芬兰八家实验室的深层搅拌稳定试验-圆桶试验

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
J. Forsman, Jari Ikävalko, M. Löfman, L. Korkiala-Tanttu, Tuuli Teittinen
{"title":"芬兰八家实验室的深层搅拌稳定试验-圆桶试验","authors":"J. Forsman, Jari Ikävalko, M. Löfman, L. Korkiala-Tanttu, Tuuli Teittinen","doi":"10.1520/gtj20230377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Stabilization tests in laboratory play an essential part of quality control and assurance of the deep mixing method. By preparing and testing laboratory soil specimens stabilized with different binder types and dosages (binder recipes), estimation of in-situ properties of treated soil can be made. The stabilization tests typically consist of uniaxial compressive tests of cylindrical specimens. However, there have not been any national guidelines in Finland on laboratory methods for stabilization tests until year 2018, when an updated Finnish stabilization design guideline was published by the Finnish Transport Agency. By means of this guideline, stabilization test results from different laboratories should be comparable. To study the comparability of the stabilization tests from different laboratories, a round-robin study (interlaboratory test) between laboratories was completed. The performed stabilization test series have been examined as the internal (within laboratory) coefficient of variation of the individual test series and as the external variation of the parallel stabilization test series performed in different laboratories. The internal variation of the stabilization test series was modest in most of the laboratories, but regardless of the national stabilization test guideline, a large variation was found in the results of the parallel test series of the laboratories. Based on the findings, additions to the Finnish national guidelines are needed and these additions are planned for implementation during 2023–2024.","PeriodicalId":55099,"journal":{"name":"Geotechnical Testing Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stabilization Tests for Deep Mixing—Round-Robin Tests in Eight Finnish Laboratories\",\"authors\":\"J. Forsman, Jari Ikävalko, M. Löfman, L. Korkiala-Tanttu, Tuuli Teittinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1520/gtj20230377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Stabilization tests in laboratory play an essential part of quality control and assurance of the deep mixing method. By preparing and testing laboratory soil specimens stabilized with different binder types and dosages (binder recipes), estimation of in-situ properties of treated soil can be made. The stabilization tests typically consist of uniaxial compressive tests of cylindrical specimens. However, there have not been any national guidelines in Finland on laboratory methods for stabilization tests until year 2018, when an updated Finnish stabilization design guideline was published by the Finnish Transport Agency. By means of this guideline, stabilization test results from different laboratories should be comparable. To study the comparability of the stabilization tests from different laboratories, a round-robin study (interlaboratory test) between laboratories was completed. The performed stabilization test series have been examined as the internal (within laboratory) coefficient of variation of the individual test series and as the external variation of the parallel stabilization test series performed in different laboratories. The internal variation of the stabilization test series was modest in most of the laboratories, but regardless of the national stabilization test guideline, a large variation was found in the results of the parallel test series of the laboratories. Based on the findings, additions to the Finnish national guidelines are needed and these additions are planned for implementation during 2023–2024.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotechnical Testing Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotechnical Testing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj20230377\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotechnical Testing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj20230377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实验室稳定试验是深层搅拌法质量控制和保证的重要组成部分。通过制备和测试使用不同粘结剂类型和剂量(粘结剂配方)稳定的实验室土壤试样,可以对处理过的土壤的原位特性进行估算。稳定试验通常包括对圆柱形试样进行单轴压缩试验。然而,芬兰一直没有关于稳定化测试实验室方法的国家指南,直到 2018 年,芬兰交通局发布了最新的芬兰稳定化设计指南。通过该指南,不同实验室的稳定化测试结果应具有可比性。为了研究不同实验室稳定化测试的可比性,完成了实验室之间的循环研究(实验室间测试)。对已进行的稳定化测试系列进行了检查,以了解单个测试系列的内部(实验室内部)变异系数,以及不同实验室进行的平行稳定化测试系列的外部变异。在大多数实验室中,稳定化测试系列的内部变异不大,但无论国家稳定化测试准则如何,各实验室平行测试系列的结果差异很大。根据研究结果,需要对芬兰国家指南进行补充,计划在 2023-2024 年期间实施这些补充内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stabilization Tests for Deep Mixing—Round-Robin Tests in Eight Finnish Laboratories
Stabilization tests in laboratory play an essential part of quality control and assurance of the deep mixing method. By preparing and testing laboratory soil specimens stabilized with different binder types and dosages (binder recipes), estimation of in-situ properties of treated soil can be made. The stabilization tests typically consist of uniaxial compressive tests of cylindrical specimens. However, there have not been any national guidelines in Finland on laboratory methods for stabilization tests until year 2018, when an updated Finnish stabilization design guideline was published by the Finnish Transport Agency. By means of this guideline, stabilization test results from different laboratories should be comparable. To study the comparability of the stabilization tests from different laboratories, a round-robin study (interlaboratory test) between laboratories was completed. The performed stabilization test series have been examined as the internal (within laboratory) coefficient of variation of the individual test series and as the external variation of the parallel stabilization test series performed in different laboratories. The internal variation of the stabilization test series was modest in most of the laboratories, but regardless of the national stabilization test guideline, a large variation was found in the results of the parallel test series of the laboratories. Based on the findings, additions to the Finnish national guidelines are needed and these additions are planned for implementation during 2023–2024.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geotechnical Testing Journal
Geotechnical Testing Journal 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
53
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Geotechnical Testing Journal is (1) to provide a high-quality publication that informs the profession of new developments in soil and rock testing and related fields; (2) to provide a forum for the exchange of information, particularly that which leads to the development of new test procedures; and (3) to stimulate active participation of the profession in the work of ASTM International Committee D18 on Soil and Rock and related information. The editorial scope of this journal covers test methods for soil and rock, sampling, nomenclature, and practices relating to the determination of properties and behavior of soil and rock for engineering purposes, and for soil as a medium for plant growth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信