患病新生儿的肾小球滤过率:聚焦胱抑素 C

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Olusola Avong, Isa Abdulkadir, Mairo Bugaje
{"title":"患病新生儿的肾小球滤过率:聚焦胱抑素 C","authors":"Olusola Avong, Isa Abdulkadir, Mairo Bugaje","doi":"10.4103/jcn.jcn_33_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The use of creatinine as an endogenous marker of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is well-established in clinical practice, despite its limitations. As a step toward limiting this drawback, cystatin C and various biomarkers came into use in determining renal function. In sick neonates, various pathologies may impair renal function thus, underscoring the need for accurate estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR).\n \n \n \n This study aimed at evaluating the use of cystatin C in estimating the GFR of sick neonates in comparison to creatinine.\n \n \n \n A hospital-based descriptive study was conducted at a tertiary center in North Central, Nigeria, for 4 months. One hundred and seventy-three sick neonates admitted into the special care baby unit were recruited. Blood was sampled at admission for determination of serum creatinine and cystatin C levels, while a repeat sample for creatinine was taken 48 hours after. GFR was estimated using the Schwartz formula for creatinine and the Zappitelli equation for cystatin C and compared with an inulin reference.\n \n \n \n The median (interquartile range [IQR]) eGFR derived from cystatin C was 48.8 (21.0) mL/min/1.73 m2, it was higher than the median creatinine-derived GFR at admission and was of statistical significance. It is also approximated closer to the inulin reference. The median (IQR) eGFR derived from creatinine at admission was 21.2 (21.4) mL/min/1.73 m2. Creatinine-derived eGFR was significantly lower in babies with asphyxia and neonatal sepsis compared to those who did not have these diagnoses. Cystatin C-derived eGFR showed no variation between the various diagnoses.\n \n \n \n In conclusion, cystatin C is a useful and unbiased determinant of eGFR in sick neonates as compared to creatinine.\n","PeriodicalId":45332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neonatology","volume":"7 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glomerular Filtration Rate in Sick Neonates: A Focus on Cystatin C\",\"authors\":\"Olusola Avong, Isa Abdulkadir, Mairo Bugaje\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcn.jcn_33_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n The use of creatinine as an endogenous marker of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is well-established in clinical practice, despite its limitations. As a step toward limiting this drawback, cystatin C and various biomarkers came into use in determining renal function. In sick neonates, various pathologies may impair renal function thus, underscoring the need for accurate estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR).\\n \\n \\n \\n This study aimed at evaluating the use of cystatin C in estimating the GFR of sick neonates in comparison to creatinine.\\n \\n \\n \\n A hospital-based descriptive study was conducted at a tertiary center in North Central, Nigeria, for 4 months. One hundred and seventy-three sick neonates admitted into the special care baby unit were recruited. Blood was sampled at admission for determination of serum creatinine and cystatin C levels, while a repeat sample for creatinine was taken 48 hours after. GFR was estimated using the Schwartz formula for creatinine and the Zappitelli equation for cystatin C and compared with an inulin reference.\\n \\n \\n \\n The median (interquartile range [IQR]) eGFR derived from cystatin C was 48.8 (21.0) mL/min/1.73 m2, it was higher than the median creatinine-derived GFR at admission and was of statistical significance. It is also approximated closer to the inulin reference. The median (IQR) eGFR derived from creatinine at admission was 21.2 (21.4) mL/min/1.73 m2. Creatinine-derived eGFR was significantly lower in babies with asphyxia and neonatal sepsis compared to those who did not have these diagnoses. Cystatin C-derived eGFR showed no variation between the various diagnoses.\\n \\n \\n \\n In conclusion, cystatin C is a useful and unbiased determinant of eGFR in sick neonates as compared to creatinine.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neonatology\",\"volume\":\"7 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcn.jcn_33_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcn.jcn_33_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肌酐作为估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的内源性标志物,尽管有其局限性,但在临床实践中已得到广泛认可。为了限制这一缺陷,胱抑素 C 和各种生物标记物开始用于确定肾功能。在患病的新生儿中,各种病变都可能损害肾功能,因此更需要对肾小球滤过率(GFR)进行准确评估。 本研究旨在评估胱抑素 C 与肌酐相比在估测患病新生儿肾小球滤过率中的应用。 这项以医院为基础的描述性研究在尼日利亚中北部的一家三级医疗中心进行,为期 4 个月。研究招募了 173 名在婴儿特别护理病房住院的患病新生儿。入院时抽血测定血清肌酐和胱抑素 C 水平,48 小时后再次抽血测定肌酐。血肌酐采用施瓦茨公式估算,胱抑素C采用扎皮特利公式估算,并与菊粉参考值进行比较。 根据胱抑素 C 得出的 eGFR 中位数(四分位数间距 [IQR])为 48.8 (21.0) mL/min/1.73 m2,高于入院时肌酐得出的 GFR 中位数,具有统计学意义。其近似值也更接近菊粉参考值。入院时根据肌酐得出的 eGFR 中位数(IQR)为 21.2 (21.4) mL/min/1.73 m2。与未确诊窒息和新生儿败血症的婴儿相比,肌酐得出的 eGFR 明显较低。胱抑素 C 衍生的 eGFR 在不同诊断之间没有差异。 总之,与肌酐相比,胱抑素 C 是决定患病新生儿 eGFR 的有用且无偏见的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glomerular Filtration Rate in Sick Neonates: A Focus on Cystatin C
The use of creatinine as an endogenous marker of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is well-established in clinical practice, despite its limitations. As a step toward limiting this drawback, cystatin C and various biomarkers came into use in determining renal function. In sick neonates, various pathologies may impair renal function thus, underscoring the need for accurate estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This study aimed at evaluating the use of cystatin C in estimating the GFR of sick neonates in comparison to creatinine. A hospital-based descriptive study was conducted at a tertiary center in North Central, Nigeria, for 4 months. One hundred and seventy-three sick neonates admitted into the special care baby unit were recruited. Blood was sampled at admission for determination of serum creatinine and cystatin C levels, while a repeat sample for creatinine was taken 48 hours after. GFR was estimated using the Schwartz formula for creatinine and the Zappitelli equation for cystatin C and compared with an inulin reference. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) eGFR derived from cystatin C was 48.8 (21.0) mL/min/1.73 m2, it was higher than the median creatinine-derived GFR at admission and was of statistical significance. It is also approximated closer to the inulin reference. The median (IQR) eGFR derived from creatinine at admission was 21.2 (21.4) mL/min/1.73 m2. Creatinine-derived eGFR was significantly lower in babies with asphyxia and neonatal sepsis compared to those who did not have these diagnoses. Cystatin C-derived eGFR showed no variation between the various diagnoses. In conclusion, cystatin C is a useful and unbiased determinant of eGFR in sick neonates as compared to creatinine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The JCN publishes original articles, clinical reviews and research reports which encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信