total of 17 flexible scopes were used. The data of 13 scopes (11 Storz fiberoptic and 2 Seesheen digital) are included in this study. A total of 1905 cases were performed. The cost of scope, duration of use, number of cases done by each scope, and nature of damage were evaluated. We compared the cost-effectiveness of conventional scopes with published costs on disposable scopes.\\n \\n \\n \\n The mean number of cases done by fiberoptic scope was 159 (range 25–334). The total cases done by 2 digital scopes were 135 and 25. The mean life of fiberoptic and digital scopes was 17 (range 4–31) and 8 months, respectively. The mean cost of fiberoptic scope was Indian Rupee (INR) 338,951 ($4082.7221) and INR 525,000 ($6323.7138) for digital scope. The cost per case for reusable scope is calculated by dividing the mean cost of FU by the mean number of cases done. The reprocessing cost of INR 527 was then added. Thus, the average cost per procedure for fiberoptic and digital FU was INR 2658.76 and INR 7089.50, respectively. We compared this cost with a projected cost of disposable FUbased on today’s market data, which ranged from INR 60,000 to 107,427.\\n \\n \\n \\n The reusable scopes are durable, cost-effective, and an excellent option for high case-load institutions.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":47352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_41_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_41_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

柔性输尿管镜(FU)是泌尿科医生的重要工具。本研究旨在检查传统输尿管软镜的耐用性和成本效益。 研究人员查阅了该机构在过去 7 年中受损输尿管镜的登记资料。共使用了 17 个软镜。本研究纳入了 13 台镜(11 台 Storz 光纤镜和 2 台 Seesheen 数字镜)的数据。共进行了 1905 例手术。我们对手术镜的成本、使用时间、每种手术镜完成的病例数以及损伤的性质进行了评估。我们将传统显微镜的成本效益与已公布的一次性显微镜成本进行了比较。 纤维镜完成的平均病例数为 159 例(25-334 例不等)。使用两种数字显微镜完成的病例总数分别为 135 例和 25 例。纤维镜和数字镜的平均寿命分别为 17 个月(4-31 个月)和 8 个月。纤维镜的平均成本为 338,951 印度卢比(4082.7221 美元),数字镜为 525,000 印度卢比(6323.7138 美元)。可重复使用窥镜的每例成本是用 FU 的平均成本除以平均手术例数计算得出的。然后再加上 527 卢比的再处理费用。因此,光纤和数字 FU 的每次手术平均成本分别为 2658.76 印度卢比和 7089.50 印度卢比。我们将这一成本与根据当今市场数据预测的一次性 FU 成本进行了比较,后者的成本介于 60,000 至 107,427 印度卢比之间。 可重复使用的显微镜经久耐用,成本效益高,是病例量大的机构的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The cost-effectiveness of reusable flexible ureteroscopes: An institutional audit
A flexible ureteroscope (FU) is an important tool in the urologist’s armamentarium. This study aims to check the durability and cost-effectiveness of conventional FU. The institution registry of damaged FU over the last 7 years was reviewed. A total of 17 flexible scopes were used. The data of 13 scopes (11 Storz fiberoptic and 2 Seesheen digital) are included in this study. A total of 1905 cases were performed. The cost of scope, duration of use, number of cases done by each scope, and nature of damage were evaluated. We compared the cost-effectiveness of conventional scopes with published costs on disposable scopes. The mean number of cases done by fiberoptic scope was 159 (range 25–334). The total cases done by 2 digital scopes were 135 and 25. The mean life of fiberoptic and digital scopes was 17 (range 4–31) and 8 months, respectively. The mean cost of fiberoptic scope was Indian Rupee (INR) 338,951 ($4082.7221) and INR 525,000 ($6323.7138) for digital scope. The cost per case for reusable scope is calculated by dividing the mean cost of FU by the mean number of cases done. The reprocessing cost of INR 527 was then added. Thus, the average cost per procedure for fiberoptic and digital FU was INR 2658.76 and INR 7089.50, respectively. We compared this cost with a projected cost of disposable FUbased on today’s market data, which ranged from INR 60,000 to 107,427. The reusable scopes are durable, cost-effective, and an excellent option for high case-load institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Urology
Indian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Urology-IJU (ISSN 0970-1591) is official publication of the Urological Society of India. The journal is published Quarterly. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, CAB Abstracts, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Excerpta Medica / EMBASE, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Global Health, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Tropical Diseases Bulletin, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信